163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11712026)
1. Comparative study of Finn Chambers and T.R.U.E. test methodologies in detecting the relevant allergens inducing contact dermatitis.
Suneja T; Belsito DV
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2001 Dec; 45(6):836-9. PubMed ID: 11712026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prevalence and relevance of contact dermatitis allergens: a meta-analysis of 15 years of published T.R.U.E. test data.
Krob HA; Fleischer AB; D'Agostino R; Haverstock CL; Feldman S
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2004 Sep; 51(3):349-53. PubMed ID: 15337975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The detection of clinically relevant contact allergens using a standard screening tray of twenty-three allergens.
Saripalli YV; Achen F; Belsito DV
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2003 Jul; 49(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 12833010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contact allergy in children referred for patch testing: North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 2001-2004.
Zug KA; McGinley-Smith D; Warshaw EM; Taylor JS; Rietschel RL; Maibach HI; Belsito DV; Fowler JF; Storrs FJ; DeLeo VA; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Sasseville D
Arch Dermatol; 2008 Oct; 144(10):1329-36. PubMed ID: 18936397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative study of IQ-ultra and Finn Chambers test methodologies in detecting 10 common standard allergens that cause allergic contact dermatitis.
Doumit J; Pratt M
J Cutan Med Surg; 2012; 16(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 22417991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Current contact allergens].
Frosch PJ
Z Hautkr; 1987 Dec; 62(23):1631-4, 1637-8. PubMed ID: 2964130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Significance-prevalence index number: a reinterpretation and enhancement of data from the North American contact dermatitis group.
Maouad M; Fleischer AB; Sherertz EF; Feldman SR
J Am Acad Dermatol; 1999 Oct; 41(4):573-6. PubMed ID: 10495378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reproducibility of patch test results: a concurrent right-versus-left study using TRUE Test.
Ale SI; Maibach HI
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 May; 50(5):304-12. PubMed ID: 15209812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative multi-center study with TRUE Test and Finn Chamber Patch Test methods in eight Swedish hospitals.
Ruhnek-Forsbeck M; Fischer T; Meding B; Pettersson L; Stenberg B; Strand A; Sundberg K; Svensson L; Wahlberg JE; Widström L
Acta Derm Venereol; 1988; 68(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 2453990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Study on Chinese common allergens of contact dermatitis.
Fan WX; Zhao B
Derm Beruf Umwelt; 1990; 38(5):158-61. PubMed ID: 2286161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Postmarketing survey results of T.R.U.E. TEST, a new allergen patch test.
Prue C; Martinson ME; McAnally PM; Stagner WC
Am J Contact Dermat; 1998 Mar; 9(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 9471992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Recommendation to include fragrance mix 2 and hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde (Lyral) in the European baseline patch test series.
Bruze M; Andersen KE; Goossens A; ;
Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Mar; 58(3):129-33. PubMed ID: 18279149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patch testing discordance alert: false-negative findings with rubber additives and fragrances.
Sherertz EF; Fransway AF; Belsito DV; DeLeo VA; Fowler JF; Maibach HI; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Rietschel RL; Taylor JS
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2001 Aug; 45(2):313-4. PubMed ID: 11464199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of reactivity to allergens using the TRUE Test and IQ chamber system.
Lazarov A; David M; Abraham D; Trattner A
Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Mar; 56(3):140-5. PubMed ID: 17295688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative study of TRUE Test and Finn Chamber patch test techniques in Singapore.
Goh CL
Contact Dermatitis; 1992 Aug; 27(2):84-9. PubMed ID: 1395634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contact sensitivity to standard series allergens in 1038 patients with contact dermatitis in Turkey.
Akyol A; Boyvat A; Peksari Y; Gürgey E
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Jun; 52(6):333-7. PubMed ID: 15932585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Which test chambers should be used for acetone, ethanol, and water solutions when patch testing?
Isaksson M; Gruvberger B; Frick-Engfeldt M; Bruze M
Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Aug; 57(2):134-6. PubMed ID: 17627666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Contact dermatitis of the hands: cross-sectional analyses of North American Contact Dermatitis Group Data, 1994-2004.
Warshaw EM; Ahmed RL; Belsito DV; DeLeo VA; Fowler JF; Maibach HI; Marks JG; Toby Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Rietschel RL; Sasseville D; Storrs FJ; Taylor JS; Zug KA;
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2007 Aug; 57(2):301-14. PubMed ID: 17553593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 1998 to 2000.
Marks JG; Belsito DV; DeLeo VA; Fowler JF; Fransway AF; Maibach HI; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Rietschel RL; Sherertz EF; Storrs FJ; Taylor JS;
Am J Contact Dermat; 2003 Jun; 14(2):59-62. PubMed ID: 14749021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sesquiterpene lactone mix patch testing supplemented with dandelion extract in patients with allergic contact dermatitis, atopic dermatitis and non-allergic chronic inflammatory skin diseases.
Jovanović M; Poljacki M; Mimica-Dukić N; Boza P; Vujanović Lj; Duran V; Stojanović S
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Sep; 51(3):101-10. PubMed ID: 15479198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
