972 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11699470)
1. Comparison of 2 clinical techniques for treatment of gingival recession.
Wang HL; Bunyaratavej P; Labadie M; Shyr Y; MacNeil RL
J Periodontol; 2001 Oct; 72(10):1301-11. PubMed ID: 11699470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Treatment of gingival recessions by combined periodontal regenerative technique, guided tissue regeneration, and subpedicle connective tissue graft. A comparative clinical study.
Paolantonio M
J Periodontol; 2002 Jan; 73(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 11846201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Root coverage stability of the subepithelial connective tissue graft and guided tissue regeneration: a 30-month follow-up clinical trial.
Rosetti EP; Marcantonio E; Zuza EP; Marcantonio RA
J Dent; 2013 Feb; 41(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 22652007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development and clinical evaluation of a root coverage procedure using a collagen barrier membrane.
Shieh AT; Wang HL; O'Neal R; Glickman GN; MacNeil RL
J Periodontol; 1997 Aug; 68(8):770-8. PubMed ID: 9287069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Treatment of gingival recession using a collagen membrane with or without the use of demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft for space maintenance.
Kimble KM; Eber RM; Soehren S; Shyr Y; Wang HL
J Periodontol; 2004 Feb; 75(2):210-20. PubMed ID: 15068108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative clinical study of guided tissue regeneration with a bioabsorbable bilayer collagen membrane and subepithelial connective tissue graft.
Romagna-Genon C
J Periodontol; 2001 Sep; 72(9):1258-64. PubMed ID: 11577960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Significance of the epithelial collar on the subepithelial connective tissue graft.
Byun HY; Oh TJ; Abuhussein HM; Yamashita J; Soehren SE; Wang HL
J Periodontol; 2009 Jun; 80(6):924-32. PubMed ID: 19485822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of enamel matrix derivative on collagen guided tissue regeneration-based root coverage procedure.
Trabulsi M; Oh TJ; Eber R; Weber D; Wang HL
J Periodontol; 2004 Nov; 75(11):1446-57. PubMed ID: 15633319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Surgical microscope may enhance root coverage with subepithelial connective tissue graft: a randomized-controlled clinical trial.
Bittencourt S; Del Peloso Ribeiro E; Sallum EA; Nociti FH; Casati MZ
J Periodontol; 2012 Jun; 83(6):721-30. PubMed ID: 21870975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Treatment of gingival recession: comparative study between subepithelial connective tissue graft and guided tissue regeneration.
Rosetti EP; Marcantonio RA; Rossa C; Chaves ES; Goissis G; Marcantonio E
J Periodontol; 2000 Sep; 71(9):1441-7. PubMed ID: 11022773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative clinical study of a bioabsorbable membrane and subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of human gingival recession.
Borghetti A; Glise JM; Monnet-Corti V; Dejou J
J Periodontol; 1999 Feb; 70(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10102549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative 6-month clinical study of a semilunar coronally positioned flap and subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of gingival recession.
Bittencourt S; Del Peloso Ribeiro E; Sallum EA; Sallum AW; Nociti FH; Casati MZ
J Periodontol; 2006 Feb; 77(2):174-81. PubMed ID: 16460241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Root coverage using the coronally positioned flap with or without a subepithelial connective tissue graft.
da Silva RC; Joly JC; de Lima AF; Tatakis DN
J Periodontol; 2004 Mar; 75(3):413-9. PubMed ID: 15088880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of bone grafts for the enhancement of a GTR-based root coverage procedure: a pilot case study.
Wang HL; Kimble K; Eber R
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2002 Apr; 22(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 12019707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Subpedicle connective tissue graft versus guided tissue regeneration with bioabsorbable membrane in the treatment of human gingival recession defects.
Trombelli L; Scabbia A; Tatakis DN; Calura G
J Periodontol; 1998 Nov; 69(11):1271-7. PubMed ID: 9848537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Harvesting technique using a mucotome and modified surgical procedure for root coverage with enamel matrix derivatives with and without a connective tissue graft.
Gunay H; Dogan S; Geurtsen W
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Oct; 28(5):497-507. PubMed ID: 18991001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A 6-month comparative clinical study of a conventional and a new surgical approach for root coverage with acellular dermal matrix.
Barros RR; Novaes AB; Grisi MF; Souza SL; Taba MJ; Palioto DB
J Periodontol; 2004 Oct; 75(10):1350-6. PubMed ID: 15562912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of 2 techniques of subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of gingival recessions.
Cordioli G; Mortarino C; Chierico A; Grusovin MG; Majzoub Z
J Periodontol; 2001 Nov; 72(11):1470-6. PubMed ID: 11759857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative clinical study of a subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix graft for the treatment of gingival recessions: six- to 12-month changes.
de Souza SL; Novaes AB; Grisi DC; Taba M; Grisi MF; de Andrade PF
J Int Acad Periodontol; 2008 Jul; 10(3):87-94. PubMed ID: 18714934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Treatment of gingival recession: comparison of two techniques of subepithelial connective tissue graft.
Tözüm TF; Keçeli HG; Güncü GN; Hatipoğlu H; Sengün D
J Periodontol; 2005 Nov; 76(11):1842-8. PubMed ID: 16274302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
