202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11704338)
1. Comparision of four different dose specification methods for high-dose-rate intracavitary radiation for treatment of cervical cancer.
Mai J; Erickson B; Rownd J; Gillin M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Nov; 51(4):1131-41. PubMed ID: 11704338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of traditional low-dose-rate to optimized and nonoptimized high-dose-rate tandem and ovoid dosimetry.
Decker WE; Erickson B; Albano K; Gillin M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Jun; 50(2):561-7. PubMed ID: 11380246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of "optimized" treatment planning for tandem and ring, and tandem and ovoids, using high dose rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer.
Noyes WR; Peters NE; Thomadsen BR; Fowler JF; Buchler DA; Stitt JA; Kinsella TJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Jan; 31(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 7995771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison between tandem and ovoids and interstitial gynecologic template brachytherapy dosimetry using a hypothetical computer model.
Hsu IC; Speight J; Hai J; Vigneault E; Phillips T; Pouliot J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Feb; 52(2):538-43. PubMed ID: 11872302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ring Versus Ovoids and Intracavitary Versus Intracavitary-Interstitial Applicators in Cervical Cancer Brachytherapy: Results From the EMBRACE I Study.
Serban M; Kirisits C; de Leeuw A; Pötter R; Jürgenliemk-Schulz I; Nesvacil N; Swamidas J; Hudej R; Lowe G; Hellebust TP; Menon G; Oinam A; Bownes P; Oosterveld B; De Brabandere M; Koedooder K; Langeland Marthinsen AB; Whitney D; Lindegaard J; Tanderup K;
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2020 Apr; 106(5):1052-1062. PubMed ID: 32007365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of brachytherapy applicators geometry on dose distribution in cervical cancer.
Senkus-Konefka E; Kobierska A; Jassem J; Serkies K; Badzio A
Strahlenther Onkol; 1997 Jun; 173(6):323-9. PubMed ID: 9209530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantification of intracavitary brachytherapy parameters and correlation with outcome in patients with carcinoma of the cervix.
Katz A; Eifel PJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Dec; 48(5):1417-25. PubMed ID: 11121642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dosimetric comparison of ring and ovoid applicators.
Tuncell N; Toy A; Demiral AN; Cetingoz R; Garipagaoglu M
J BUON; 2009; 14(3):451-5. PubMed ID: 19810138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Patient-related factors determining geometry of intracavitary applicators and pelvic dose distribution during cervical cancer brachytherapy.
Senkus-Konefka E; Kobierska A; Jassem J; Badzio A
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Feb; 37(3):531-6. PubMed ID: 9112449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dosimetric comparison of tandem and Ovoids vs. tandem and ring for intracavitary gynecologic applications.
Levin D; Menhel J; Rabin T; Pfeffer MR; Symon Z
Med Dosim; 2008; 33(4):315-20. PubMed ID: 18973861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Patterns of brachytherapy practice for patients with carcinoma of the cervix (1996-1999): a patterns of care study.
Erickson B; Eifel P; Moughan J; Rownd J; Iarocci T; Owen J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Nov; 63(4):1083-92. PubMed ID: 16099599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dosimetric evaluation of image based brachytherapy using tandem ovoid and tandem ring applicators.
Rangarajan R
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother; 2018; 23(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 29348735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of the rectal retractor to reduce the rectal dose in high dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy for a carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
Lee KC; Kim TH; Choi JH; Choi MS; Kim CY; Kim JY
Yonsei Med J; 2004 Feb; 45(1):113-22. PubMed ID: 15004877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. CT based 3-dimensional treatment planning of intracavitary brachytherapy for cancer of the cervix: comparison between dose-volume histograms and ICRU point doses to the rectum and bladder.
Hashim N; Jamalludin Z; Ung NM; Ho GF; Malik RA; Phua VC
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(13):5259-64. PubMed ID: 25040985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison between CT-based volumetric calculations and ICRU reference-point estimates of radiation doses delivered to bladder and rectum during intracavitary radiotherapy for cervical cancer.
Pelloski CE; Palmer M; Chronowski GM; Jhingran A; Horton J; Eifel PJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 May; 62(1):131-7. PubMed ID: 15850913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimization in high dose rate brachytherapy for utero-vaginal applications.
Cetingöz R; Ataman OU; Tuncel N; Sen M; Kinay M
Radiother Oncol; 2001 Jan; 58(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 11165679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dosimetric comparison of bladder, rectal, and vaginal surface doses between ovoids and cylinder-based vaginal brachytherapy in carcinoma of the endometrium.
Kumar NP; Kumar A; Jayaprakash PG; Raghukumar P; James FV
J Cancer Res Ther; 2018; 14(6):1191-1195. PubMed ID: 30488828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Retrospective dosimetric comparison of low-dose-rate and pulsed-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy using a tandem and mini-ovoids.
Mourtada F; Gifford KA; Berner PA; Horton JL; Price MJ; Lawyer AA; Eifel PJ
Med Dosim; 2007; 32(3):181-7. PubMed ID: 17707197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of 2D vs. 3D dosimetry for Rotte 'Y' applicator high dose rate brachytherapy for medically inoperable endometrial cancer.
Beriwal S; Kim H; Heron DE; Selvaraj R
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Oct; 5(5):521-7. PubMed ID: 16981795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Vaginal Dose Is Associated With Toxicity in Image Guided Tandem Ring or Ovoid-Based Brachytherapy.
Susko M; Craciunescu O; Meltsner S; Yang Y; Steffey B; Cai J; Chino J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 Apr; 94(5):1099-105. PubMed ID: 26883564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
