980 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11693324)
21. Single-session endosonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for biliopancreatic diseases is feasible, effective and cost beneficial.
Gornals JB; Moreno R; Castellote J; Loras C; Barranco R; Catala I; Xiol X; Fabregat J; Corbella X
Dig Liver Dis; 2013 Jul; 45(7):578-83. PubMed ID: 23465682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Noninvasive vs. selective invasive biliary imaging for acute biliary pancreatitis: an economic evaluation by using decision tree analysis.
Romagnuolo J; Currie G;
Gastrointest Endosc; 2005 Jan; 61(1):86-97. PubMed ID: 15672062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Cost-minimization analysis of MRC versus ERCP for the diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis.
Talwalkar JA; Angulo P; Johnson CD; Petersen BT; Lindor KD
Hepatology; 2004 Jul; 40(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 15239084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The selective use of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the imaging of the axial biliary tree in patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis.
Mofidi R; Lee AC; Madhavan KK; Garden OJ; Parks RW
Pancreatology; 2008; 8(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 18253063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Is there a difference in diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact between endoscopic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography?
Ainsworth AP; Rafaelsen SR; Wamberg PA; Durup J; Pless TK; Mortensen MB
Endoscopy; 2003 Dec; 35(12):1029-32. PubMed ID: 14648416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction type II: empirical biliary sphincterotomy or manometry-guided therapy?
Arguedas MR; Linder JD; Wilcox CM
Endoscopy; 2004 Feb; 36(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 14765316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Value of magnetic-resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) after unsuccessful endoscopic-retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).
Owens GR; Shutz SM
Gastrointest Endosc; 1999 Feb; 49(2):265-6. PubMed ID: 10084882
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. A cost-minimization analysis of alternative strategies in diagnosing pancreatic cancer.
Chen VK; Arguedas MR; Kilgore ML; Eloubeidi MA
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Nov; 99(11):2223-34. PubMed ID: 15555006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Prospective randomized trial of EUS versus ERCP-guided common bile duct stone removal: an interim report (with video).
Artifon EL; Kumar A; Eloubeidi MA; Chu A; Halwan B; Sakai P; Bhutani MS
Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Feb; 69(2):238-43. PubMed ID: 19185687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Extrahepatic biliary obstruction: magnetic resonance imaging compared with endoscopic ultrasonography.
Materne R; Van Beers BE; Gigot JF; Jamart J; Geubel A; Pringot J; Deprez P
Endoscopy; 2000 Jan; 32(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 10691265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [NMR cholangiography in the diagnostic algorithm of candidates to video laparocholecystectomy].
Puglisi F; Magialetti A; Carriero A; Capuano F; De Fazio M; Verzillo F; Martines G; Simone M
Minerva Chir; 2000 Sep; 55(9):581-5. PubMed ID: 11155470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. MRCP in the diagnosis of iatrogenic bile duct injury.
Bujanda L; Calvo MM; Cabriada JL; Orive V; Capelastegui A
NMR Biomed; 2003 Dec; 16(8):475-8. PubMed ID: 14696004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Current status of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. What is the effect of the introduction of magnetic resonance cholangiography?].
Linares Torres P; Vivas Alegre S; Espinel Díez J; Rueda Castañón R; Muñoz Núñez F; Domínguez Carbajo A; Rodríguez Morejón C; Gutiérrez Arias M; Jorquera Plaza F; Herrera Abian A; Fernández Gundín M; Villanueva Pavón R; Olcoz Goñi J
Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2001 Dec; 24(10):483-8. PubMed ID: 11730616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Diagnostic value of MRCP and indications for ERCP.
Sakai Y; Tsuyuguchi T; Tsuchiya S; Sugiyama H; Miyakawa K; Ebara M; Saisho H; Yokosuka O
Hepatogastroenterology; 2007 Dec; 54(80):2212-5. PubMed ID: 18265635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Prospective assessment of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for noninvasive imaging of the biliary tree.
Taylor AC; Little AF; Hennessy OF; Banting SW; Smith PJ; Desmond PV
Gastrointest Endosc; 2002 Jan; 55(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 11756908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cost minimization analysis comparing diagnostic strategies in unexplained pancreatitis.
Wilcox CM; Kilgore M
Pancreas; 2009 Mar; 38(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 18852686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Malignant perihilar biliary obstruction: magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatographic findings.
Yeh TS; Jan YY; Tseng JH; Chiu CT; Chen TC; Hwang TL; Chen MF
Am J Gastroenterol; 2000 Feb; 95(2):432-40. PubMed ID: 10685746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Severe and fatal complications after diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective series of claims to insurance covering public hospitals.
Trap R; Adamsen S; Hart-Hansen O; Henriksen M
Endoscopy; 1999 Feb; 31(2):125-30. PubMed ID: 10223360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A prospective study of complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasound in an ambulatory endoscopy center.
Mahnke D; Chen YK; Antillon MR; Brown WR; Mattison R; Shah RJ
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2006 Jul; 4(7):924-30. PubMed ID: 16797251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [New diagnostic strategies in biliary-pancreatic diseases].
Devière J; Matos C
Rev Med Brux; 2000 Sep; 21(4):A314-7. PubMed ID: 11068486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
