These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11704916)

  • 1. [First clinical experience with a full-size, flat-panel detector for imaging the peripheral skeletal system].
    Reissberg S; Hoeschen C; Kästner A; Theus U; Fiedler R; Krause U; Döhring W
    Rofo; 2001 Nov; 173(11):1048-52. PubMed ID: 11704916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [First clinical experience with a full-size, flat-panel detector for imaging the peripheral skeleton - Part II: Post-processing with a newly developed adaptive autowindow algorithm].
    Reissberg S; Hoeschen C; Kästner A; Theus U; Fiedler R; Krause U; Döhring W
    Rofo; 2002 Mar; 174(3):353-6. PubMed ID: 11885015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Variation in X-ray dose quantity using an amorphous selenium based flat-panel detector -- a study on the dose reduction rate up to the limit of diagnostical utilization].
    Lehnert T; Wohlers J; Streng W; Manegold K; Wetter A; Jacobi V; Mack MG; Vogl TJ
    Rofo; 2006 Mar; 178(3):278-86. PubMed ID: 16508834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Simulated bone erosions in a hand phantom: detection with conventional screen-film technology versus cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector.
    Strotzer M; Völk M; Wild T; von Landenberg P; Feuerbach S
    Radiology; 2000 May; 215(2):512-5. PubMed ID: 10796933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Imaging performance with different doses in skeletal radiography: comparison of a needle-structured and a conventional storage phosphor system with a flat-panel detector.
    Wirth S; Treitl M; Reiser MF; Körner M
    Radiology; 2009 Jan; 250(1):152-60. PubMed ID: 19001150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical application of a flat-panel X-ray detector based on amorphous silicon technology: image quality and potential for radiation dose reduction in skeletal radiography.
    Strotzer M; Gmeinwieser J; Völk M; Fründ R; Seitz J; Manke C; Albrich H; Feuerbach S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jul; 171(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 9648757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dual-energy cardiac imaging: an image quality and dose comparison for a flat-panel detector and x-ray image intensifier.
    Ducote JL; Xu T; Molloi S
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):183-96. PubMed ID: 17183135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radiation dose and image quality in diagnostic radiology. Optimization of the dose-image quality relationship with clinical experience from scoliosis radiography, coronary intervention and a flat-panel digital detector.
    Geijer H
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 2002 Mar; 43(427):1-43. PubMed ID: 12108231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Routine skeleton radiography using a flat-panel detector: image quality and clinical acceptance at 50% dose reduction.
    Völk M; Paetzel C; Angele P; Seitz JS; Füchtmeier B; Hente R; Feuerbach S; Strotzer M
    Invest Radiol; 2003 Apr; 38(4):230-5. PubMed ID: 12649647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography at different exposure doses versus mammography film: possibility of radiation dose reduction in detecting rheumatologic bone defects.
    Zähringer M; Reineck S; Perniok A; Krüger K; Andermahr J; Rubbert A; Winnekendonk G
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Mar; 49(2):157-66. PubMed ID: 18300139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Comparison of four digital and one conventional radiographic image systems for the chest in a patient study with subsequent system optimization].
    Redlich U; Hoeschen C; Effenberger O; Fessel A; Preuss H; Reissberg S; Scherlach C; Döhring W
    Rofo; 2005 Feb; 177(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 15666237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Digital flat image detector technique based on cesium iodide and amorphous silicon: experimental studies and initial clinical results].
    Strotzer M; Gmeinwieser J; Völk M; Fründ R; Feuerbach S
    Rofo; 1999 Jan; 170(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 10071647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging.
    Samei E; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Tornai MP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):220-9. PubMed ID: 15933112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digital radiography of the skeleton using a large-area detector based on amorphous silicon technology: image quality and potential for dose reduction in comparison with screen-film radiography.
    Völk M; Strotzer M; Holzknecht N; Manke C; Lenhart M; Gmeinwieser J; Link J; Reiser M; Feuerbach S
    Clin Radiol; 2000 Aug; 55(8):615-21. PubMed ID: 10964733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Digital radiography with a large-scale electronic flat-panel detector vs. screen-film radiography: observer preference in clinical skeletal diagnostics.
    Hamers S; Freyschmidt J; Neitzel U
    Eur Radiol; 2001; 11(9):1753-9. PubMed ID: 11511898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Flat-screen detector systems in skeletal radiology].
    Grampp S; Czerny C; Krestan C; Henk C; Heiner L; Imhof H
    Radiologe; 2003 May; 43(5):362-6. PubMed ID: 12764584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Radiation exposure in full-field digital mammography with a flat-panel x-ray detector based on amorphous silicon in comparison with conventional screen-film mammography].
    Hermann KP; Obenauer S; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 2000 Nov; 172(11):940-5. PubMed ID: 11142129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Image quality and radiation dose on digital chest imaging: comparison of amorphous silicon and amorphous selenium flat-panel systems.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; Vereecken L; De Hauwere A; Duyck P; De Man R; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Sep; 187(3):630-7. PubMed ID: 16928923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical comparative study with a large-area amorphous silicon flat-panel detector: image quality and visibility of anatomic structures on chest radiography.
    Fink C; Hallscheidt PJ; Noeldge G; Kampschulte A; Radeleff B; Hosch WP; Kauffmann GW; Hansmann J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Feb; 178(2):481-6. PubMed ID: 11804922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.