67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11699847)
1. The "differential diagnosis" for multiple diseases: comparison with the binary-truth state experiment in two empirical studies.
Obuchowski NA; Applegate KE; Goske MJ; Arheart KL; Myers MT; Morrison S
Acad Radiol; 2001 Oct; 8(10):947-54. PubMed ID: 11699847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of correlated receiver operating characteristic curves derived from repeated diagnostic test data.
Zou KH
Acad Radiol; 2001 Mar; 8(3):225-33. PubMed ID: 11249086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reducing the number of reader interpretations in MRMC studies.
Obuchowski NA
Acad Radiol; 2009 Feb; 16(2):209-17. PubMed ID: 19124107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hierarchical models for ROC curve summary measures: design and analysis of multi-reader, multi-modality studies of medical tests.
Wang F; Gatsonis CA
Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):243-56. PubMed ID: 17340598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The comparison of clinical imaging devices with respect to parallel readings in both devices.
Krummenauer F
Eur J Med Res; 2006 Mar; 11(3):119-22. PubMed ID: 16751112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A marginal model approach for analysis of multi-reader multi-test receiver operating characteristic (ROC) data.
Song X; Zhou XH
Biostatistics; 2005 Apr; 6(2):303-12. PubMed ID: 15772108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A permutation test for comparing ROC curves in multireader studies a multi-reader ROC, permutation test.
Bandos AI; Rockette HE; Gur D
Acad Radiol; 2006 Apr; 13(4):414-20. PubMed ID: 16554220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliability studies of diagnostic tests are not using enough observers for robust estimation of interobserver agreement: a simulation study.
Sadatsafavi M; Najafzadeh M; Lynd L; Marra C
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Jul; 61(7):722-7. PubMed ID: 18486446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz and Obuchowski-Rockette methods for receiver operating characteristic (ROC) data.
Hillis SL; Obuchowski NA; Schartz KM; Berbaum KS
Stat Med; 2005 May; 24(10):1579-607. PubMed ID: 15685718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reader variability in mammography and its implications for expected utility over the population of readers and cases.
Wagner RF; Beam CA; Beiden SV
Med Decis Making; 2004; 24(6):561-72. PubMed ID: 15534338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reader studies for validation of CAD systems.
Gallas BD; Brown DG
Neural Netw; 2008; 21(2-3):387-97. PubMed ID: 18215501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. One-shot estimate of MRMC variance: AUC.
Gallas BD
Acad Radiol; 2006 Mar; 13(3):353-62. PubMed ID: 16488848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Components-of-variance models for random-effects ROC analysis: the case of unequal variance structures across modalities.
Beiden SV; Wagner RF; Campbell G; Metz CE; Jiang Y
Acad Radiol; 2001 Jul; 8(7):605-15. PubMed ID: 11450961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. On the exact interval estimation for the difference in paired areas under the ROC curves.
Li CR; Liao CT; Liu JP
Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):224-42. PubMed ID: 17139702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Wilcoxon-based group sequential designs for comparison of areas under two correlated ROC curves.
Zhou XH; Li SM; Gatsonis CA
Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):213-23. PubMed ID: 17357988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Combining dependent tests to compare the diagnostic accuracies--a non-parametric approach.
Yang Y; Jin Z
Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1239-50. PubMed ID: 16158406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tests of equivalence and non-inferiority for diagnostic accuracy based on the paired areas under ROC curves.
Liu JP; Ma MC; Wu CY; Tai JY
Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1219-38. PubMed ID: 16158400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Statistical test to assess rank-order imaging studies.
Rockette HE; Li W; Brown ML; Britton CA; Towers JT; Gur D
Acad Radiol; 2001 Jan; 8(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 11201453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of two scores in the diagnosis of stroke subtype in a multicenter cohort study.
Nouira S; Boukef R; Bouida W; Marghli S; Dridi Z; Benamou S; Frih M; Gamra H
Ann Emerg Med; 2009 Mar; 53(3):373-8. PubMed ID: 18708271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the longitudinal tumor extent of bile duct cancer: value of adding gadolinium-enhanced dynamic imaging to unenhanced images and magnetic resonance cholangiography.
Kim HJ; Lee JM; Kim SH; Han JK; Lee JY; Choi JY; Kim KH; Kim JY; Lee MW; Kim SJ; Choi BI
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(3):469-74. PubMed ID: 17538298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
