These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11704238)

  • 1. Spatial interactions minimize relative disparity between adjacent surfaces.
    Zhang Z; Edwards M; Schor CM
    Vision Res; 2001 Oct; 41(23):2995-3007. PubMed ID: 11704238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Temporal aspects of spatial interactions affecting stereo-matching solutions.
    Zhang ZL; Cantor C; Ghose T; Schor CM
    Vision Res; 2004 Dec; 44(27):3183-92. PubMed ID: 15482804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stereoscopic depth magnitude estimation: effects of stimulus spatial frequency and eccentricity.
    Cisarik PM; Harwerth RS
    Behav Brain Res; 2005 May; 160(1):88-98. PubMed ID: 15836903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stereo correspondence in one-dimensional Gabor stimuli.
    Prince SJ; Eagle RA
    Vision Res; 2000; 40(8):913-24. PubMed ID: 10720662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Disparity range for local stereopsis as a function of luminance spatial frequency.
    Schor CM; Wood I
    Vision Res; 1983; 23(12):1649-54. PubMed ID: 6666067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence for relative disparity matching in the perception of an ambiguous stereogram.
    Goutcher R; Hibbard PB
    J Vis; 2010 Oct; 10(12):35. PubMed ID: 21047767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Suprathreshold stereo-depth matches as a function of contrast and spatial frequency.
    Schor CM; Howarth PA
    Perception; 1986; 15(3):249-58. PubMed ID: 3797199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fine-to-coarse scale disambiguation in stereopsis.
    Smallman HS
    Vision Res; 1995 Apr; 35(8):1047-60. PubMed ID: 7762161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Monocular and binocular edges enhance the perception of stereoscopic slant.
    Wardle SG; Palmisano S; Gillam BJ
    Vision Res; 2014 Jul; 100():113-23. PubMed ID: 24802594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Selective biasing of stereo correspondence in an ambiguous stereogram.
    Goutcher R; Mamassian P
    Vision Res; 2005 Feb; 45(4):469-83. PubMed ID: 15610751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Properties of pupillary responses to dynamic random-dot stereograms.
    Li Z; Liang P; Sun F
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Jan; 168(3):436-40. PubMed ID: 16323005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of interocular correlation and contrast on stereoscopic depth magnitude estimation.
    Cisarik PM; Harwerth RS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Mar; 85(3):164-73. PubMed ID: 18317331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of cue context on the perception of depth from combined disparity and perspective cues.
    Harwerth RS; Moeller MC; Wensveen JM
    Optom Vis Sci; 1998 Jun; 75(6):433-44. PubMed ID: 9661212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Clinical study on crossed disparity and uncrossed disparity in intermittent exotropia before and after surgery].
    Lin N; Lu W; Wang JH
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Feb; 42(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 16643729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Unconstrained stereoscopic matching of lines.
    van Ee R; Schor CM
    Vision Res; 2000; 40(2):151-62. PubMed ID: 10793893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Human stereo matching is not restricted to epipolar lines.
    Stevenson SB; Schor CM
    Vision Res; 1997 Oct; 37(19):2717-23. PubMed ID: 9373671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stereopsis, spatial frequency and retinal eccentricity.
    Siderov J; Harwerth RS
    Vision Res; 1995 Aug; 35(16):2329-37. PubMed ID: 7571468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of Relative Disparity Sensitivity in Human Visual Cortex.
    Norcia AM; Gerhard HE; Meredith WJ
    J Neurosci; 2017 Jun; 37(23):5608-5619. PubMed ID: 28473649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gradients of relative disparity underlie the perceived slant of stereoscopic surfaces.
    Wardle SG; Gillam BJ
    J Vis; 2016; 16(5):16. PubMed ID: 26998800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stereopsis and contrast.
    Legge GE; Gu YC
    Vision Res; 1989; 29(8):989-1004. PubMed ID: 2629214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.