170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11696917)
1. Clinical study of the sensitivity and dynamic range of three digital systems, E-speed film and digitized film.
Bóscolo FN; Oliveira AE; Almeida SM; Haiter CF; Haiter Neto F
Braz Dent J; 2001; 12(3):191-5. PubMed ID: 11696917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of image quality in dental radiography, part 2: optimum exposure conditions for detection of small mass changes in 6 intraoral radiography systems.
Yoshiura K; Kawazu T; Chikui T; Tatsumi M; Tokumori K; Tanaka T; Kanda S
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Jan; 87(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 9927091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of the response of storage phosphor and film radiography to small variations in X-ray exposure.
Hildebolt CF; Fletcher G; Yokoyama-Crothers N; Conover GL; Vannier MW
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 May; 26(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 9442600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A laboratory comparison of three imaging systems for image quality and radiation exposure characteristics.
Bhaskaran V; Qualtrough AJ; Rushton VE; Worthington HV; Horner K
Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):645-52. PubMed ID: 16104978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detection of approximal caries with a storage phosphor system. A comparison of enhanced digital images with dental X-ray film.
Møystad A; Svanaes DB; Risnes S; Larheim TA; Gröndahl HG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Sep; 25(4):202-6. PubMed ID: 9084274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Some characteristics of solid-state and photo-stimulable phosphor detectors for intra-oral radiography.
Borg E
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 139():i-viii, 1-67. PubMed ID: 10635104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of linear measurements made from storage phosphor and dental radiographs.
Conover GL; Hildebolt CF; Yokoyama-Crothers N
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Nov; 25(5):268-73. PubMed ID: 9161181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic accuracy of in vitro panoramic radiographs depending on the exposure.
Kaeppler G; Dietz K; Reinert S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Feb; 36(2):68-74. PubMed ID: 17403882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vitro perception of low-contrast features in digital, film, and digitized dental radiographs: a receiver operating characteristic analysis.
Grassl U; Schulze RK
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 May; 103(5):694-701. PubMed ID: 17466887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The dynamic range of digital radiographic systems: dose reduction or risk of overexposure?
Berkhout WE; Beuger DA; Sanderink GC; van der Stelt PF
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 15140814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quality of film-based and digital panoramic radiography.
Molander B; Gröndahl HG; Ekestubbe A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 15140820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optical densities of dental resin composites: a comparison of CCD, storage phosphor, and Ektaspeed plus radiographic film.
Farman TT; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Goldsmith LJ
Gen Dent; 1996; 44(6):532-7. PubMed ID: 9515395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of tube potential setting and dose on the visibility of lesions in intraoral radiography.
Kaeppler G; Dietz K; Reinert S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Feb; 36(2):75-9. PubMed ID: 17403883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Clinical and comparative study of the image quality of 3 digital radiographic systems, E-speed film and digitalized film]].
Bóscolo FN; de Oliveira AE; de Almeida SM; Haiter CF; Haiter Neto F
Pesqui Odontol Bras; 2001; 15(4):327-33. PubMed ID: 11787321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the psychophysical properties of various intraoral film and digital systems by means of the perceptibility curve test.
Yoshiura K; Welander U; McDavid WD; Li G; Shi XQ; Nakayama E; Shimizu M; Okamura K; Kanda S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):98-102. PubMed ID: 15314001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of image quality in dental radiography, part 1: phantom validity.
Yoshiura K; Kawazu T; Chikui T; Tatsumi M; Tokumori K; Tanaka T; Kanda S
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Jan; 87(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 9927090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An ex vivo comparison of conventional and digital radiography for perceived image quality of root fillings.
Akdeniz BG; Soğur E
Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):397-401. PubMed ID: 15910475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative study of two digital radiographic storage phosphor systems.
Oliveira AE; de Almeida SM; Paganini GA; Haiter Neto F; Bóscolo FN
Braz Dent J; 2000; 11(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 11210259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of a photostimulable phosphor system with film for dental radiology.
Huda W; Rill LN; Benn DK; Pettigrew JC
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Jun; 83(6):725-31. PubMed ID: 9195631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intraoral radiology in general dental practices - a comparison of digital and film-based X-ray systems with regard to radiation protection and dose reduction.
Anissi HD; Geibel MA
Rofo; 2014 Aug; 186(8):762-7. PubMed ID: 24648236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
