These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11712988)

  • 1. Eye movements and familiarity effects in visual search.
    Greene HH; Rayner K
    Vision Res; 2001 Dec; 41(27):3763-73. PubMed ID: 11712988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of local fluency gradient of objects creates search asymmetry.
    Yamashita J; Kumada T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jan; 81(1):71-84. PubMed ID: 30141124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Analysis of the eye movement patterns in visual search tasks: effect of familiarity and stimulus features].
    Macedo EC; Covre P; Orsati FT; Oliveira MO; Schwartzman JS
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2007; 70(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 17505715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Searching for camouflaged targets: effects of target-background similarity on visual search.
    Neider MB; Zelinsky GJ
    Vision Res; 2006 Jul; 46(14):2217-35. PubMed ID: 16497351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. You look familiar, but I don't care: Lure rejection in hybrid visual and memory search is not based on familiarity.
    Wolfe JM; Boettcher SE; Josephs EL; Cunningham CA; Drew T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Dec; 41(6):1576-87. PubMed ID: 26191615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search.
    Rayner K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Aug; 62(8):1457-506. PubMed ID: 19449261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tracking the truth: the effect of face familiarity on eye fixations during deception.
    Millen AE; Hope L; Hillstrom AP; Vrij A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 May; 70(5):930-943. PubMed ID: 27064964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual similarity effects in categorical search.
    Alexander RG; Zelinsky GJ
    J Vis; 2011 Jul; 11(8):. PubMed ID: 21757505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A new look at novelty effects: guiding search away from old distractors.
    Yang H; Chen X; Zelinsky GJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Apr; 71(3):554-64. PubMed ID: 19304646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Anchoring gaze when categorizing faces' sex: evidence from eye-tracking data.
    Saether L; Van Belle W; Laeng B; Brennen T; Øvervoll M
    Vision Res; 2009 Nov; 49(23):2870-80. PubMed ID: 19733582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Background, an important factor in visual search.
    De Vries JP; Hooge IT; Wertheim AH; Verstraten FA
    Vision Res; 2013 Jun; 86():128-38. PubMed ID: 23623804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Familiar Face Detection in 180 ms.
    Visconti di Oleggio Castello M; Gobbini MI
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0136548. PubMed ID: 26305788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Face processing and familiarity: evidence from eye-movement data.
    Stacey PC; Walker S; Underwood JD
    Br J Psychol; 2005 Nov; 96(Pt 4):407-22. PubMed ID: 16248933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Eye spy a liar: assessing the utility of eye fixations and confidence judgments for detecting concealed recognition of faces, scenes and objects.
    Millen AE; Hope L; Hillstrom AP
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 Aug; 5(1):38. PubMed ID: 32797306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Active visual search in non-stationary scenes: coping with temporal variability and uncertainty.
    Ušćumlić M; Blankertz B
    J Neural Eng; 2016 Feb; 13(1):016015. PubMed ID: 26726921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can intertrial priming account for the similarity effect in visual search?
    Becker SI; Ansorge U; Horstmann G
    Vision Res; 2009 Jul; 49(14):1738-56. PubMed ID: 19358862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Top-down expectancy versus bottom-up guidance in search for known color-form conjunctions.
    Anderson GM; Humphreys GW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Nov; 77(8):2622-39. PubMed ID: 26198709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Saccadic context indicates information processing within visual fixations: evidence from event-related potentials and eye-movements analysis of the distractor effect.
    Graupner ST; Pannasch S; Velichkovsky BM
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Apr; 80(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 21291920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Overt and covert visual search in primates: reaction times and gaze shift strategies.
    Nothdurft HC; Pigarev IN; Kastner S
    J Integr Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 8(2):137-74. PubMed ID: 19618485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does conspicuity enhance distraction? Saliency and eye landing position when searching for objects.
    Foulsham T; Underwood G
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jun; 62(6):1088-98. PubMed ID: 19142829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.