2205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11706722)
41. Results of the Evora dual-mobility socket after a minimum follow-up of five years.
Leclercq S; Benoit JY; de Rosa JP; Euvrard P; Leteurtre C; Girardin P
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Dec; 94(8):e17-22. PubMed ID: 19070709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Medium to long-term results with the cementless threaded Acetabular Munich II type cup.
Pellengahr C; Wegener B; Anetzberger H; Maier M; Müller PE; Dürr HR; Schulz C; Troullier H; Kühne L; Refior HJ
Acta Chir Belg; 2004 Aug; 104(4):413-7. PubMed ID: 15469152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Long-term clinical outcome of acetabular cup revision surgery: comparison of cemented cups, cementless cups, and cemented cups with reinforcement devices.
Kokubo Y; Oki H; Sugita D; Negoro K; Takeno K; Miyazaki T; Nakajima H
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2016 May; 26(4):407-13. PubMed ID: 27010392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Acetabular revision arthroplasty using jumbo cups: an experience in Asia.
Fan CY; Chen WM; Lee OK; Huang CK; Chiang CC; Chen TH
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Aug; 128(8):809-13. PubMed ID: 17985149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Jumbo cups for revision of acetabular defects after total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective review of a case series.
Wedemeyer C; Neuerburg C; Heep H; von Knoch F; von Knoch M; Löer F; Saxler G
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Jun; 128(6):545-50. PubMed ID: 18000673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. [The Zweymuller endoprosthesis in hip joint revision surgery].
Stĕdrý V; Dungl P; Hajný P; Biegel M; Podskubka A
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(4):230-8. PubMed ID: 11706547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. [Ten-year experience with the Aldinger custom-made total hip arthroplasty: evaluation of the results].
Masár J
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Jun; 74(3):175-81. PubMed ID: 17623605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. [Revision arthroplasty of the hip joint with autologous and homologous cancellous bone].
Morscher E; Dick W; Seelig W
Orthopade; 1989 Sep; 18(5):428-37. PubMed ID: 2812775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Uncemented total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in young patients: a mid-to long-term follow-up study from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.
Eskelinen A; Remes V; Helenius I; Pulkkinen P; Nevalainen J; Paavolainen P
Acta Orthop; 2006 Feb; 77(1):57-70. PubMed ID: 16534703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Revision total hip arthroplasty with titanium ingrowth prosthesis and bone grafting for failed cemented femoral component loosening.
Gustilo RB; Pasternak HS
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1988 Oct; (235):111-9. PubMed ID: 3416518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. [Etiology, diagnosis and therapy of aseptic hip prosthesis loosening--a status assessment].
Wirtz DC; Niethard FU
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1997; 135(4):270-80. PubMed ID: 9381761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. [Treatment of aseptic acetabular loosening by reconstruction combining bone graft and Müller ring. Actuarial analysis over 11 years].
Massin P; Tanaka C; Huten D; Duparc J
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1998 Feb; 84(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 9775022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Pitfalls in the use of acetabular reinforcement rings in total hip revision.
Bader R; Mittelmeier W; Zeiler G; Tokar I; Steinhauser E; Schuh A
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2005 Oct; 125(8):558-63. PubMed ID: 16189686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. [Long-term results of primary hip total prosthesis with acetabulum reinforcement ring].
Aebi M; Richner L; Ganz R
Orthopade; 1989 Nov; 18(6):504-10. PubMed ID: 2608270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. [Bousquet's device in the treatment of recurrent dislocation of a total hip prosthesis. Apropos of 13 cases].
Leclercq S; el Blidi S; Aubriot JH
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1995; 81(5):389-94. PubMed ID: 8560007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Morselized homologous grafts in revision arthroplasty of the acetabulum.
Herzog R; Morscher E
Chir Organi Mov; 1994; 79(4):371-8. PubMed ID: 7614878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. [Total hip replacement in osteoarthritis with acetabular protrusion].
Rozkydal Z; Kunovský R
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2003; 70(5):296-302. PubMed ID: 14669592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Revision total hip arthroplasty using a cementless acetabular component: technique and results.
Silverton CD; Rosenberg AG; Sheinkop MB; Kull LR; Galante JO
Semin Arthroplasty; 1995 Apr; 6(2):109-17. PubMed ID: 10155687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Satisfying Results of Primary Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Hip Dysplasia at a Mean Followup of 20 Years.
Colo E; Rijnen WH; Gardeniers JW; van Kampen A; Schreurs BW
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Nov; 474(11):2462-2468. PubMed ID: 27492686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Cementing a Monoblock Dual-Mobility Implant into a Fully Porous Cup in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty to Address Hip Instability: Surgical Technique.
Shichman I; Habibi AA; Robin JX; Gemayel AC; Lowe DT; Schwarzkopf R
JBJS Essent Surg Tech; 2023; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 38357466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
