These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11693007)

  • 1. Shrinkage stresses associated with incremental composite filling techniques in conservative Class II restorations.
    Jedrychowski JR; Bleier RG; Caputo AA
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2001; 68(3):161-7, 150. PubMed ID: 11693007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Shrinkage stresses associated with incremental composite filling techniques.
    Jedrychowski JR; Bleier RG; Caputo AA
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1998; 65(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 9617451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Polymerization contraction stresses of resin-based composite restorations within beveled cavity preparations of Class I restorations.
    Kinomoto Y; Torii M; Takeshige F; Ebisu S
    Am J Dent; 2003 Apr; 16(2):139-43. PubMed ID: 12797575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Microleakage of Class V composites using different placement and curing techniques: an in vitro study.
    St Georges AJ; Wilder AD; Perdigão J; Swift EJ
    Am J Dent; 2002 Aug; 15(4):244-7. PubMed ID: 12572642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of placement techniques on the marginal adaptation of Class V composite restorations.
    Sensi LG; Marson FC; Baratieri LN; Monteiro Junior S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2005 Nov; 6(4):17-25. PubMed ID: 16299603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of thickness of flowable resins on marginal leakage in class II composite restorations.
    Malmström HS; Schlueter M; Roach T; Moss ME
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 12120775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Composite resin restorations of large class II cavities using split-increment horizontal placement technique.
    Hassan K; Khier S
    Gen Dent; 2006; 54(3):172-7. PubMed ID: 16776408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Polymerization shrinkage: effects of constraint and filling technique in composite restorations.
    Loguercio AD; Reis A; Ballester RY
    Dent Mater; 2004 Mar; 20(3):236-43. PubMed ID: 15209228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of different modes of light curing and resin composites on microleakage of Class II restorations.
    Hardan LS; Amm EW; Ghayad A
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2008 Dec; 31(124):27-34. PubMed ID: 19441264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hardness comparison of bulk-filled/transtooth and incremental-filled/occlusally irradiated composite resins.
    Lazarchik DA; Hammond BD; Sikes CL; Looney SW; Rueggeberg FA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Aug; 98(2):129-40. PubMed ID: 17692594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Marginal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in Class II conservative preparations.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2001 May; 32(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 11444073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Class I and Class II restorations of resin composite: an FE analysis of the influence of modulus of elasticity on stresses generated by occlusal loading.
    Asmussen E; Peutzfeldt A
    Dent Mater; 2008 May; 24(5):600-5. PubMed ID: 17767951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tooth deformation patterns in molars after composite restoration.
    Tantbirojn D; Versluis A; Pintado MR; DeLong R; Douglas WH
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jul; 20(6):535-42. PubMed ID: 15134941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
    de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A review of polymerization shrinkage stress: current techniques for posterior direct resin restorations.
    Giachetti L; Scaminaci Russo D; Bambi C; Grandini R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Sep; 7(4):79-88. PubMed ID: 16957794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Load-induced stresses in photoelastic primary canines with facial restorations.
    Rabitz GK; Berson R; Caputo AA; Franklin RJ; Del Fierro DB
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2006; 73(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 17367035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of different softstart polymerization techniques on marginal adaptation of Class V restorations.
    Muangmingsuk A; Senawongse P; Yudhasaraprasithi S
    Am J Dent; 2003 Apr; 16(2):117-9. PubMed ID: 12797570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of new light curing units and bonding agents on the microleakage of Class V composite resin restorations.
    Pradelle-Plasse N; Besnault C; Souad N; Colon P
    Am J Dent; 2003 Dec; 16(6):409-13. PubMed ID: 15002957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of light source position and bevel placement on facial margin adaptation of resin-based composite restorations.
    Hoelscher DC; Gregory WA; Linger JB; Pink FE
    Am J Dent; 2000 Aug; 13(4):171-5. PubMed ID: 11763925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Guidance of shrinkage vectors vs irradiation at reduced intensity for improving marginal seal of class V resin-based composite restorations in vitro.
    Hofmann N; Hiltl O; Hugo B; Klaiber B
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):510-5. PubMed ID: 12216571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.