341 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11713598)
1. Combined study of prostatic carcinoma by classical cytogenetic analysis and comparative genomic hybridization.
Verdorfer I; Hobisch A; Culig Z; Hittmair A; Bartsch G; Erdel M; Duba HC; Utermann G
Int J Oncol; 2001 Dec; 19(6):1263-70. PubMed ID: 11713598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of breast cancer polyclonality by combined chromosome banding and comparative genomic hybridization analysis.
Teixeira MR; Tsarouha H; Kraggerud SM; Pandis N; Dimitriadis E; Andersen JA; Lothe RA; Heim S
Neoplasia; 2001; 3(3):204-14. PubMed ID: 11494114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Combined cytogenetic and molecular genetic analyses of fifty-nine untreated human prostate carcinomas.
Zitzelsberger H; Szücs S; Robens E; Weier HU; Höfler H; Bauchinger M
Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 1996 Aug; 90(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 8780745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Genetic aberrations in prostate carcinoma detected by comparative genomic hybridization and microsatellite analysis: association with progression and angiogenesis.
Strohmeyer DM; Berger AP; Moore DH; Bartsch G; Klocker H; Carroll PR; Loening SA; Jensen RH
Prostate; 2004 Apr; 59(1):43-58. PubMed ID: 14991865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. DNA in situ hybridization (interphase cytogenetics) versus comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) in human cancer: detection of numerical and structural chromosome aberrations.
Van Dekken H; Krijtenburg PJ; Alers JC
Acta Histochem; 2000 Feb; 102(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 10726167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative genomic hybridization in combination with flow cytometry improves results of cytogenetic analysis of spontaneous abortions.
Lomax B; Tang S; Separovic E; Phillips D; Hillard E; Thomson T; Kalousek DK
Am J Hum Genet; 2000 May; 66(5):1516-21. PubMed ID: 10741955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative genomic hybridization based strategy for the analysis of different chromosome imbalances detected in conventional cytogenetic diagnostics.
Tönnies H; Stumm M; Wegner RD; Chudoba I; Kalscheuer V; Neitzel H
Cytogenet Cell Genet; 2001; 93(3-4):188-94. PubMed ID: 11528111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative genomic hybridization study of de novo myeloid neoplasia.
Castuma MV; Rao PH; Acevedo SH; Larripa IB
Acta Haematol; 2000; 104(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 11111118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative genomic hybridization, allelic imbalance, and fluorescence in situ hybridization on chromosome 8 in prostate cancer.
Cher ML; MacGrogan D; Bookstein R; Brown JA; Jenkins RB; Jensen RH
Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 1994 Nov; 11(3):153-62. PubMed ID: 7530484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genetic profiling of colorectal cancer liver metastases by combined comparative genomic hybridization and G-banding analysis.
Diep CB; Parada LA; Teixeira MR; Eknaes M; Nesland JM; Johansson B; Lothe RA
Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2003 Feb; 36(2):189-97. PubMed ID: 12508247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Importance of using comparative genomic hybridization to improve detection of chromosomal changes in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Jarosová M; Holzerová M; Jedlicková K; Mihál V; Zuna J; Starý J; Pospísilová D; Zemanová Z; Trka J; Blazek J; Pikalová Z; Indrák K
Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2000 Dec; 123(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 11156736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of comparative genomic hybridization with conventional karyotype and classical fluorescence in situ hybridization for prenatal and postnatal diagnosis of unbalanced chromosome abnormalities.
Lapierre JM; Cacheux V; Collot N; Da Silva F; Hervy N; Rivet D; Romana S; Wiss J; Benzaken B; Aurias A; Tachdjian G
Ann Genet; 1998; 41(3):133-40. PubMed ID: 9833066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative genomic hybridization-array analysis enhances the detection of aneuploidies and submicroscopic imbalances in spontaneous miscarriages.
Schaeffer AJ; Chung J; Heretis K; Wong A; Ledbetter DH; Lese Martin C
Am J Hum Genet; 2004 Jun; 74(6):1168-74. PubMed ID: 15127362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Genetic diagnosis by comparative genomic hybridization in adult de novo acute myelocytic leukemia.
Casas S; Aventín A; Fuentes F; Vallespí T; Granada I; Carrió A; Angel Martínez-Climent J; Solé F; Teixidó M; Bernués M; Duarte J; Maria Hernández J; Brunet S; Dolors Coll M; Sierra J
Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2004 Aug; 153(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 15325089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficacy of high-resolution comparative genomic hybridization (HR-CGH) in detection of chromosomal abnormalities in children with acute leukaemia.
Vranova V; Mentzlova D; Oltova A; Linkova V; Zezulkova D; Filkova H; Mendelova D; Sterba J; Kuglik P
Neoplasma; 2008; 55(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 18190236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Y chromosome loss and other genomic alterations in hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines analyzed by CGH and CGH array.
Park SJ; Jeong SY; Kim HJ
Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2006 Apr; 166(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 16616112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mapping of chromosomal gains and losses in prostate cancer by comparative genomic hybridization.
Joos S; Bergerheim US; Pan Y; Matsuyama H; Bentz M; du Manoir S; Lichter P
Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 1995 Dec; 14(4):267-76. PubMed ID: 8605115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cytogenetic analysis of 57 primary prostatic adenocarcinomas.
Lundgren R; Mandahl N; Heim S; Limon J; Henrikson H; Mitelman F
Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 1992 Jan; 4(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 1377005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis of kidney tumors by comparative genomic hybridization and conventional cytogenetics.
Rigola MA; Casadevall C; Bernués M; Caballín MR; Fuster C; Gelabert A; Egozcue J; Miró R
Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2002 Aug; 137(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 12377413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comprehensive molecular cytogenetic characterization of cervical cancer cell lines.
Harris CP; Lu XY; Narayan G; Singh B; Murty VV; Rao PH
Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2003 Mar; 36(3):233-41. PubMed ID: 12557223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
