212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11699309)
1. [Biomechanical stability with a new artificial vertebral body implant. 3-dimensional movement analysis of instrumented human vertebral segments].
Knop C; Lange U; Bastian L; Blauth M
Unfallchirurg; 2001 Oct; 104(10):984-97. PubMed ID: 11699309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Three-dimensional motion analysis with Synex. Comparative biomechanical test series with a new vertebral body replacement for the thoracolumbar spine.
Knop C; Lange U; Bastian L; Blauth M
Eur Spine J; 2000 Dec; 9(6):472-85. PubMed ID: 11189915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Comparative biomechanical compression trials with a new vertebral prosthetic implant].
Knop C; Lange U; Bastian L; Oeser M; Blauth M
Unfallchirurg; 2001 Jan; 104(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 11381759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical compression tests with a new implant for thoracolumbar vertebral body replacement.
Knop C; Lange U; Bastian L; Oeser M; Blauth M
Eur Spine J; 2001 Feb; 10(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 11276833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Replacement of the vertebral body with an expansion implant (Synex)].
Krbec M; Stulík J; Tichý V
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2002; 69(3):158-62. PubMed ID: 12125217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical comparison of expandable cages for vertebral body replacement in the thoracolumbar spine.
Pflugmacher R; Schleicher P; Schaefer J; Scholz M; Ludwig K; Khodadadyan-Klostermann C; Haas NP; Kandziora F
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Jul; 29(13):1413-9. PubMed ID: 15223931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Vertebral body replacement with a Synex implant].
Zeman J; Matĕjka J; Belatka J; Vodicka J
Rozhl Chir; 2007 May; 86(5):263-7. PubMed ID: 17634016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stability potential of spinal instrumentations in tumor vertebral body replacement surgery.
Vahldiek MJ; Panjabi MM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Mar; 23(5):543-50. PubMed ID: 9530785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [An improved vertebral body replacement for the thoracolumbar spine. A biomechanical in vitro test on human lumbar vertebral bodies].
Reinhold M; Schmölz W; Canto F; Krappinger D; Blauth M; Knop C
Unfallchirurg; 2007 Apr; 110(4):327-33. PubMed ID: 17211598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Expandable cages: biomechanical comparison of different cages for ventral spondylodesis in the thoracolumbar spine].
Khodadadyan-Klostermann C; Schaefer J; Schleicher P; Pflugmacher R; Eindorf T; Haas NP; Kandziora F
Chirurg; 2004 Jul; 75(7):694-701. PubMed ID: 15258751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Two in vivo surgical approaches for lumbar corpectomy using allograft and a metallic implant: a controlled clinical and biomechanical study.
Huang P; Gupta MC; Sarigul-Klijn N; Hazelwood S
Spine J; 2006; 6(6):648-58. PubMed ID: 17088195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A new distractable implant for vertebral body replacement: biomechanical testing of four implants for the thoracolumbar spine.
Reinhold M; Schmoelz W; Canto F; Krappinger D; Blauth M; Knop C
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2009 Oct; 129(10):1375-82. PubMed ID: 19190924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative stability of the "Internal Fixator" and the "Universal Spine System" and the effect of crosslinking transfixating systems. A biomechanical in vitro study.
Arand M; Wilke HJ; Schultheiss M; Hartwig E; Kinzl L; Claes L
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2000 Nov; 45(11):311-6. PubMed ID: 11155532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical evaluation of a simulated T-9 burst fracture of the thoracic spine with an intact rib cage.
Perry TG; Mageswaran P; Colbrunn RW; Bonner TF; Francis T; McLain RF
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Sep; 21(3):481-8. PubMed ID: 24949903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Stability of ventral, dorsal and combined spondylodesis in vertebral body prosthesis implantation].
Vahldiek M; Gossè F; Panjabi MM
Orthopade; 2002 May; 31(5):508-13. PubMed ID: 12089802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective multicenter study with a new implant for thoracolumbar vertebral body replacement.
Lange U; Knop C; Bastian L; Blauth M
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2003 Jun; 123(5):203-8. PubMed ID: 12712359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical evaluation of anterior thoracolumbar spinal instrumentation.
An HS; Lim TH; You JW; Hong JH; Eck J; McGrady L
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Sep; 20(18):1979-83. PubMed ID: 8578371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Spinal instrumentation after complete resection of the last lumbar vertebra: an in vitro biomechanical study after L5 spondylectomy.
Bartanusz V; Muzumdar A; Hussain M; Moldavsky M; Bucklen B; Khalil S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jun; 36(13):1017-21. PubMed ID: 21224772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Angular stable anterior plating following thoracolumbar corpectomy reveals superior segmental stability compared to conventional polyaxial plate fixation.
Disch AC; Knop C; Schaser KD; Blauth M; Schmoelz W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jun; 33(13):1429-37. PubMed ID: 18520938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Design and preliminary biomechanical analysis of a novel motion preservation device for lumbar spinal disease after vertebral corpectomy.
Liu J; He X; Gao Z; Niu B; Lv D; Gao Y
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2019 Jun; 139(6):751-760. PubMed ID: 30747259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
