These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1169561)

  • 21. The irritancy and allergenicity of 2-n-octyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one (Skane M-8), with recommendations for patch test concentration.
    Emmett EA; Ng SK; Levy MA; Moss JN; Morici IJ
    Contact Dermatitis; 1989 Jan; 20(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 2914432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Lysosomal enzyme activity as an indicator for the toxicological evaluation of contact allergens. I. Contact allergy].
    Kiss E
    Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig; 1983; 34(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 6612191
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Contact dermatitis from miranols.
    Verbov JL
    Trans St Johns Hosp Dermatol Soc; 1969; 55(2):192-5. PubMed ID: 5370615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Guinea pig maximization test, open epicutaneous test and chamber test in induction of delayed contact hypersensitivity.
    Kero M; Hannuksela M
    Contact Dermatitis; 1980 Aug; 6(5):341-4. PubMed ID: 7418390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Allergic contact dermatitis. Common allergens.
    Glass LF; Huntley AC
    Clin Rev Allergy; 1989; 7(4):381-98. PubMed ID: 2691042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Quantitation of contact allergy in guinea pigs by measuring changes in skin blood flow and skin fold thickness.
    Andersen KE; Staberg B
    Acta Derm Venereol; 1985; 65(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 2578704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Contact sensitivity and bioavailability of chlorocresol.
    Andersen KE; Carlsen L; Egsgaard H; Larsen E
    Contact Dermatitis; 1985 Oct; 13(4):246-51. PubMed ID: 4085224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Tris (2,3-dibromopropyl) phosphate: human contact sensitization.
    Morrow RW; Hornberger CS; Kligman AM; Maibach HI
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1976 Mar; 37(3):192-7. PubMed ID: 1266738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Patch testing.
    McGillis ST; Burrall BA; Huntley AC
    Clin Rev Allergy; 1989; 7(4):441-53. PubMed ID: 2691044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Contact allergy to acid and neutral fractions of rosins. Sensitization experiments in guinea pigs and patch testing in patients.
    Karlberg AT; Boman A; Holmbom B; Lidén C
    Derm Beruf Umwelt; 1986; 34(2):31-6. PubMed ID: 3698833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Proallergens of formaldehyde applied in patch testing of formaldehyde contact allergy.
    Hansen J; Albrechtsen S; Hedegård K
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 1989 Oct; 21(4 Pt 2):838-40. PubMed ID: 2600209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Guinea pig maximization test method - cadmium chloride.
    Wahlberg JE; Boman A
    Contact Dermatitis; 1979 Dec; 5(6):405. PubMed ID: 527337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Active sensitization to elecampane by patch testing with a crude plant extract.
    Aberer W; Hausen BM
    Contact Dermatitis; 1990 Jan; 22(1):53-5. PubMed ID: 2323189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Variations in the quantities of petrolatum applied in patch testing.
    Antoine JL; Lachapelle JM
    Derm Beruf Umwelt; 1988; 36(6):191-4. PubMed ID: 3234271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Determination of irritant dose 50 and irritant time 50 in various study conditions].
    Kühne G; Heise H
    Dermatol Monatsschr; 1988; 174(11):674-80. PubMed ID: 2974810
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Guinea pig maximization test for demonstration of the sensitizing effect of important industrial products].
    Ziegler V; Süss E; Standau H; Hasert K
    Allerg Immunol (Leipz); 1972; 18(3):203-8. PubMed ID: 4269355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Some thoughts on the technique of epicutaneous tests (author's transl)].
    Novák M
    Cesk Dermatol; 1981 Aug; 56(4):235-8. PubMed ID: 7273160
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Incidence of skin affecting lesions in contact dermatitis].
    Wozniak KD; Wienrich I; Pankow B; Böhm W
    Berufsdermatosen; 1971 Jun; 19(3):145-52. PubMed ID: 5088196
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Influence of the vehicle on elicitation of contact allergic reactions to acrylic compounds in the guinea pig.
    Björkner B; Niklasson B
    Contact Dermatitis; 1984 Nov; 11(5):268-78. PubMed ID: 6525820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison testing of soap irritancy using aluminum chamber and standard patch methods.
    Shellow WV; Rapaport MJ
    Contact Dermatitis; 1981 Mar; 7(2):77-9. PubMed ID: 7238015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.