These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11710082)

  • 1. Transdisciplinarity and the new production of knowledge.
    van Manen M
    Qual Health Res; 2001 Nov; 11(6):850-2. PubMed ID: 11710082
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Public health preparedness in Alberta: a systems-level study.
    Moore D; Shiell A; Noseworthy T; Russell M; Predy G
    BMC Public Health; 2006 Dec; 6():313. PubMed ID: 17194305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Environmental health services in Europe 5. Guidelines for evaluation of environmental health services.
    Drew CH; van Duivenboden J; Bonnefoy X
    WHO Reg Publ Eur Ser; 2000; (90):i-viii, 1-185. PubMed ID: 11257746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Internet sites offer shortcuts to research.
    Healthc Benchmarks; 1997 May; 4(5):77-9. PubMed ID: 10168408
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. RNs explore innovative approaches to health care delivery.
    Alta RN; 2001; 57(1):18-20. PubMed ID: 11899315
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new forum for health services research in critical care medicine.
    Landry MD; Rizoli M
    J Crit Care; 2001 Dec; 16(4):136-41. PubMed ID: 11815898
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Why some evaluation studies are useful and others not: facilitators and obstacles to the use of evaluation research in hospital settings.
    Strasser S; Steinberg JS; Cummins G; Persels J
    Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1983; 28(1):69-95. PubMed ID: 10298891
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Transformative alliance between qualitative and quantitative approaches in health promotion research.
    Gendron S
    WHO Reg Publ Eur Ser; 2001; (92):107-21. PubMed ID: 11729768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Introducing qualitatively-driven mixed-method designs.
    Morse JM; Cheek J
    Qual Health Res; 2015 Jun; 25(6):731-3. PubMed ID: 25947371
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Methodologic aspects of the evaluation of the activities of cancer services (comparison of mortality indices)].
    Merabishvili VM
    Vopr Onkol; 1987; 33(8):20-6. PubMed ID: 3630028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating wellness programs.
    Higgins CW
    Health Values; 1986; 10(6):44-51. PubMed ID: 10311767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Methods of health services evaluation: the gospel of Archie Cochrane after 25 years.
    Russell I
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 1996 Apr; 1(2):114-5. PubMed ID: 10180849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Outcomes evaluation: care continuum alliance research to establish guidance on population health management in provider-driven models.
    May JC
    Popul Health Manag; 2012 Jun; 15(3):186-7. PubMed ID: 22731849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Strategic evaluation of cardiac care systems: integrating images and ideologies.
    Caro DH
    J Health Hum Resour Adm; 1989; 11(4):502-14. PubMed ID: 10303944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Meanings and interpretations.
    Ritchie JE
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2001 Dec; 25(6):574. PubMed ID: 11825000
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Scale development.
    Dinero TE
    J Health Soc Policy; 1996; 8(1):9-22. PubMed ID: 10162907
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A cross-national index of health care.
    Larson JS
    J Health Hum Resour Adm; 1986; 9(2):200-12. PubMed ID: 10281850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Health education evaluation: an alternate research paradigm.
    Gebhardt ME
    Eval Health Prof; 1980 Jun; 3(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 10247146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Qualitative vs quantitative methods: two opposites that make a perfect match.
    Abusabha R; Woelfel ML
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2003 May; 103(5):566-9. PubMed ID: 12728213
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of clinical practice guidelines.
    Basinski AS
    CMAJ; 1995 Dec; 153(11):1575-81. PubMed ID: 7489550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.