These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11694240)

  • 21. Improving Transfusion Safety in the Operating Room With a Barcode Scanning System Designed Specifically for the Surgical Environment and Existing Electronic Medical Record Systems: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis.
    Vanneman MW; Balakrishna A; Lang AL; Eliason KD; Payette AM; Xu X; Driscoll WD; Donovan KM; Deng H; Dzik WH; Levine WC
    Anesth Analg; 2020 Oct; 131(4):1217-1227. PubMed ID: 32925343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Use of an electronic barcode system for patient identification during blood transfusion: 3-year experience in a regional hospital.
    Chan JC; Chu RW; Young BW; Chan F; Chow CC; Pang WC; Chan C; Yeung SH; Chow PK; Lau J; Leung PM
    Hong Kong Med J; 2004 Jun; 10(3):166-71. PubMed ID: 15181220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Transfusion errors in New York State: an analysis of 10 years' experience.
    Linden JV; Wagner K; Voytovich AE; Sheehan J
    Transfusion; 2000 Oct; 40(10):1207-13. PubMed ID: 11061857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. SHOT conference report 2016: serious hazards of transfusion - human factors continue to cause most transfusion-related incidents.
    Bolton-Maggs PH
    Transfus Med; 2016 Dec; 26(6):401-405. PubMed ID: 27995700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Sample collection for pre-transfusion crossmatching: Benefits of using an electronic identification system.
    Shin KH; Lee HJ; Oh SH; Jo SY; Lee SM; Kim IS
    Transfus Med; 2022 Aug; 32(4):299-305. PubMed ID: 35365920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Fatal hemolytic transfusion reaction resulting from ABO mistyping of a patient with acquired B antigen detectable only by some monoclonal anti-B reagents.
    Garratty G; Arndt P; Co A; Rodberg K; Furmanski M
    Transfusion; 1996 Apr; 36(4):351-7. PubMed ID: 8623139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Impact of an Electronic Ordering System on Blood Bank Specimen Rejection Rates.
    Forest SK; Shirazi M; Wu-Gall C; Stotler BA
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2017 Jan; 147(1):105-109. PubMed ID: 28158445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. ABO blood group discrepancies among blood donors in Regional Blood Transfusion Centre GTB Hospital, Delhi, India.
    Sharma T; Garg N; Singh B
    Transfus Apher Sci; 2014 Feb; 50(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 24314713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A report of 104 transfusion errors in New York State.
    Linden JV; Paul B; Dressler KP
    Transfusion; 1992 Sep; 32(7):601-6. PubMed ID: 1519323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Consecutive national surveys of ABO-incompatible blood transfusion in Japan.
    Fujii Y; Shibata Y; Miyata S; Inaba S; Asai T; Hoshi Y; Takamatsu J; Takahashi K; Ohto H; Juji T; Sagawa K
    Vox Sang; 2009 Oct; 97(3):240-6. PubMed ID: 19476605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. How do I…Incorporate a two-sample blood type verification in a pediatric hospital?
    Gálvez J; Hsu G; Dubow S; Obermeier L; Blair P; Friedman D; Sesok-Pizzini D
    Transfusion; 2020 Dec; 60(12):2787-2792. PubMed ID: 32860229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Nearly two decades using the check-type to prevent ABO incompatible transfusions: one institution's experience.
    Figueroa PI; Ziman A; Wheeler C; Gornbein J; Monson M; Calhoun L
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 Sep; 126(3):422-6. PubMed ID: 16880143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Medicolegal assessment of blood transfusion errors--an interdisciplinary challenge.
    Padosch SA; Schmidt PH; Pedal I; Franchy C; Hoch J; Madea B
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Oct; 172(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 17222999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Errors in determining blood groups (lecture)].
    Donskov SI
    Klin Lab Diagn; 2003 Apr; (4):25-32. PubMed ID: 12774667
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [An a priori risk analysis study. Securisation of transfusion of blood product in a hospital: from the reception in the medical unit to its administration].
    Bertrand E; Lévy R; Boyeldieu D
    Transfus Clin Biol; 2013 Dec; 20(5-6):458-68. PubMed ID: 24176607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The risk of transfusion to the wrong patient in Germany.
    Caspari G; Alpen U; Greinacher A
    Transfusion; 2002 Sep; 42(9):1238-9. PubMed ID: 12430685
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A computer-assisted transfusion management system and changed transfusion practices contribute to appropriate management of blood components.
    Ohsaka A; Abe K; Ohsawa T; Miyake N; Sugita S; Tojima I
    Transfusion; 2008 Aug; 48(8):1730-8. PubMed ID: 18482189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Causes of failure of a barcode-based pretransfusion check at the bedside: experience in a university hospital.
    Ohsaka A; Kobayashi M; Abe K
    Transfus Med; 2008 Aug; 18(4):216-22. PubMed ID: 18783580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Successful use of eculizumab for treatment of an acute hemolytic reaction after ABO-incompatible red blood cell transfusion.
    Weinstock C; Möhle R; Dorn C; Weisel K; Höchsmann B; Schrezenmeier H; Kanz L
    Transfusion; 2015 Mar; 55(3):605-10. PubMed ID: 25251967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A systematic review of validated methods for identifying transfusion-related ABO incompatibility reactions using administrative and claims data.
    Carnahan RM; Kee VR
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2012 Jan; 21 Suppl 1():230-5. PubMed ID: 22262610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.