313 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11701788)
1. In vivo deterioration of tibial baseplate locking mechanisms in contemporary modular total knee components.
Engh GA; Lounici S; Rao AR; Collier MB
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2001 Nov; 83(11):1660-5. PubMed ID: 11701788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tibial interface wear in retrieved total knee components and correlations with modular insert motion.
Rao AR; Engh GA; Collier MB; Lounici S
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 Oct; 84(10):1849-55. PubMed ID: 12377918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does increased topside conformity in modular total knee arthroplasty lead to increased backside wear?
Schwarzkopf R; Scott RD; Carlson EM; Currier JH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Jan; 473(1):220-5. PubMed ID: 24777725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Current Total Knee Designs: Does Baseplate Roughness or Locking Mechanism Design Affect Polyethylene Backside Wear?
Sisko ZW; Teeter MG; Lanting BA; Howard JL; McCalden RW; Naudie DD; MacDonald SJ; Vasarhelyi EM
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Dec; 475(12):2970-2980. PubMed ID: 28905208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tibial insert undersurface as a contributing source of polyethylene wear debris.
Wasielewski RC; Parks N; Williams I; Surprenant H; Collier JP; Engh G
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1997 Dec; (345):53-9. PubMed ID: 9418621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Backside wear of modular ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene tibial inserts.
Conditt MA; Ismaily SK; Alexander JW; Noble PC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 May; 86(5):1031-7. PubMed ID: 15118049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Backside damage corresponding to articular damage in retrieved tibial polyethylene inserts.
Harman MK; Banks SA; Hodge WA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 May; 458():137-44. PubMed ID: 17242615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Changes in surface topography at the TKA backside articulation following in vivo service: a retrieval analysis.
Holleyman RJ; Scholes SC; Weir D; Jameson SS; Holland J; Joyce TJ; Deehan DJ
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2015 Dec; 23(12):3523-31. PubMed ID: 25100486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Coventry Award. Modular tibial insert micromotion. A concern with contemporary knee implants.
Parks NL; Engh GA; Topoleski LD; Emperado J
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Nov; (356):10-5. PubMed ID: 9917661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Osteolysis after total knee arthroplasty: influence of tibial baseplate surface finish and sterilization of polyethylene insert. Findings at five to ten years postoperatively.
Collier MB; Engh CA; Mcauley JP; Ginn SD; Engh GA
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2005 Dec; 87(12):2702-2708. PubMed ID: 16322620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Failure of tibial polyethylene insert locking mechanism in posterior stabilized arthroplasty.
Thienpont E
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2013 Dec; 21(12):2685-8. PubMed ID: 22547247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Monoblock versus modular polyethylene insert in uncemented total knee arthroplasty.
Andersen MR; Winther N; Lind T; SchrøDer H; Flivik G; Petersen MM
Acta Orthop; 2016 Dec; 87(6):607-614. PubMed ID: 27649258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical results of modular polyethylene insert exchange with retention of total knee arthroplasty components.
Engh GA; Koralewicz LM; Pereles TR
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Apr; 82(4):516-23. PubMed ID: 10761942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The causes of insert backside wear in total knee arthroplasty.
Wasielewski RC
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2002 Nov; (404):232-46. PubMed ID: 12439265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors affecting the severity of backside wear of modular tibial inserts.
Conditt MA; Stein JA; Noble PC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Feb; 86(2):305-11. PubMed ID: 14960675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Crosslink Density Is Reduced and Oxidation Is Increased in Retrieved Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene TKA Tibial Inserts.
Liu T; Esposito CI; Burket JC; Wright TM
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Jan; 475(1):128-136. PubMed ID: 27084716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effectiveness of isolated tibial insert exchange in revision total knee arthroplasty.
Babis GC; Trousdale RT; Morrey BF
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 Jan; 84(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 11792781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The incidence of revision of the metal component of total knee arthroplasties in different tibial-insert designs.
Huang CH; Liau JJ; Lung CY; Lan CT; Cheng CK
Knee; 2002 Dec; 9(4):331-4. PubMed ID: 12424043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of backside wear from the analysis of 55 retrieved tibial inserts.
Li S; Scuderi G; Furman BD; Bhattacharyya S; Schmieg JJ; Insall JN
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2002 Nov; (404):75-82. PubMed ID: 12439241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tibial tray debonding from the cement mantle is associated with deformation of the backside of polyethylene tibial inserts.
Bhalekar RM; Nargol ME; Shyam N; Nargol AVF; Wells SR; Collier R; Pabbruwe M; Joyce TJ; Langton DJ
Bone Joint J; 2021 Dec; 103-B(12):1791-1801. PubMed ID: 34474593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
