These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11700894)

  • 1. The variance theory of the mirror effect in recognition memory.
    Sikström S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2001 Sep; 8(3):408-38. PubMed ID: 11700894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The variance reaction time model.
    Sikström S
    Cogn Psychol; 2004 Jun; 48(4):371-421. PubMed ID: 15099797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Word frequency and receiver operating characteristic curves in recognition memory: evidence for a dual-process interpretation.
    Arndt J; Reder LM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Sep; 28(5):830-42. PubMed ID: 12219793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Investigating strength and frequency effects in recognition memory using type-2 signal detection theory.
    Higham PA; Perfect TJ; Bruno D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):57-80. PubMed ID: 19210081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Age and response bias: evidence from the strength-based mirror effect.
    Criss AH; Aue W; Kılıç A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 Oct; 67(10):1910-24. PubMed ID: 24386987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Models that allow us to perceive the world more accurately also allow us to remember past events more accurately via differentiation.
    Kılıç A; Criss AH; Malmberg KJ; Shiffrin RM
    Cogn Psychol; 2017 Feb; 92():65-86. PubMed ID: 27907808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the nature of the decision axis in signal-detection-based models of recognition memory.
    Morrell HE; Gaitan S; Wixted JT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Nov; 28(6):1095-110. PubMed ID: 12450335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the difference between strength-based and frequency-based mirror effects in recognition memory.
    Stretch V; Wixted JT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1998 Nov; 24(6):1379-96. PubMed ID: 9835059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The mirror effect and mixture signal detection theory.
    DeCarlo LT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Jan; 33(1):18-33. PubMed ID: 17201552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of recollection and familiarity in the context variability mirror effect.
    Cook GI; Marsh RL; Hicks JL
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Mar; 34(2):240-50. PubMed ID: 16752588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Feature frequency effects in recognition memory.
    Malmberg KJ; Steyvers M; Stephens JD; Shiffrin RM
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Jun; 30(4):607-13. PubMed ID: 12184562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Strength-based mirror effects in item and associative recognition: evidence for within-list criterion changes.
    Hockley WE; Niewiadomski MW
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Jun; 35(4):679-88. PubMed ID: 17848026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The shape of things to come: evaluating word frequency as a continuous variable in recognition memory.
    Hemmer P; Criss AH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Nov; 39(6):1947-52. PubMed ID: 23855550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A strict response criterion yields a mirror effect in the novelty paradigm.
    Aberg CS; Nilsson LG
    Scand J Psychol; 2003 Dec; 44(5):425-32. PubMed ID: 15030108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lexico-semantic structure and the word-frequency effect in recognition memory.
    Monaco JD; Abbott LF; Kahana MJ
    Learn Mem; 2007 Mar; 14(3):204-13. PubMed ID: 17351146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Context-dependent recognition memory: the ICE theory.
    Murnane K; Phelps MP; Malmberg K
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1999 Dec; 128(4):403-15. PubMed ID: 10650581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recognition memory for 2,578 monosyllabic words.
    Cortese MJ; Khanna MM; Hacker S
    Memory; 2010 Aug; 18(6):595-609. PubMed ID: 20677075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Likelihood ratio sequential sampling models of recognition memory.
    Osth AF; Dennis S; Heathcote A
    Cogn Psychol; 2017 Feb; 92():101-126. PubMed ID: 27918908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the nature of associative information in recognition memory.
    Kelley R; Wixted JT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 May; 27(3):701-22. PubMed ID: 11394675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. fMRI evidence of word frequency and strength effects during episodic memory encoding.
    de Zubicaray GI; McMahon KL; Eastburn MM; Finnigan S; Humphreys MS
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Mar; 22(3):439-50. PubMed ID: 15722213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.