These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11692661)

  • 21. Comparison of three intra-oral storage phosphor systems using subjective image quality.
    Kitagawa H; Farman AG; Scheetz JP; Brown WP; Lewis J; Benefiel M; Kuroyanagi K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Sep; 29(5):272-6. PubMed ID: 10980561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Development and evaluation of digital subtraction radiography computer program.
    Lee SS; Huh YJ; Kim KY; Heo MS; Choi SC; Koak JY; Heo SJ; Han CH; Yi WJ
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2004 Oct; 98(4):471-5. PubMed ID: 15472663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Imaging modalities for dental implants: DEXIS digital radiography.
    Garg AK
    Dent Implantol Update; 2007 Oct; 18(10):73-7. PubMed ID: 17953276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The digital revolution, images and X-rays.
    Emmott LF
    N Y State Dent J; 2005 Jan; 71(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 15768910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Is digital better in dental radiography?
    Zdesar U; Fortuna T; Valantic B; Skrk D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):138-9. PubMed ID: 18375462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparative study of two digital radiographic storage phosphor systems.
    Oliveira AE; de Almeida SM; Paganini GA; Haiter Neto F; Bóscolo FN
    Braz Dent J; 2000; 11(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 11210259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Accuracy of digital and analogue cephalometric measurements assessed with the sandwich technique.
    Santoro M; Jarjoura K; Cangialosi TJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Mar; 129(3):345-51. PubMed ID: 16527629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Pseudo-color filter in two-dimensional imaging in dentistry].
    Kats L; Vered M
    Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2014 Oct; 31(4):13-5, 59. PubMed ID: 25549388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of beam energy and filtration on the signal-to-noise ratio of the Dexis intraoral X-ray detector.
    Kitagawa H; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 15140818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of physical properties of different digital intraoral sensors.
    Al-Rawi W; Teich S
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2013 Sep; 34(8):e76-83. PubMed ID: 24568289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effective and quality-controlled use of digital radiography in dental practice.
    Koch S; Wagner IV; Schneider W
    Int J Comput Dent; 2000 May; 3(2):107-18. PubMed ID: 11351550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Digital radiographic equipment in the Belgian dental office.
    Gijbels F; Debaveye D; Vanderstappen M; Jacobs R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):309-12. PubMed ID: 16461489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Performance evaluation and testing of digital intra-oral radiographic systems.
    Doyle P; Finney L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):313-7. PubMed ID: 16461488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Analysis of the reproducibility of the gray values and noise of a direct digital radiography system.
    Poleti ML; Fernandes TM; Teixeira RC; Capelozza AL; Rubira-Bullen IR
    Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():. PubMed ID: 26017488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Bitewing examination with four digital receptors.
    Bahrami G; Hagstrøm C; Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Sep; 32(5):317-21. PubMed ID: 14709607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Intraoral radiology in general dental practices - a comparison of digital and film-based X-ray systems with regard to radiation protection and dose reduction.
    Anissi HD; Geibel MA
    Rofo; 2014 Aug; 186(8):762-7. PubMed ID: 24648236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Detecting computer-enhanced dentistry.
    Neiburger EJ; Frandzel YL
    J Mass Dent Soc; 2008; 57(2):30-2. PubMed ID: 18705212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Fraudulent use of digital radiographs: secret reality or fiction?].
    Calberson F; Hommez G; De Moor R
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2005; 60(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 15943060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Conventional and predicted perceptibility curves for contrast-enhanced direct digital intraoral radiographs.
    Yoshiura K; Welander U; Shi XQ; Li G; Kawazu T; Tatsumi M; Okamura K; McDavid WD; Kanda S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Jul; 30(4):219-25. PubMed ID: 11681484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An aiming device for an extraoral radiographic technique.
    Chen CH; Lin SH; Chiu HL; Lin YJ; Chen YK; Lin LM
    J Endod; 2007 Jun; 33(6):758-60. PubMed ID: 17509422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.