BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

978 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11693324)

  • 1. Can endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography replace ERCP in patients with suspected biliary disease? A prospective trial and cost analysis.
    Scheiman JM; Carlos RC; Barnett JL; Elta GH; Nostrant TT; Chey WD; Francis IR; Nandi PS
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Oct; 96(10):2900-4. PubMed ID: 11693324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasonography, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients suspected of pancreaticobiliary disease.
    Ainsworth AP; Rafaelsen SR; Wamberg PA; Pless T; Durup J; Mortensen MB
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2004 Jun; 39(6):579-83. PubMed ID: 15223684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Where do ERCP, endoscopic ultrasound, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, and intraoperative cholangiography fit in the management of acute biliary pancreatitis? A decision analysis model.
    Arguedas MR; Dupont AW; Wilcox CM
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Oct; 96(10):2892-9. PubMed ID: 11693323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The detection of bile duct stones in suspected biliary pancreatitis: comparison of MRCP, ERCP, and intraductal US.
    Moon JH; Cho YD; Cha SW; Cheon YK; Ahn HC; Kim YS; Kim YS; Lee JS; Lee MS; Lee HK; Shim CS; Kim BS
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2005 May; 100(5):1051-7. PubMed ID: 15842578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Endosonography- vs. endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-based strategies in the evaluation of suspected common bile duct stones in patients with normal transabdominal imaging.
    Ang TL; Teo EK; Fock KM
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2007 Oct; 26(8):1163-70. PubMed ID: 17894658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detection of common bile duct stones: comparison between endoscopic ultrasonography, magnetic resonance cholangiography, and helical-computed-tomographic cholangiography.
    Kondo S; Isayama H; Akahane M; Toda N; Sasahira N; Nakai Y; Yamamoto N; Hirano K; Komatsu Y; Tada M; Yoshida H; Kawabe T; Ohtomo K; Omata M
    Eur J Radiol; 2005 May; 54(2):271-5. PubMed ID: 15837409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, intraductal ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in bile duct strictures: a prospective comparison of imaging diagnostics with histopathological correlation.
    Domagk D; Wessling J; Reimer P; Hertel L; Poremba C; Senninger N; Heinecke A; Domschke W; Menzel J
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Sep; 99(9):1684-9. PubMed ID: 15330902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: comparative study with direct cholangiography].
    Basile L; Pezzoto C; Roubicek D; Tempra A; Laborda Molteni J
    Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam; 2000; 30(5):487-90. PubMed ID: 11144943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of pancreatobiliary diseases: a prospective study.
    Fernández-Esparrach G; Ginès A; Sánchez M; Pagés M; Pellisé M; Fernández-Cruz L; López-Boado MA; Quintó L; Navarro S; Sendino O; Cárdenas A; Ayuso C; Bordas JM; Llach J; Castells A
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2007 Aug; 102(8):1632-9. PubMed ID: 17521400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical impact of MR cholangiopancreatography in patients with biliary disease.
    Filippone A; Ambrosini R; Fuschi M; Marinelli T; Pinto D; Maggialetti A
    Radiol Med; 2003; 105(1-2):27-35. PubMed ID: 12700542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis: a prospective comparison study.
    Pungpapong S; Wallace MB; Woodward TA; Noh KW; Raimondo M
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2007 Jan; 41(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 17198070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Making cost-effectiveness analyses clinically relevant: the effect of provider expertise and biliary disease prevalence on the economic comparison of alternative diagnostic strategies.
    Carlos RC; Scheiman JM; Hussain HK; Song JH; Francis IR; Fendrick AM
    Acad Radiol; 2003 Jun; 10(6):620-30. PubMed ID: 12809415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. MRCP-secretin test-guided management of idiopathic recurrent pancreatitis: long-term outcomes.
    Testoni PA; Mariani A; Curioni S; Zanello A; Masci E
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2008 Jun; 67(7):1028-34. PubMed ID: 18179795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The roles of magnetic resonance and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (MRCP and ERCP) in the diagnosis of patients with suspected sclerosing cholangitis: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Meagher S; Yusoff I; Kennedy W; Martel M; Adam V; Barkun A
    Endoscopy; 2007 Mar; 39(3):222-8. PubMed ID: 17385107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the accurate diagnosis of biliary complications after liver transplantation: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography - long-term follow-up.
    Katz LH; Benjaminov O; Belinki A; Geler A; Braun M; Knizhnik M; Aizner S; Shaharabani E; Sulkes J; Shabtai E; Pappo O; Atar E; Tur-Kaspa R; Mor E; Ben-Ari Z
    Clin Transplant; 2010; 24(5):E163-9. PubMed ID: 21039885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The decision-making value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients seen in a referral center for suspected biliary and pancreatic disease.
    Sahai AV; Devonshire D; Yeoh KG; Kay C; Feldman D; Willner I; Farber J; Patel R; Tamasky PR; Cunningham JT; Trus T; Hawes RH; Cotton PB
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Jul; 96(7):2074-80. PubMed ID: 11467634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Magnetic resonance-cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of biliopancreatic diseases.
    Lomanto D; Pavone P; Laghi A; Panebianco V; Mazzocchi P; Fiocca F; Lezoche E; Passariello R; Speranza V
    Am J Surg; 1997 Jul; 174(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 9240949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Single-step treatment of gall bladder and bile duct stones: a combined endoscopic-laparoscopic technique.
    Ghazal AH; Sorour MA; El-Riwini M; El-Bahrawy H
    Int J Surg; 2009 Aug; 7(4):338-46. PubMed ID: 19481184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of EUS and ERCP in the investigation with suspected biliary obstruction caused by choledocholithiasis: a randomized study.
    Lee YT; Chan FK; Leung WK; Chan HL; Wu JC; Yung MY; Ng EK; Lau JY; Sung JJ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2008 Apr; 67(4):660-8. PubMed ID: 18155205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modern imaging methods versus clinical assessment in the evaluation of hospital in-patients with suspected pancreatic disease.
    Rösch T; Schusdziarra V; Born P; Bautz W; Baumgartner M; Ulm K; Lorenz R; Allescher HD; Gerhardt P; Siewert JR; Classen M
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2000 Sep; 95(9):2261-70. PubMed ID: 11007227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 49.