149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11695172)
1. The blood bank software of your dreams.
Butch SH
CAP Today; 2001 Oct; 15(10):30-4, 36-8, 40 passim. PubMed ID: 11695172
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical laboratory information system.
Aller R
CAP Today; 1999 Nov; 13(11):66-8, 70, 72 passim. PubMed ID: 10724684
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. AP Easy: information management software for anatomic pathology.
Kisner HJ
Clin Lab Manage Rev; 1996; 10(3):287-90. PubMed ID: 10158401
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. For glucose systems, greater accuracy and safety.
Ford A
CAP Today; 2005 Apr; 19(4):44, 46, 48 passim. PubMed ID: 15909852
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Be software savvy: buy wisely to bill accurately.
Weiner H
CAP Today; 2005 Apr; 19(4):20-2, 24, 26-7. PubMed ID: 15909851
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. "A picture is worth ...".
Sehloff JA
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1995 Aug; 27(8):36, 38. PubMed ID: 10144935
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Can 4GL revolutionize your lab?
Csuka JD
Healthc Inform; 1991 Sep; 8(9):44, 46, 50. PubMed ID: 10120841
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The use of the computer cross-match.
Engelfreit CP; Reesink HW; Krusius T; Wendel S; Fontäo-Wendel R; Hoffer I; Medgyesi G; Tadokoro K; Pisacka M; Kühnl P; Schwartz DW; Mayr WR; Schönitzer D; Lin CK; James V; Castel A; Hazenberg CA; Letowska M; Solheim BG; Guerts M; Ghosh S; Flanagan P; Epstein J; Säfwenberg J; Riccardi D; Sirchia G
Vox Sang; 2001 Apr; 80(3):184-92. PubMed ID: 11449959
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Electronic blood matching. Antibodies of evidence.
Mitchell P
Health Serv J; 2000 Mar; 110(5696):suppl 9-10. PubMed ID: 11067496
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of a Type and Screen program in hospital blood bank inventory control.
Muschenheim F
J Med Soc N J; 1982 Oct; 79(11):823-6. PubMed ID: 6960182
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Guidelines for blood bank computing.
Ashford P; Gozzard D; Jones J; Revill J; Wallis J; Bruce M; Chapman J; Cohen H; Duguid J; Kelsy PR; Knowles SM; Murphy MF; Williamson L;
Transfus Med; 2000 Dec; 10(4):307-14. PubMed ID: 11123815
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. System users enjoy unusual price/performance ratio--Hummingbird LIS.
Healthc Inform; 1992 Mar; 9(3):64, 66. PubMed ID: 10117890
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Blood screening in a southern Nigeria City: a case study with SAVAN.
Ehikhamenor E; Azodo C; Chinedu E; Festus E
Traffic Inj Prev; 2009 Oct; 10(5):506-9. PubMed ID: 19746315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Blood banks step up move to automation.
Paxton A
CAP Today; 1999 Oct; 13(10):1, 28-32, 34 passim. PubMed ID: 10623386
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Blood bank information systems.
Aller R; Carey K
CAP Today; 1999 Oct; 13(10):40-2, 44-6. PubMed ID: 10623387
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. From serological to computer cross-matching in nine hospitals.
Georgsen J; Kristensen T
Vox Sang; 1998; 74 Suppl 2():419-25. PubMed ID: 9704476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Containing costs in the blood bank by reducing unnecessary crossmatching.
Friedman BA
Pathologist; 1984 Jul; 38(7):405-10. PubMed ID: 10267505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Virtual blood banking: a 7-year experience.
Wong KF; Kwan AM
Am J Clin Pathol; 2005 Jul; 124(1):124-8. PubMed ID: 15923176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. America's 10 most computer advanced laboratories.
Healthc Inform; 1996 Mar; 13(3):29-32, 36, 38. PubMed ID: 10155763
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Consider how an LIS fits into your enterprise's strategy.
Rushing JS
Health Manag Technol; 1996 Aug; 17(9):39-41. PubMed ID: 10159590
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
