BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

349 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11695556)

  • 21. Are tumor incidence rates from chronic bioassays telling us what we need to know about carcinogens?
    Gaylor DW
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Mar; 41(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 15698536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The rasH2 transgenic mouse: nature of the model and mechanistic studies on tumorigenesis.
    Tamaoki N
    Toxicol Pathol; 2001; 29 Suppl():81-9. PubMed ID: 11695564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The transgenic mouse assay as an alternative test method for regulatory carcinogenicity studies--implications for REACH.
    Wells MY; Williams ES
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Mar; 53(2):150-5. PubMed ID: 19126422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Neonatal mouse assay for tumorigenicity: alternative to the chronic rodent bioassay.
    Flammang TJ; Tungeln LS; Kadlubar FF; Fu PP
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1997 Oct; 26(2):230-40. PubMed ID: 9356286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Background and framework for ILSI's collaborative evaluation program on alternative models for carcinogenicity assessment. International Life Sciences Institute.
    Robinson DE; MacDonald JS
    Toxicol Pathol; 2001; 29 Suppl():13-9. PubMed ID: 11695549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The syrian hamster embryo (SHE) cell transformation assay: review of the methods and results.
    Mauthe RJ; Gibson DP; Bunch RT; Custer L
    Toxicol Pathol; 2001; 29 Suppl():138-46. PubMed ID: 11695550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Is p53 haploinsufficient for tumor suppression? Implications for the p53+/- mouse model in carcinogenicity testing.
    Venkatachalam S; Tyner SD; Pickering CR; Boley S; Recio L; French JE; Donehower LA
    Toxicol Pathol; 2001; 29 Suppl():147-54. PubMed ID: 11695551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Deregulation of cancer-related pathways in primary hepatocytes derived from DNA repair-deficient Xpa-/-p53+/- mice upon exposure to benzo[a]pyrene.
    van Kesteren PC; Zwart PE; Pennings JL; Gottschalk WH; Kleinjans JC; van Delft JH; van Steeg H; Luijten M
    Toxicol Sci; 2011 Sep; 123(1):123-32. PubMed ID: 21715664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Tg.AC (v-Ha-ras) transgenic mouse: nature of the model.
    Tennant RW; Stasiewicz S; Eastin WC; Mennear JH; Spalding JW
    Toxicol Pathol; 2001; 29 Suppl():51-9. PubMed ID: 11695562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The role of transgenic mouse models in carcinogen identification.
    Pritchard JB; French JE; Davis BJ; Haseman JK
    Environ Health Perspect; 2003 Apr; 111(4):444-54. PubMed ID: 12676597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of transgenic mouse bioassays for identifying carcinogens and noncarcinogens.
    Tennant RW; Spalding J; French JE
    Mutat Res; 1996 Sep; 365(1-3):119-27. PubMed ID: 8898993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The in vivo rodent test systems for assessment of carcinogenic potential.
    van der Laan JW; Spindler P
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2002 Feb; 35(1):122-5. PubMed ID: 11846641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Pathological features of spontaneous and induced tumors in transgenic mice carrying a human prototype c-Ha-ras gene used for six-month carcinogenicity studies.
    Mitsumori K; Koizumi H; Nomura T; Yamamoto S
    Toxicol Pathol; 1998; 26(4):520-31. PubMed ID: 9715511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Rapid induction of more malignant tumors by various genotoxic carcinogens in transgenic mice harboring a human prototype c-Ha-ras gene than in control non-transgenic mice.
    Yamamoto S; Mitsumori K; Kodama Y; Matsunuma N; Manabe S; Okamiya H; Suzuki H; Fukuda T; Sakamaki Y; Sunaga M; Nomura G; Hioki K; Wakana S; Nomura T; Hayashi Y
    Carcinogenesis; 1996 Nov; 17(11):2455-61. PubMed ID: 8968063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Alternatives to the carcinogenicity bioassay for toxicity prediction: are we there yet?
    Benigni R
    Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol; 2012 Apr; 8(4):407-17. PubMed ID: 22360376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Criteria for the evaluation of studies in transgenic models.
    Popp JA
    Toxicol Pathol; 2001; 29 Suppl():20-3. PubMed ID: 11695558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Finding transcriptomics biomarkers for in vivo identification of (non-)genotoxic carcinogens using wild-type and Xpa/p53 mutant mouse models.
    Jonker MJ; Bruning O; van Iterson M; Schaap MM; van der Hoeven TV; Vrieling H; Beems RB; de Vries A; van Steeg H; Breit TM; Luijten M
    Carcinogenesis; 2009 Oct; 30(10):1805-12. PubMed ID: 19696161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Genetically altered mouse models for identifying carcinogens.
    Tennant RW; Stasiewicz S; Mennear J; French JE; Spalding JW
    IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):123-50. PubMed ID: 10353386
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Spontaneous and chemically induced proliferative lesions in Tg.AC transgenic and p53-heterozygous mice.
    Mahler JF; Flagler ND; Malarkey DE; Mann PC; Haseman JK; Eastin W
    Toxicol Pathol; 1998; 26(4):501-11. PubMed ID: 9715509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Application of genetically altered models as replacement for the lifetime mouse bioassay in pharmaceutical development.
    Alden C; Smith P; Morton D
    Toxicol Pathol; 2002; 30(1):135-8. PubMed ID: 11890466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.