These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11712972)

  • 1. Selection for litter size in pigs. II. Efficiency of closed and open selection lines.
    Bolet G; Bidanel JP; Ollivier L
    Genet Sel Evol; 2001; 33(5):515-28. PubMed ID: 11712972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of 28 generations of selection for reproduction, growth, and carcass traits in swine.
    Hsu WL; Johnson RK
    J Anim Sci; 2014 Nov; 92(11):4806-22. PubMed ID: 25349336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multivariate analysis of litter size for multiple parities with production traits in pigs: II. Response to selection for litter size and correlated response to production traits.
    Noguera JL; Varona L; Babot D; Estany J
    J Anim Sci; 2002 Oct; 80(10):2548-55. PubMed ID: 12413076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Direct and correlated responses to two-stage selection for ovulation rate and number of fully formed pigs at birth in swine.
    Ruíz-Flores A; Johnson RK
    J Anim Sci; 2001 Sep; 79(9):2286-97. PubMed ID: 11583415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Incidence of splayleg pigs in Nebraska litter size selection lines.
    Holl JW; Johnson RK
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Jan; 83(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 15583040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genetic parameters and predicted selection results for maternal traits related to lactation efficiency in sows.
    Bergsma R; Kanis E; Verstegen MW; Knol EF
    J Anim Sci; 2008 May; 86(5):1067-80. PubMed ID: 18192550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Correlated responses for litter traits to six generations of selection for ovulation rate or prenatal survival in French Large White pigs.
    Rosendo A; Druet T; Gogué J; Canario L; Bidanel JP
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Jul; 85(7):1615-24. PubMed ID: 17371794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Responses to 19 generations of litter size selection in the Nebraska Index line. I. Reproductive responses estimated in pure line and crossbred litters.
    Petry DB; Johnson RK
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Apr; 82(4):1000-6. PubMed ID: 15080320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Results from nine generations of selection for increased litter size in swine.
    Holl JW; Robison OW
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Mar; 81(3):624-9. PubMed ID: 12661642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Direct responses to six generations of selection for ovulation rate or prenatal survival in Large White pigs.
    Rosendo A; Druet T; Gogué J; Bidanel JP
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Feb; 85(2):356-64. PubMed ID: 17235020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Responses in ovulation rate, embryonal survival, and litter traits in swine to 14 generations of selection to increase litter size.
    Johnson RK; Nielsen MK; Casey DS
    J Anim Sci; 1999 Mar; 77(3):541-57. PubMed ID: 10229349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Effect of population size of performance test on short-term selection result of sire line].
    Zhang H; Li JQ; Wang C; Liu XH; Chen YS
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2005 Jul; 32(7):696-703. PubMed ID: 16078737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Responses to 19 generations of litter size selection in the NE Index line. II. Growth and carcass responses estimated in pure line and crossbred litters.
    Petry DB; Holl JW; Johnson RK
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Jul; 82(7):1895-902. PubMed ID: 15309934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Selection for residual feed intake in growing pigs: effects on sow performance in a tropical climate.
    Renaudeau D; Gourdine JL; Fleury J; Ferchaud S; Billon Y; Noblet J; Gilbert H
    J Anim Sci; 2014 Aug; 92(8):3568-79. PubMed ID: 24987064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genetic analysis of litter size, parturition length, and birth assistance requirements in primiparous sows using a joint linear-threshold animal model.
    Holm B; Bakken M; Vangen O; Rekaya R
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Sep; 82(9):2528-33. PubMed ID: 15446467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correlated responses of pre- and postweaning growth and backfat thickness to six generations of selection for ovulation rate or prenatal survival in French Large White pigs.
    Rosendo A; Canario L; Druet T; Gogué J; Bidanel JP
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Dec; 85(12):3209-17. PubMed ID: 17609463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Selection for uterine capacity improves lifetime productivity of sows.
    Freking BA; Lents CA; Vallet JL
    Anim Reprod Sci; 2016 Apr; 167():16-21. PubMed ID: 26869209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Direct responses to selection for increased litter size, decreased age at puberty, or random selection following selection for ovulation rate in swine.
    Lamberson WR; Johnson RK; Zimmerman DR; Long TE
    J Anim Sci; 1991 Aug; 69(8):3129-43. PubMed ID: 1894548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A genetic analysis of sow productivity traits.
    Bereskin B
    J Anim Sci; 1984 Nov; 59(5):1149-63. PubMed ID: 6542565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Selection for placental efficiency in swine: genetic parameters and trends.
    Mesa H; Safranski TJ; Fischer KA; Cammack KM; Lamberson WR
    J Anim Sci; 2005 May; 83(5):983-91. PubMed ID: 15827242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.