These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11707705)

  • 1. The response of human volunteers to rear-end impacts: the effect of head restraint properties.
    Tencer AF; Mirza S; Bensel K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Nov; 26(22):2432-40; discussion 2441-2. PubMed ID: 11707705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Internal loads in the cervical spine during motor vehicle rear-end impacts: the effect of acceleration and head-to-head restraint proximity.
    Tencer AF; Mirza S; Bensel K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Jan; 27(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 11805633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Seat back and head restraint response during low-speed rear-end automobile collisions.
    Lawrence JM; Siegmund GP
    Accid Anal Prev; 2000 Mar; 32(2):219-32. PubMed ID: 10688478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of injury criteria used in evaluating seats for whiplash protection.
    Tencer AF; Mirza S; Huber P
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2004 Mar; 5(1):56-66. PubMed ID: 14754676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of seat foam and geometrical properties on BioRID P3 kinematic response to rear impacts.
    Szabo TJ; Voss DP; Welcher JB
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2003 Dec; 4(4):315-23. PubMed ID: 14630580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relationships between seat properties and human subject kinematics in rear impact tests.
    Welcher JB; Szabo TJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2001 May; 33(3):289-304. PubMed ID: 11235791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Occupant responses in conventional and ABTS seats in high-speed rear sled tests.
    Viano DC; Parenteau CS; Burnett R; Prasad P
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Jan; 19(1):54-59. PubMed ID: 28678610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Real-world adjustments of driver seat and head restraint in Saab 9-3 vehicles.
    Carlsson A; Pipkorn L; Kullgren A; Svensson M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 May; 18(4):398-405. PubMed ID: 27617749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Average male and female virtual dummy model (BioRID and EvaRID) simulations with two seat concepts in the Euro NCAP low severity rear impact test configuration.
    Linder A; Holmqvist K; Svensson MY
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 May; 114():62-70. PubMed ID: 28622848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Seat properties affecting neck responses in rear crashes: a reason why whiplash has increased.
    Viano DC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2003 Sep; 4(3):214-27. PubMed ID: 14522646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of a 3-point harness restraint and car seat in whiplash-type lateral impacts.
    Kumar S; Ferrari R; Narayan Y; Jones T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Jan; 31(1):E11-8. PubMed ID: 16395161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Injuries in Full-Scale Vehicle Side Impact Moving Deformable Barrier and Pole Tests Using Postmortem Human Subjects.
    Yoganandan N; Pintar F; Humm J; Rudd R
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S224-30. PubMed ID: 26436236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of seat-back and head-restraint properties on the head-neck motion during rear-impact.
    Svensson MY; Lövsund P; Håland Y; Larsson S
    Accid Anal Prev; 1996 Mar; 28(2):221-7. PubMed ID: 8703280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effectiveness of active head restraint in preventing whiplash.
    Viano DC; Olsen S
    J Trauma; 2001 Nov; 51(5):959-69. PubMed ID: 11706347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of head restraint and occupant factors on peak head/neck kinematics in low-speed rear-end collisions.
    Siegmund GP; Heinrichs BE; Wheeler JB
    Accid Anal Prev; 1999 Jul; 31(4):393-407. PubMed ID: 10384232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dynamic performances of different seat designs for low to medium velocity rear impact.
    Linder A; Olsson T; Truedsson N; Morris A; Fildes B; Sparke L
    Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med; 2001; 45():187-201. PubMed ID: 12214349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of seat characteristics on occupant motion in low-speed rear impacts.
    Watanabe Y; Ichikawa H; Kayama O; Ono K; Kaneoka K; Inami S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2000 Mar; 32(2):243-50. PubMed ID: 10688480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differences in the kinematics of booster-seated pediatric occupants using two different car seats.
    Juste-Lorente O; Maza M; Lorente AI; Lopez-Valdes FJ
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Jan; 19(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 28594247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Influence of Enhanced Side Impact Protection on Kinematics and Injury Measures of Far- or Center-Seated Children in Forward-Facing Child Restraints.
    Hauschild HW; Humm JR; Pintar FA; Yoganandan N; Kaufman B; Maltese MR; Arbogast KB
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S9-S15. PubMed ID: 26436248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of child restraint lower attachment method on protection offered by forward facing child restraint systems in oblique loading conditions.
    Hauschild HW; Humm JR; Pintar FA; Yoganandan N; Kaufman B; Maltese MR; Arbogast KB
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(sup1):S139-S145. PubMed ID: 29584498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.