These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11696918)

  • 21. Microleakage of direct and indirect composite restorations with three dentin bonding agents.
    Alavi AA; Kianimanesh N
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 11817466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Fatigue of resin-bonded amalgam restorations.
    Bonilla E; White SN
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(3):122-6. PubMed ID: 9011846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Microleakage of dentin bonding systems used with spherical and admixed amalgams.
    Korale ME; Meiers JC
    Am J Dent; 1996 Dec; 9(6):249-52. PubMed ID: 9545878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effect of two different polishing techniques on microleakage of new composites in Class V restorations.
    Yalçin F; Korkmaz Y; Başeren M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):18-25. PubMed ID: 17091136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Microleakage of hydrophilic adhesive systems in Class V composite restorations.
    Amaral CM; Hara AT; Pimenta LA; Rodrigues AL
    Am J Dent; 2001 Feb; 14(1):31-3. PubMed ID: 11806477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Microleakage of bonding agents with wet and dry bonding techniques.
    Saunders WP; Saunders EM
    Am J Dent; 1996 Feb; 9(1):34-6. PubMed ID: 9002813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Class I occlusal composite resin restorations: in vivo post-operative sensitivity, wall adaptation, and microleakage.
    Opdam NJ; Feilzer AJ; Roeters JJ; Smale I
    Am J Dent; 1998 Oct; 11(5):229-34. PubMed ID: 10388382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Microleakage of class 2 Superbond-lined composite restorations with and without a cervical amalgam base.
    Hovav S; Holan G; Lewinstein I; Fuks AB
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(2):63-7. PubMed ID: 8700773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Microleakage of new dentin bonding systems using human and bovine teeth.
    Reeves GW; Fitchie JG; Hembree JH; Puckett AD
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(6):230-5. PubMed ID: 8710704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Microleakage of a dental amalgam alloy bonding agent.
    Saiku JM; St Germain HA; Meiers JC
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(5):172-8. PubMed ID: 8152986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
    de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Microleakage of two new dentin adhesives.
    Linden JJ; Swift EJ
    Am J Dent; 1994 Feb; 7(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 9115676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Microleakage of Class II box-type composite restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Roeters JJ; Burgersdijk RC
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):160-4. PubMed ID: 10388369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A comparison of amalgam microleakage with a 4-META liner and copal varnish.
    Moore DS; Johnson WW; Kaplan I
    Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(5):461-6. PubMed ID: 8595104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations using five simplified adhesive systems.
    Cardoso PE; Placido E; Francci CE; Perdigão J
    Am J Dent; 1999 Dec; 12(6):291-4. PubMed ID: 10850249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Microleakage of amalgam cavity treatment systems: an in vitro evaluation.
    Morrow LA; Wilson NH; Setcos JC; Watts DC
    Am J Dent; 2002 Aug; 15(4):262-7. PubMed ID: 12572646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Bonded amalgam restorations: microleakage and tensile bond strength evaluation.
    Muniz M; Quioca J; Dolci GS; Reis A; Loguercio AD
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(2):228-33. PubMed ID: 15853109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of finishing time and techniques on marginal sealing ability of two composite restorative materials.
    Lopes GC; Franke M; Maia HP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 12239477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Microleakage of amalgam restorations using Amalgambond and Copalite.
    Edgren BN; Denehy GE
    Am J Dent; 1992 Dec; 5(6):296-8. PubMed ID: 1304174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.