These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11696917)

  • 21. Discrimination between restorative dental materials by their radiopacity measured in film radiographs and digital images.
    Wenzel A; Hintze H; Hørsted-Bindslev P
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 1998 Jun; 16(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 9922755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reliability of CCD and CMOS (APS) digital sensors compared with D and E-plus-speed films in the detection of dental pathology: an in vitro study.
    Tsau JN; Mupparapu M
    Penn Dent J (Phila); 2001; 101():10-1. PubMed ID: 15484636
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An evaluation of the Sens-A-Ray digital dental imaging system.
    McDonnell D; Price C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Aug; 22(3):121-6. PubMed ID: 8299829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Accuracy of caries detection with four storage phosphor systems and E-speed radiographs.
    Hintze H; Wenzel A; Frydenberg M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 May; 31(3):170-5. PubMed ID: 12058264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Detectability of chemically induced periapical lesions by limited cone beam computed tomography, intra-oral digital and conventional film radiography.
    Sogur E; Baksi BG; Gröndahl HG; Lomcali G; Sen BH
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Oct; 38(7):458-64. PubMed ID: 19767516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. On the dynamic range of different X-ray photon detectors in intra-oral radiography. A comparison of image quality in film, charge-coupled device and storage phosphor systems.
    Borg E; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Apr; 25(2):82-8. PubMed ID: 9446978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of conventional film with different digital and digitally filtered images in the detection of simulated internal resorption cavities--an ex vivo study in human cadaver jaws.
    Kamburoğlu K; Barenboim SF; Kaffe I
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Jun; 105(6):790-7. PubMed ID: 17942339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparison of a film-based and a direct digital dental radiographic system using a proximal caries model.
    Price C; Ergül N
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Jan; 26(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 9446990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Radiation dosage reduction in general dental practice using digital intraoral radiographic systems.
    Hayakawa Y; Shibuya H; Ota Y; Kuroyanagi K
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1997 Feb; 38(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 9566150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Marginal bone level buccal to mandibular molars in digital radiographs from charge-coupled device and storage phosphor systems. An in vitro study.
    Borg E; Gröndahl K; Gröndahl HG
    J Clin Periodontol; 1997 May; 24(5):306-12. PubMed ID: 9178109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Extraoral radiographic imaging of primary caries.
    Clifton TL; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Jul; 27(4):193-8. PubMed ID: 9780894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of observer performance in determining the position of endodontic files with physical measures in the evaluation of dental X-ray imaging systems.
    Vandre RH; Pajak JC; Abdel-Nabi H; Farman TT; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jul; 29(4):216-22. PubMed ID: 10918454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of imaging system and exposure on accurate detection of the second mesio-buccal canal in maxillary molar teeth.
    Ramamurthy R; Scheetz JP; Clark SJ; Farman AG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Dec; 102(6):796-802. PubMed ID: 17138184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Image quality in digital radiographic systems.
    de Almeida SM; de Oliveira AE; Ferreira RI; Bóscolo FN
    Braz Dent J; 2003; 14(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 12964659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Contrast perception in digitized panoramic radiographs compared with their film-based origin.
    Schulze RK; Rosing ST; D'Hoedt B
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 Sep; 94(3):388-94. PubMed ID: 12324798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Accuracy of film-based, digital, and enhanced digital images for endodontic length determination.
    Woolhiser GA; Brand JW; Hoen MM; Geist JR; Pikula AA; Pink FE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Apr; 99(4):499-504. PubMed ID: 15772601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Variations in film exposure, effective kVp, and HVL among thirty-five dental x-ray units.
    Preece JW; Jensen CW
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1983 Dec; 56(6):655-61. PubMed ID: 6581465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Quality of digital pre-implant tomography: comparison of film-screen images with storage phosphor images at normal and low dose.
    Ekestubbe A; Gröndahl HG; Molander B
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Sep; 32(5):322-6. PubMed ID: 14709608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Imaging of root canal fillings: a comparison of subjective image quality between limited cone-beam CT, storage phosphor and film radiography.
    Soğur E; Baksi BG; Gröndahl HG
    Int Endod J; 2007 Mar; 40(3):179-85. PubMed ID: 17305694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of the automatic exposure compensation on the proximal caries diagnosis.
    Yoshiura K; Nakayama E; Shimizu M; Goto TK; Chikui T; Kawazu T; Okamura K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):140-4. PubMed ID: 15897283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.