2309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11696734)
1. Lack of association of prostate carcinoma nuclear grading with prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Zhou M; Hayasaka S; Taylor JM; Shah R; Proverbs-Singh T; Manley S; Rubin MA
J Urol; 2001 Dec; 166(6):2193-7. PubMed ID: 11696734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improved risk stratification for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy using a novel risk group system based on prostate specific antigen density and biopsy Gleason score.
Freedland SJ; Wieder JA; Jack GS; Dorey F; deKernion JB; Aronson WJ
J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 12050502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Should we replace the Gleason score with the amount of high-grade prostate cancer?
Vis AN; Roemeling S; Kranse R; Schröder FH; van der Kwast TH
Eur Urol; 2007 Apr; 51(4):931-9. PubMed ID: 16935413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The relationship between the extent of surgical margin positivity and prostate specific antigen recurrence in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Marks RA; Koch MO; Lopez-Beltran A; Montironi R; Juliar BE; Cheng L
Hum Pathol; 2007 Aug; 38(8):1207-11. PubMed ID: 17490720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preoperative serum prostate specific antigen does not reflect biochemical failure rates after radical prostatectomy in men with large volume cancers.
Noguchi M; Stamey TA; McNeal JE; Yemoto CM
J Urol; 2000 Nov; 164(5):1596-600. PubMed ID: 11025712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The percent of cores positive for cancer in prostate needle biopsy specimens is strongly predictive of tumor stage and volume at radical prostatectomy.
Sebo TJ; Bock BJ; Cheville JC; Lohse C; Wollan P; Zincke H
J Urol; 2000 Jan; 163(1):174-8. PubMed ID: 10604340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lymphovascular invasion is an independent prognostic factor in prostatic adenocarcinoma.
Cheng L; Jones TD; Lin H; Eble JN; Zeng G; Carr MD; Koch MO
J Urol; 2005 Dec; 174(6):2181-5. PubMed ID: 16280760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of Gleason score, prostate specific antigen, seminal vesicle and margin status to predict biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.
Blute ML; Bergstralh EJ; Iocca A; Scherer B; Zincke H
J Urol; 2001 Jan; 165(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 11125379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prediction of pathological stage in patients with clinical stage T1c prostate cancer: the new challenge.
Veltri RW; Miller MC; Mangold LA; O'Dowd GJ; Epstein JI; Partin AW
J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):100-4. PubMed ID: 12050500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biochemical (prostate specific antigen) recurrence probability following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer.
Han M; Partin AW; Zahurak M; Piantadosi S; Epstein JI; Walsh PC
J Urol; 2003 Feb; 169(2):517-23. PubMed ID: 12544300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tertiary Gleason pattern 5 is a powerful predictor of biochemical relapse in patients with Gleason score 7 prostatic adenocarcinoma.
Hattab EM; Koch MO; Eble JN; Lin H; Cheng L
J Urol; 2006 May; 175(5):1695-9; discussion 1699. PubMed ID: 16600733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radical prostatectomy for pathological Gleason 8 or greater prostate cancer: influence of concomitant pathological variables.
Lau WK; Bergstralh EJ; Blute ML; Slezak JM; Zincke H
J Urol; 2002 Jan; 167(1):117-22. PubMed ID: 11743287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radical prostatectomy for incidental (stage T1a-T1b) prostate cancer: analysis of predictors for residual disease and biochemical recurrence.
Capitanio U; Scattoni V; Freschi M; Briganti A; Salonia A; Gallina A; Colombo R; Karakiewicz PI; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
Eur Urol; 2008 Jul; 54(1):118-25. PubMed ID: 18314255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Percent of cores positive for cancer is a better preoperative predictor of cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy than prostate specific antigen.
San Francisco IF; Regan MM; Olumi AF; DeWolf WC
J Urol; 2004 Apr; 171(4):1492-9. PubMed ID: 15017206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Percent free prostate specific antigen is not an independent predictor of organ confinement or prostate specific antigen recurrence in unscreened patients with localized prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy.
Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI; Cagiannos I; Hammerer PG; Haese A; Palisaar J; Huland E; Scardino PT; Kattan MW; Huland H
J Urol; 2002 Mar; 167(3):1306-9. PubMed ID: 11832719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prognostic factors for survival of patients with pathological Gleason score 7 prostate cancer: differences in outcome between primary Gleason grades 3 and 4.
Lau WK; Blute ML; Bostwick DG; Weaver AL; Sebo TJ; Zincke H
J Urol; 2001 Nov; 166(5):1692-7. PubMed ID: 11586204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Risk factors of positive surgical margin and biochemical recurrence of patients treated with radical prostatectomy: a single-center 10-year report.
Li K; Li H; Yang Y; Ian LH; Pun WH; Ho SF
Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Apr; 124(7):1001-5. PubMed ID: 21542957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The percentage of prostate needle biopsy cores with carcinoma from the more involved side of the biopsy as a predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) database.
Freedland SJ; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Dorey F; Presti JC
Cancer; 2003 Dec; 98(11):2344-50. PubMed ID: 14635068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Gleason score 7 prostate cancer on needle biopsy: is the prognostic difference in Gleason scores 4 + 3 and 3 + 4 independent of the number of involved cores?
Makarov DV; Sanderson H; Partin AW; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2002 Jun; 167(6):2440-2. PubMed ID: 11992053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
