274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11713876)
1. Memory interference during language processing.
Gordon PC; Hendrick R; Johnson M
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Nov; 27(6):1411-23. PubMed ID: 11713876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Linguistic complexity and information structure in Korean: evidence from eye-tracking during reading.
Lee Y; Lee H; Gordon PC
Cognition; 2007 Sep; 104(3):495-534. PubMed ID: 16970936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The role of animacy in Chinese relative clause processing.
He W; Chen B
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Sep; 144(1):145-53. PubMed ID: 23800546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Similarity-based interference during language comprehension: Evidence from eye tracking during reading.
Gordon PC; Hendrick R; Johnson M; Lee Y
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Nov; 32(6):1304-21. PubMed ID: 17087585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of age, speed of processing, and working memory on comprehension of sentences with relative clauses.
Caplan D; Dede G; Waters G; Michaud J; Tripodis Y
Psychol Aging; 2011 Jun; 26(2):439-50. PubMed ID: 21480714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of noun animacy on the processing of unambiguous sentences: evidence from French relative clauses.
Baudiffier V; Caplan D; Gaonac'h D; Chesnet D
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Oct; 64(10):1896-905. PubMed ID: 21895558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cross-Linguistic Differences in Processing Double-Embedded Relative Clauses: Working-Memory Constraints or Language Statistics?
Frank SL; Trompenaars T; Vasishth S
Cogn Sci; 2016 Apr; 40(3):554-78. PubMed ID: 25943302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Memory-load interference in syntactic processing.
Gordon PC; Hendrick R; Levine WH
Psychol Sci; 2002 Sep; 13(5):425-30. PubMed ID: 12219808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The sentence-composition effect: processing of complex sentences depends on the configuration of common noun phrases versus unusual noun phrases.
Johnson ML; Lowder MW; Gordon PC
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 Nov; 140(4):707-24. PubMed ID: 21767046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The influence of referential processing on sentence complexity.
Warren T; Gibson E
Cognition; 2002 Aug; 85(1):79-112. PubMed ID: 12086714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Chinese subject-relative clauses are more difficult to process than the object-relative clauses.
Chen B; Ning A; Bi H; Dunlap S
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 18538740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Processing Italian relative clauses: working memory span and word order effects on RTs.
Di Domenico A; Di Matteo R
J Gen Psychol; 2009 Oct; 136(4):387-406. PubMed ID: 19943612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Set-shifting and the on-line processing of relative clauses in Parkinson's disease: results from a novel eye-tracking method.
Hochstadt J
Cortex; 2009 Sep; 45(8):991-1011. PubMed ID: 19473654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relational processing and working memory capacity in comprehension of relative clause sentences.
Andrews G; Birney D; Halford GS
Mem Cognit; 2006 Sep; 34(6):1325-40. PubMed ID: 17225512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Canonical word order and interference-based integration costs during sentence comprehension: the case of Spanish subject- and object-relative clauses.
del Río D; López-Higes R; Martín-Aragoneses MT
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(11):2108-28. PubMed ID: 22524672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks.
Cheng T; Wu JT
J Vis Exp; 2019 Sep; (151):. PubMed ID: 31545324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Processing relative clauses in supportive contexts.
Fedorenko E; Piantadosi S; Gibson E
Cogn Sci; 2012 Apr; 36(3):471-97. PubMed ID: 22256956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of Age and Location in Chinese Relative Clauses Processing.
He W; Xu N; Ji R
J Psycholinguist Res; 2017 Oct; 46(5):1067-1086. PubMed ID: 28236141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A hierarchical linear modeling analysis of working memory and implicit prosody in the resolution of adjunct attachment ambiguity.
Traxler MJ
J Psycholinguist Res; 2009 Oct; 38(5):491-509. PubMed ID: 19377881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Working Memory in the Processing of Long-Distance Dependencies: Interference and Filler Maintenance.
Ness T; Meltzer-Asscher A
J Psycholinguist Res; 2017 Dec; 46(6):1353-1365. PubMed ID: 28528512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
