These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11704242)

  • 1. Stereoacuity thresholds in the presence of a reference surface.
    Andrews TJ; Glennerster A; Parker AJ
    Vision Res; 2001 Oct; 41(23):3051-61. PubMed ID: 11704242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of a local reference in stereoscopic detection of depth relief.
    Petrov Y; Glennerster A
    Vision Res; 2004 Feb; 44(4):367-76. PubMed ID: 14659963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Disparity with respect to a local reference plane as a dominant cue for stereoscopic depth relief.
    Petrov Y; Glennerster A
    Vision Res; 2006 Dec; 46(26):4321-32. PubMed ID: 17055027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Monocular and binocular depth discrimination thresholds.
    Kaye SB; Siddiqui A; Ward A; Noonan C; Fisher AC; Green JR; Brown MC; Wareing PA; Watt P
    Optom Vis Sci; 1999 Nov; 76(11):770-82. PubMed ID: 10566862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stereoacuity and colour contrast.
    Kingdom FA; Simmons DR
    Vision Res; 1996 May; 36(9):1311-9. PubMed ID: 8711909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Disparity increment thresholds for gratings.
    Farell B; Li S; McKee SP
    J Vis; 2004 Mar; 4(3):156-68. PubMed ID: 15086306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The imprecision of stereopsis.
    McKee SP; Levi DM; Bowne SF
    Vision Res; 1990; 30(11):1763-79. PubMed ID: 2288089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Systematic Comparison of Static and Dynamic Cues for Depth Perception.
    Tidbury LP; Brooks KR; O'Connor AR; Wuerger SM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2016 Jul; 57(8):3545-53. PubMed ID: 27379579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stereoscopic depth perception in peripheral field and global processing of horizontal disparity gradient pattern.
    Devisme C; Drobe B; Monot A; Droulez J
    Vision Res; 2008 Mar; 48(6):753-64. PubMed ID: 18249435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The stereoscopic sliver: a comparison of duration thresholds for fully stereoscopic and unmatched versions.
    Sachtler WL; Gillam B
    Perception; 2007; 36(1):135-44. PubMed ID: 17357711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Eye movements facilitate stereo-slant discrimination when horizontal disparity is noisy.
    Berends EM; Zhang ZL; Schor CM
    J Vis; 2003 Dec; 3(11):780-94. PubMed ID: 14765961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of cue context on the perception of depth from combined disparity and perspective cues.
    Harwerth RS; Moeller MC; Wensveen JM
    Optom Vis Sci; 1998 Jun; 75(6):433-44. PubMed ID: 9661212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The spatial requirements for fine stereoacuity.
    McKee SP
    Vision Res; 1983; 23(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 6868394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Monocular and binocular edges enhance the perception of stereoscopic slant.
    Wardle SG; Palmisano S; Gillam BJ
    Vision Res; 2014 Jul; 100():113-23. PubMed ID: 24802594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of age and optical blur on real depth stereoacuity.
    Costa MF; Moreira SM; Hamer RD; Ventura DF
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2010 Sep; 30(5):660-6. PubMed ID: 20883352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The absolute disparity anomaly and the mechanism of relative disparities.
    Chopin A; Levi D; Knill D; Bavelier D
    J Vis; 2016 Jun; 16(8):2. PubMed ID: 27248566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Shape analysis and stereopsis for human depth perception.
    Kumar T; Glaser DA
    Vision Res; 1992 Mar; 32(3):499-512. PubMed ID: 1604837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Variation in stereoacuity: normative description, fixation disparity, and the roles of aging and gender.
    Zaroff CM; Knutelska M; Frumkes TE
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2003 Feb; 44(2):891-900. PubMed ID: 12556426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The perceived visual direction of monocular objects in random-dot stereograms is influenced by perceived depth and allelotropia.
    Hariharan-Vilupuru S; Bedell HE
    Vision Res; 2009 Jan; 49(2):190-201. PubMed ID: 18992271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the accuracy of surface reconstruction from disparity interpolation.
    Yang Y; Blake R
    Vision Res; 1995 Apr; 35(7):949-60. PubMed ID: 7762152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.