These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. ACR MRI site accreditation. What will its impact be? Rothschild P Adm Radiol J; 1997; 16(4-5):19-21. PubMed ID: 10169516 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The evolution of NCQA accreditation. Sennett C Healthplan; 1999; 40(2):19-23. PubMed ID: 10537467 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantifying quality: NCQA looks at economic impact of improving health care. Qual Lett Healthc Lead; 2001 Oct; 13(10):13-4, 1. PubMed ID: 11757345 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The high price of quality: a cost analysis of NCQA accreditation. Mihalik GJ; Scherer MR; Schreter RK J Health Care Finance; 2003; 29(3):38-47. PubMed ID: 12635993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. ACR accreditation of nuclear medicine and PET imaging departments. MacFarlane CR; J Nucl Med Technol; 2006 Mar; 34(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 16517965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Preparing for NCQA: what not to do. Carlson B Manag Care; 2004 Aug; 13(8):36-7, 39-41. PubMed ID: 15457894 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. ACR practice guideline for the performance and interpretation of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Woodard PK; Bluemke DA; Cascade PN; Finn JP; Stillman AE; Higgins CB; White RD; Yucel EK; J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Sep; 3(9):665-76. PubMed ID: 17412147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. New HEDIS areas include population health, service. Healthcare Benchmarks Qual Improv; 2003 Sep; 10(9):103-5. PubMed ID: 12966685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Acceptance testing of medical imaging equipment: CT and MRI. Padikal TN Appl Radiol; 1987 Nov; 16(11):57, 60-4. PubMed ID: 10285160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A conversation with Cary Sennett, MD. Sennett C Med Interface; 1997 May; 10(5):65-8. PubMed ID: 10167506 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. MRI safety is the focus of new Sentinel Event Alert. Hosp Peer Rev; 2008 Jul; 33(7):97-8. PubMed ID: 19035034 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The Patient's Bill of Rights: views of an accreditor. O'Kane ME Manag Care Interface; 2000 Oct; 13(10):67-8. PubMed ID: 11155646 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Clinical evaluation and current state of MRI low-field magnetics (<0,5 TESLA) equipment]. Bonniol V J Radiol; 2001 May; 82(5):603-4. PubMed ID: 11517905 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. It just makes sense. Stoneham L Tex Med; 1999 Mar; 95(3):34-7. PubMed ID: 10932632 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The AHA Scientific Statement of MRI in patients with devices: neat, but incomplete. Unwise and unsupported. Gimbel JR Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2008 Jun; 31(6):649-51. PubMed ID: 18507535 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Testing MR safety and compatibility: an overview of the methods and current standards. Schaefers G IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2008; 27(3):23-7. PubMed ID: 18519178 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Do quality improvement strategies for Medicaid enrollees differ in Medicaid-dominant versus commercial managed care organizations? Felt-Lisk S; Gold MR Am J Manag Care; 2003 Dec; 9(12):806-16. PubMed ID: 14712757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]