These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

398 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11698902)

  • 1. Biomechanical evaluation of stand-alone interbody fusion cages in the cervical spine.
    Shimamoto N; Cunningham BW; Dmitriev AE; Minami A; McAfee PC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Oct; 26(19):E432-6. PubMed ID: 11698902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical comparison of bioabsorbable cervical spine interbody fusion cages.
    Pflugmacher R; Schleicher P; Gumnior S; Turan O; Scholz M; Eindorf T; Haas NP; Kandziora F
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Aug; 29(16):1717-22. PubMed ID: 15303013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomechanical comparison of cervical interbody cage versus structural bone graft.
    Greene DL; Crawford NR; Chamberlain RH; Park SC; Crandall D
    Spine J; 2003; 3(4):262-9. PubMed ID: 14589184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanics of an integrated interbody device versus ACDF anterior locking plate in a single-level cervical spine fusion construct.
    Stein MI; Nayak AN; Gaskins RB; Cabezas AF; Santoni BG; Castellvi AE
    Spine J; 2014 Jan; 14(1):128-36. PubMed ID: 24231054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical comparison of cervical spine interbody fusion cages.
    Kandziora F; Pflugmacher R; Schäfer J; Born C; Duda G; Haas NP; Mittlmeier T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Sep; 26(17):1850-7. PubMed ID: 11568693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical comparison of a two-level anterior discectomy and a one-level corpectomy, combined with fusion and anterior plate reconstruction in the cervical spine.
    Aghayev K; Doulgeris JJ; Gonzalez-Blohm SA; Eleraky M; Lee WE; Vrionis FD
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2014 Jan; 29(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 24239024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A new stand-alone cervical anterior interbody fusion device: biomechanical comparison with established anterior cervical fixation devices.
    Scholz M; Reyes PM; Schleicher P; Sawa AG; Baek S; Kandziora F; Marciano FF; Crawford NR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 19139665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical Stability Analysis of a Stand-alone Cage, Static and Rotational-dynamic Plate in a Two-level Cervical Fusion Construct.
    Tsitsopoulos PP; Voronov LI; Zindrick MR; Carandang G; Havey RM; Ghanayem AJ; Patwardhan AG
    Orthop Surg; 2017 Aug; 9(3):290-295. PubMed ID: 28960818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Enhancement of stability following anterior cervical corpectomy: a biomechanical study.
    Singh K; Vaccaro AR; Kim J; Lorenz EP; Lim TH; An HS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Apr; 29(8):845-9. PubMed ID: 15082982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bioabsorbable interbody cages in a sheep cervical spine fusion model.
    Kandziora F; Pflugmacher R; Scholz M; Eindorf T; Schnake KJ; Haas NP
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Sep; 29(17):1845-55; discussion 1856. PubMed ID: 15534403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical evaluation of a newly developed monocortical expansion screw for use in anterior internal fixation of the cervical spine. In vitro comparison with two established internal fixation systems.
    Richter M; Wilke HJ; Kluger P; Claes L; Puhl W
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Feb; 24(3):207-12. PubMed ID: 10025014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical comparison of anterior cervical spine instrumentation techniques with and without supplemental posterior fusion after different corpectomy and discectomy combinations: Laboratory investigation.
    Setzer M; Eleraky M; Johnson WM; Aghayev K; Tran ND; Vrionis FD
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jun; 16(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 22423633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics.
    Cunningham BW; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC
    Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20362252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a locked plate and wedged graft effectively stabilizes flexion-distraction stage-3 injury in the lower cervical spine: a biomechanical study.
    Paxinos O; Ghanayem AJ; Zindrick MR; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Hadjipavlou A; Patwardhan AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(1):E9-15. PubMed ID: 19127153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of stiffness and failure load of two cervical spine fixation techniques in an in vitro human model.
    Hart R; Gillard J; Prem S; Shea M; Kitchel S
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2005 Feb; 18 Suppl():S115-8. PubMed ID: 15699796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical evaluation of a low-profile, anchored cervical interbody spacer device at the index level or adjacent to plated fusion.
    Balaram AK; Ghanayem AJ; OʼLeary PT; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Abjornson C; Patwardhan AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Jun; 39(13):E763-9. PubMed ID: 24732831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical analysis of an interbody cage with three integrated cancellous lag screws in a two-level cervical spine fusion construct: an in vitro study.
    Nayak AN; Stein MI; James CR; Gaskins RB; Cabezas AF; Adu-Lartey M; Castellvi AE; Santoni BG
    Spine J; 2014 Dec; 14(12):3002-10. PubMed ID: 24948039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can an Endplate-conformed Cervical Cage Provide a Better Biomechanical Environment than a Typical Non-conformed Cage?: A Finite Element Model and Cadaver Study.
    Zhang F; Xu HC; Yin B; Xia XL; Ma XS; Wang HL; Yin J; Shao MH; Lyu FZ; Jiang JY
    Orthop Surg; 2016 Aug; 8(3):367-76. PubMed ID: 27627721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the flexibility of the lumbar spine.
    Harris BM; Hilibrand AS; Savas PE; Pellegrino A; Vaccaro AR; Siegler S; Albert TJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Feb; 29(4):E65-70. PubMed ID: 15094547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Local and global subaxial cervical spine biomechanics after single-level fusion or cervical arthroplasty.
    Finn MA; Brodke DS; Daubs M; Patel A; Bachus KN
    Eur Spine J; 2009 Oct; 18(10):1520-7. PubMed ID: 19585159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.