216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11697392)
1. Thinking clearly about research risk: implications of the work of Benjamin Freedman.
Weijer C
IRB; 1999; 21(6):1-5. PubMed ID: 11697392
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Worlds apart.
Chalmers TC; MacDonald MG
Trial; 1975; 11(6):27-28+. PubMed ID: 11662205
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Regulation of research on the decisionally impaired: history and gaps in the current regulatory system.
Moreno JD
J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 15573427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Considering experimentation and elusive truth: informed consent made difficult.
Brodeur D
Issues (St Louis Mo); 1992; 7(2):1-8. PubMed ID: 11659444
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Ethical considerations in human experimentation.
Bernstein JE
J Clin Pharmacol New Drugs; 1975; 15(8-9):579-90. PubMed ID: 11661224
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Can children be enrolled in a placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial of synthetic growth hormone?
Prentice ED; Antonson DL; Jameton A; Graber B; Sears T
IRB; 1989; 11(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 11659085
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Fetal experimentation and federal regulation.
Horan DJ
Villanova Law Rev; 1977 Jan; 22(2):325-56. PubMed ID: 11664796
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Law No. 88-1138 of 20 Dec 1988 on the Protection of Persons Participating in Biomedical Research.
France
Int Dig Health Legis; 1989; 40(1):109-13. PubMed ID: 11659174
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The law and human experimentation.
Simmonds R
Univ Ghana Law J; 1973; 10(2):81-102. PubMed ID: 11663022
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. HEW proposed policy on the protection of human subjects: experimentation and the institutionalized mentally disabled.
Wash Univ Law Q; 1975; 1975(3):745-74. PubMed ID: 11662989
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Non-therapeutic medical research involving human subjects.
Bloom MJ
Syracuse Law Rev; 1973; 24():1067-1099. PubMed ID: 11664224
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Fetal experimentation: legal implications of an ethical conundrum.
Wilson JP
Denver Law J; 1976; 53(4):581-642. PubMed ID: 11664590
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. An ethical evaluation of federal norms for fetal experimentation.
O'Rourke KD
Linacre Q; 1976 Feb; 43(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 11663671
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact on fetal research of the report of the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research.
Levine RJ
Villanova Law Rev; 1977 Jan; 22(2):367-83. PubMed ID: 11664798
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Proposed regulations on fetal research--and some reactions!
Contemp Ob Gyn; 1975 Nov; 6(5):31-3. PubMed ID: 11664652
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The subject is children.
Hiatt F
Trial; 1975; 11(6):19+. PubMed ID: 11662203
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The law governing human experimentation in Quebec.
Kouri RP
Rev Droit; 1991; 22(1):77-108. PubMed ID: 11659965
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. In harm's way: research subjects who are decisionally impaired.
Sundram CJ
J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):36-65. PubMed ID: 15573429
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Human experimentation: the regulation controversy.
Society; 1975; 13(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 11662982
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The politics of informed consent.
Weston HB
Natl Forum; 1978; 58(4):23-6. PubMed ID: 11661867
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
