223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11710688)
1. Use of a panel of markers in the differential diagnosis of adenocarcinoma and reactive mesothelial cells in fluid cytology.
Ko EC; Jhala NC; Shultz JJ; Chhieng DC
Am J Clin Pathol; 2001 Nov; 116(5):709-15. PubMed ID: 11710688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Malignant mesothelioma: immunohistochemistry and DNA ploidy analysis as methods to differentiate mesothelioma from benign reactive mesothelial cell proliferation and adenocarcinoma in pleural and peritoneal effusions.
Friedman MT; Gentile P; Tarectecan A; Fuchs A
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Oct; 120(10):959-66. PubMed ID: 12046609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cytological differential diagnosis among adenocarcinoma, epithelial mesothelioma, and reactive mesothelial cells in serous effusions by immunocytochemistry.
Su XY; Li GD; Liu WP; Xie B; Jiang YH
Diagn Cytopathol; 2011 Dec; 39(12):900-8. PubMed ID: 20836004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [A comparative evaluation of immunohistochemical markers for the differential diagnosis between malignant mesothelioma, non-small cell carcinoma involving the pleura, and benign reactive mesothelial cell proliferation].
Szczepulska-Wójcik E; Langfort R; Roszkowski-Sliz K
Pneumonol Alergol Pol; 2007; 75(1):57-69. PubMed ID: 17541913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Immunocytochemical panel for distinguishing between adenocarcinomas and reactive mesothelial cells in effusion cell blocks.
Kim JH; Kim GE; Choi YD; Lee JS; Lee JH; Nam JH; Choi C
Diagn Cytopathol; 2009 Apr; 37(4):258-61. PubMed ID: 19217030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Significance of combining detection of E-cadherin, carcinoembryonic antigen, and calretinin in cytological differential diagnosis of serous effusion].
Su XY; Li GD; Liu HB; Jiang LL
Ai Zheng; 2004 Oct; 23(10):1185-9. PubMed ID: 15473932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Calretinin, thrombomodulin, CEA, and CD15: a useful combination of immunohistochemical markers for differentiating pleural epithelial mesothelioma from peripheral pulmonary adenocarcinoma.
Comin CE; Novelli L; Boddi V; Paglierani M; Dini S
Hum Pathol; 2001 May; 32(5):529-36. PubMed ID: 11381372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Immunocytochemical differentiation of reactive mesothelial cells and adenocarcinoma cells in serous effusions with the use of carcinoembryonic antigen and fibronectin.
Athanassiadou P; Athanassiades P; Lazaris D; Kyrkou K; Petrakakou E; Aravantinos D
Acta Cytol; 1994; 38(5):718-22. PubMed ID: 8091904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The value of calretinin and cytokeratin 5/6 as markers for mesothelioma in cell block preparations of serous effusions.
Shield PW; Koivurinne K
Cytopathology; 2008 Aug; 19(4):218-23. PubMed ID: 17916095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Immunocytochemical panel for distinguishing between carcinoma and reactive mesothelial cells in body cavity fluids.
Politi E; Kandaraki C; Apostolopoulou C; Kyritsi T; Koutselini H
Diagn Cytopathol; 2005 Mar; 32(3):151-5. PubMed ID: 15690338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The diagnostic utility of D2-40, calretinin, CK5/6, desmin and MOC-31 in the differentiation of mesothelioma from adenocarcinoma in pleural effusion cytology.
Hyun TS; Barnes M; Tabatabai ZL
Acta Cytol; 2012; 56(5):527-32. PubMed ID: 23075894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cytologic malignancy versus benignancy: how useful are the "newer" markers in body fluid cytology?
Lyons-Boudreaux V; Mody DR; Zhai J; Coffey D
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2008 Jan; 132(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 18181669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ber-EP4 for differentiating adenocarcinoma from reactive and neoplastic mesothelial cells in serous effusions. Comparison with carcinoembryonic antigen, B72.3 and Leu-M1.
Bailey ME; Brown RW; Mody DR; Cagle P; Ramzy I
Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(6):1212-6. PubMed ID: 8960030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of a monoclonal antibody (B72.3) as an immunocytochemical adjunct to diagnosis of adenocarcinoma in human effusions.
Johnston WW; Szpak CA; Lottich SC; Thor A; Schlom J
Cancer Res; 1985 Apr; 45(4):1894-900. PubMed ID: 3884146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic utility of D2-40 and podoplanin in effusion cell blocks.
Bhalla R; Siddiqui MT; Mandich D; Cartun RW; Fiel-Gan MD; Nassar A; Mandavilli SR
Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Jun; 35(6):342-7. PubMed ID: 17497664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. GATA3: a promising marker for metastatic breast carcinoma in serous effusion specimens.
Shield PW; Papadimos DJ; Walsh MD
Cancer Cytopathol; 2014 Apr; 122(4):307-12. PubMed ID: 24421220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Differentiating reactive mesothelial cells from metastatic adenocarcinoma in serous effusions: the utility of immunocytochemical panel in the differential diagnosis.
Saleh HA; El-Fakharany M; Makki H; Kadhim A; Masood S
Diagn Cytopathol; 2009 May; 37(5):324-32. PubMed ID: 19191294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. WT1, monoclonal CEA, TTF1, and CA125 antibodies in the differential diagnosis of lung, breast, and ovarian adenocarcinomas in serous effusions.
Zhu W; Michael CW
Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Jun; 35(6):370-5. PubMed ID: 17497661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic value of p53 protein in the study of serous effusions.
Zoppi JA; Pellicer EM; Sundblad AS
Acta Cytol; 1995; 39(4):721-4. PubMed ID: 7631546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Differentiation of mesothelioma from adenocarcinoma in serous effusions: the role of hyaluronic acid and CD44 localization.
Afify AM; Stern R; Michael CW
Diagn Cytopathol; 2005 Mar; 32(3):145-50. PubMed ID: 15690337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
