These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
805 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11695769)
1. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy electron beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols. Saiful Huq M; Song H; Andreo P; Houser CJ Med Phys; 2001 Oct; 28(10):2077-87. PubMed ID: 11695769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51 absorbed dose to water protocols in the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams. Huq MS; Andreo P; Song H Phys Med Biol; 2001 Nov; 46(11):2985-3006. PubMed ID: 11720359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy photon beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols. Saiful Huq M; Andreo P Med Phys; 2001 Jan; 28(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 11213922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Calculated absorbed-dose ratios, TG51/TG21, for most widely used cylindrical and parallel-plate ion chambers over a range of photon and electron energies. Tailor RC; Hanson WF Med Phys; 2002 Jul; 29(7):1464-72. PubMed ID: 12148727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of high-energy photon and electron dosimetry for various dosimetry protocols. Araki F; Kubo HD Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):857-68. PubMed ID: 12033582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A dosimetry study comparing NCS report-5, IAEA TRS-381, AAPM TG-51 and IAEA TRS-398 in three clinical electron beam energies. Palmans H; Nafaa L; de Patoul N; Denis JM; Tomsej M; Vynckier S Phys Med Biol; 2003 May; 48(9):1091-107. PubMed ID: 12765324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical reference dosimetry: comparison between AAPM TG-21 and TG-51 protocols. Ding GX; Cygler JE; Kwok CB Med Phys; 2000 Jun; 27(6):1217-25. PubMed ID: 10902550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Protocols for the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams: a comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and previous international codes of practice. International Atomic Energy Agency. Andreo P; Huq MS; Westermark M; Song H; Tilikidis A; DeWerd L; Shortt K Phys Med Biol; 2002 Sep; 47(17):3033-53. PubMed ID: 12361209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing calibration methods of electron beams using plane-parallel chambers with absorbed-dose to water based protocols. Stewart KJ; Seuntjens JP Med Phys; 2002 Mar; 29(3):284-9. PubMed ID: 11929010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Absorbed dose to water based dosimetry versus air kerma based dosimetry for high-energy photon beams: an experimental study. Palmans H; Nafaa L; De JJ; Gillis S; Hoornaert MT; Martens C; Piessens M; Thierens H; Van der Plaetsen A; Vynckier S Phys Med Biol; 2002 Feb; 47(3):421-40. PubMed ID: 11848121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The IPEM code of practice for electron dosimetry for radiotherapy beams of initial energy from 4 to 25 MeV based on an absorbed dose to water calibration. Thwaites DI; DuSautoy AR; Jordan T; McEwen MR; Nisbet A; Nahum AE; Pitchford WG; Phys Med Biol; 2003 Sep; 48(18):2929-70. PubMed ID: 14529204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams. Almond PR; Biggs PJ; Coursey BM; Hanson WF; Huq MS; Nath R; Rogers DW Med Phys; 1999 Sep; 26(9):1847-70. PubMed ID: 10505874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison and uncertainty evaluation of different calibration protocols and ionization chambers for low-energy surface brachytherapy dosimetry. Candela-Juan C; Vijande J; García-Martínez T; Niatsetski Y; Nauta G; Schuurman J; Ouhib Z; Ballester F; Perez-Calatayud J Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4954-64. PubMed ID: 26233221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ionization chamber dosimetry of proton beams using cylindrical and plane parallel chambers. Nw versus Nk ion chamber calibrations. Medin J; Andreo P; Grusell E; Mattsson O; Montelius A; Roos M Phys Med Biol; 1995 Jul; 40(7):1161-76. PubMed ID: 7568375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Recommendations for clinical electron beam dosimetry: supplement to the recommendations of Task Group 25. Gerbi BJ; Antolak JA; Deibel FC; Followill DS; Herman MG; Higgins PD; Huq MS; Mihailidis DN; Yorke ED; Hogstrom KR; Khan FM Med Phys; 2009 Jul; 36(7):3239-79. PubMed ID: 19673223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. kQ factors for ionization chamber dosimetry in clinical proton beams. Vatnitsky SM; Siebers JV; Miller DW Med Phys; 1996 Jan; 23(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 8700030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Calibration of low-energy electron beams from a mobile linear accelerator with plane-parallel chambers using both TG-51 and TG-21 protocols. Beddar AS; Tailor RC Phys Med Biol; 2004 Apr; 49(8):N105-10. PubMed ID: 15152696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of methods for calibrating parallel-plate chambers/. Reft CS; Kuchnir FT; DeWerd LA; Micka J; Attix FH Med Phys; 1994 Dec; 21(12):1953-7. PubMed ID: 7700203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Verification of absorbed doses determined with thimble and parallel-plate ionization chambers in clinical electron beams using ferrous sulphate dosimetry. Van der Plaetsen A; Seuntjens J; Thierens H; Vynckier S Med Phys; 1994 Jan; 21(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 8164587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The calibration and use of plane-parallel ionization chambers for dosimetry of electron beams: an extension of the 1983 AAPM protocol report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 39. Almond PR; Attix FH; Humphries LJ; Kubo H; Nath R; Goetsch S; Rogers DW Med Phys; 1994 Aug; 21(8):1251-60. PubMed ID: 7799867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]