These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
579 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11700793)
1. Bacterial adhesion to surface hydrophilic and hydrophobic contact lenses. Bruinsma GM; van der Mei HC; Busscher HJ Biomaterials; 2001 Dec; 22(24):3217-24. PubMed ID: 11700793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of wear and overwear on surface properties of etafilcon A contact lenses and adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Bruinsma GM; Rustema-Abbing M; de Vries J; Stegenga B; van der Mei HC; van der Linden ML; Hooymans JM; Busscher HJ Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Dec; 43(12):3646-53. PubMed ID: 12454031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of surface roughness and bacterial adhesion between cosmetic contact lenses and conventional contact lenses. Ji YW; Cho YJ; Lee CH; Hong SH; Chung DY; Kim EK; Lee HK Eye Contact Lens; 2015 Jan; 41(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 25536530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bacterial interactions with contact lenses; effects of lens material, lens wear and microbial physiology. Willcox MD; Harmis N; Cowell ; Williams T; Holden Biomaterials; 2001 Dec; 22(24):3235-47. PubMed ID: 11700795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contact lens hydrophobicity and roughness effects on bacterial adhesion. Giraldez MJ; Resua CG; Lira M; Oliveira ME; MagariƱos B; Toranzo AE; Yebra-Pimentel E Optom Vis Sci; 2010 Jun; 87(6):E426-31. PubMed ID: 20375748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of day and night wear on surface properties of silicone hydrogel contact lenses and bacterial adhesion. Vermeltfoort PB; Rustema-Abbing M; de Vries J; Bruinsma GM; Busscher HJ; van der Linden ML; Hooymans JM; van der Mei HC Cornea; 2006 Jun; 25(5):516-23. PubMed ID: 16783138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multiple surface properties of worn RGP lenses and adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Bruinsma GM; Rustema-Abbing M; de Vries J; Busscher HJ; van der Linden ML; Hooymans JM; van der Mei HC Biomaterials; 2003 Apr; 24(9):1663-70. PubMed ID: 12559826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficacy of ophthalmic solutions to detach adhering Pseudomonas aeruginosa from contact lenses. Landa AS; van der Mei HC; van Rij G; Busscher HJ Cornea; 1998 May; 17(3):293-300. PubMed ID: 9603386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bacterial adhesion to worn silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Santos L; Rodrigues D; Lira M; Real Oliveira ME; Oliveira R; Vilar EY; Azeredo J Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Jul; 85(7):520-5. PubMed ID: 18594343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Modulation of bacterial adhesion to hydrogel contact lenses by albumin. Taylor RL; Willcox MD; Williams TJ; Verran J Optom Vis Sci; 1998 Jan; 75(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 9460783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vitro deposition of lysozyme on etafilcon A and balafilcon A hydrogel contact lenses: effects on adhesion and survival of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. Zhang S; Borazjani RN; Salamone JC; Ahearn DG; Crow SA; Pierce GE Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2005 Sep; 28(3):113-9. PubMed ID: 16318841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contact lens surface deposits increase the adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Butrus SI; Klotz SA Curr Eye Res; 1990 Aug; 9(8):717-24. PubMed ID: 1980452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of the use of an ATP-based bioluminescent assay and image analysis for the assessment of bacterial adhesion to standard HEMA and biomimetic soft contact lenses. Andrews CS; Denyer SP; Hall B; Hanlon GW; Lloyd AW Biomaterials; 2001 Dec; 22(24):3225-33. PubMed ID: 11700794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The role of type III secretion system and lens material on adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to contact lenses. Shen EP; Tsay RY; Chia JS; Wu S; Lee JW; Hu FR Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Sep; 53(10):6416-26. PubMed ID: 22918630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The contribution of bacterial surface hydrophobicity to the process of adherence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to hydrophilic contact lenses. Klotz SA; Butrus SI; Misra RP; Osato MS Curr Eye Res; 1989 Feb; 8(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 2496954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus epidermidis to silicone-hydrogel contact lenses. Henriques M; Sousa C; Lira M; Elisabete M; Oliveira R; Oliveira R; Azeredo J Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Jun; 82(6):446-50. PubMed ID: 15976580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adhesive capabilities of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from tears of HIV/AIDS patients to soft contact lenses. Ajayi BO; Kio FE; Otajevwo FD Glob J Health Sci; 2012 Jan; 4(1):140-8. PubMed ID: 22980120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Glycoprotein 340's Scavenger Receptor Cysteine-Rich Domain Promotes Adhesion of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa to Contact Lens Polymers. Osei KA; Mieher JL; Patel M; Nichols JJ; Deivanayagam C Infect Immun; 2022 Jan; 90(1):e0033921. PubMed ID: 34662210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of surface treatment on hydrophobicity, protein adsorption and microbial colonisation of silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Santos L; Rodrigues D; Lira M; Oliveira ME; Oliveira R; Vilar EY; Azeredo J Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2007 Jul; 30(3):183-8. PubMed ID: 17291818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]