BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

554 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11701794)

  • 1. Retention of all-polyethylene acetabular components after femoral revision of a cemented total hip replacement.
    Hamlin BR; Rowland C; Morrey BF
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2001 Nov; 83(11):1700-5. PubMed ID: 11701794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The fate of stable cemented acetabular components retained during revision of a femoral component of a total hip arthroplasty.
    Berger RA; Quigley LR; Jacobs JJ; Sheinkop MB; Rosenberg AG; Galante JO
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Dec; 81(12):1682-91. PubMed ID: 10608379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fate of cementless acetabular components retained during revision total hip arthroplasty.
    Beaulé PE; Le Duff MJ; Dorey FJ; Amstutz HC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Dec; 85(12):2288-93. PubMed ID: 14668496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acetabular reconstruction with impaction bone-grafting and a cemented cup in patients younger than fifty years old.
    Schreurs BW; Busch VJ; Welten ML; Verdonschot N; Slooff TJ; Gardeniers JW
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Nov; 86(11):2385-92. PubMed ID: 15523007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Oblong acetabular cup, type TC, for revision total hip arthroplasty].
    Trč T; Stastný E
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2012; 79(6):506-11. PubMed ID: 23286682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty with Retained Acetabular Component.
    Adelani MA; Mall NA; Nyazee H; Clohisy JC; Barrack RL; Nunley RM
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Jun; 96(12):1015-1020. PubMed ID: 24951737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acetabular revision after failed total hip arthroplasty in patients with congenital hip dislocation and dysplasia. Results after a mean of 8.6 years.
    Dearborn JT; Harris WH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Aug; 82(8):1146-53. PubMed ID: 10954105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fixation, survival, and dislocation of jumbo acetabular components in revision hip arthroplasty.
    Lachiewicz PF; Soileau ES
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Mar; 95(6):543-8. PubMed ID: 23515989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Total hip arthroplasty with use of the Metasul metal-on-metal articulation. Four to seven-year results.
    Dorr LD; Wan Z; Longjohn DB; Dubois B; Murken R
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Jun; 82(6):789-98. PubMed ID: 10859098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bulk structural autogenous grafts and allografts for reconstruction of the acetabulum in total hip arthroplasty. Sixteen-year-average follow-up.
    Shinar AA; Harris WH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1997 Feb; 79(2):159-68. PubMed ID: 9052535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Polyethylene liner replacement: behavior and morbidity in 68 cases].
    Bidar R; Girard J; May O; Pinoit Y; Laffargue P; Migaud H
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2007 Sep; 93(5):461-8. PubMed ID: 17878837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The fate of stable femoral components retained during isolated acetabular revision: a six-to-twelve-year follow-up study.
    Moskal JT; Shen FH; Brown TE
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 Feb; 84(2):250-5. PubMed ID: 11861731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Isolated acetabular revision with femoral stem retention after bipolar hip arthroplasty.
    Kaku N; Tabata T; Tagomori H; Tsumura H
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2017 Mar; 137(3):425-430. PubMed ID: 28150224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Revision of a cemented acetabular component to a cementless acetabular component. A ten to fourteen-year follow-up study.
    Templeton JE; Callaghan JJ; Goetz DD; Sullivan PM; Johnston RC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2001 Nov; 83(11):1706-11. PubMed ID: 11701795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cementless total hip arthroplasty with a tapered, rectangular titanium stem and a threaded cup: a minimum ten-year follow-up.
    Grübl A; Chiari C; Gruber M; Kaider A; Gottsauner-Wolf F
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 Mar; 84(3):425-31. PubMed ID: 11886913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative long-term survivorship of uncemented acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty.
    Kremers HM; Howard JL; Loechler Y; Schleck CD; Harmsen WS; Berry DJ; Cabanela ME; Hanssen AD; Pagnano MW; Trousdale RT; Lewallen DG
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Jun; 94(12):e82. PubMed ID: 22717834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A well-fixed femoral stem facing a failed acetabular component: to exchange or not? A 5- to 15-year follow-up study.
    de Thomasson E; Conso C; Mazel C
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2012 Feb; 98(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 22245150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Revision of a failed cemented total hip prosthesis with insertion of an acetabular component without cement and a femoral component with cement. A five to eight-year follow-up study.
    Weber KL; Callaghan JJ; Goetz DD; Johnston RC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1996 Jul; 78(7):982-94. PubMed ID: 8698734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. High placement of an acetabular component inserted without cement in a revision total hip arthroplasty. Results after a mean of ten years.
    Dearborn JT; Harris WH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Apr; 81(4):469-80. PubMed ID: 10225792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fate of the unrevised cemented stem following cup only revision: 227 hips at an average of 6 years follow-up.
    McGonagle L; Siney PD; Raut VV
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2015 Nov; 101(7):781-4. PubMed ID: 26498884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.