These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11713881)

  • 1. Automatic and intentional activation of task sets.
    Koch I
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Nov; 27(6):1474-86. PubMed ID: 11713881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cue-based preparation and stimulus-based priming of tasks in task switching.
    Koch I; Allport A
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Mar; 34(2):433-44. PubMed ID: 16752606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Advance preparation in task switching: what work is being done?
    Altmann EM
    Psychol Sci; 2004 Sep; 15(9):616-22. PubMed ID: 15327633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preparatory processes in the task-switching paradigm: evidence from the use of probability cues.
    Dreisbach G; Haider H; Kluwe RH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 May; 28(3):468-83. PubMed ID: 12018499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Short cue presentations encourage advance task preparation: a recipe to diminish the residual switch cost.
    Verbruggen F; Liefooghe B; Vandierendonck A; Demanet J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):342-56. PubMed ID: 17352616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Heightened conflict in cue-target translation increases backward inhibition in set switching.
    Grange JA; Houghton G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):1003-9. PubMed ID: 20565215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of response selection for inhibition of task sets in task shifting.
    Schuch S; Koch I
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Feb; 29(1):92-105. PubMed ID: 12669750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of task preparation and task inhibition in age-related task-switching deficits.
    Lawo V; Philipp AM; Schuch S; Koch I
    Psychol Aging; 2012 Dec; 27(4):1130-7. PubMed ID: 22468851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cue-task associations in task switching.
    Gade M; Koch I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Jun; 60(6):762-9. PubMed ID: 17514592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differential effects of cue changes and task changes on task-set selection costs.
    Mayr U; Kliegl R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 May; 29(3):362-72. PubMed ID: 12776747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cognitive control under stress: how stress affects strategies of task-set reconfiguration.
    Steinhauser M; Maier M; Hübner R
    Psychol Sci; 2007 Jun; 18(6):540-5. PubMed ID: 17576268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inhibition of response mode in task switching.
    Koch I; Gade M; Philipp AM
    Exp Psychol; 2004; 51(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 14959506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is performance in task-cuing experiments mediated by task set selection or associative compound retrieval?
    Forrest CL; Monsell S; McLaren IP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jul; 40(4):1002-24. PubMed ID: 24564543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of recent practice on task switching.
    Yeung N; Monsell S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):919-36. PubMed ID: 14585014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implicit learning of sequences of tasks.
    Heuer H; Schmidtke V; Kleinsorge T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Jul; 27(4):967-83. PubMed ID: 11486930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The interplay of crossmodal attentional preparation and modality compatibility in cued task switching.
    Fintor E; Stephan DN; Koch I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Apr; 72(4):955-965. PubMed ID: 29642783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Implicit sequence learning with competing explicit cues.
    Jiménez L; Méndez C
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 May; 54(2):345-69. PubMed ID: 11394051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can the task-cuing paradigm measure an endogenous task-set reconfiguration process?
    Monsell S; Mizon GA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Jun; 32(3):493-516. PubMed ID: 16822121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Switching, plasticity, and prediction in a saccadic task-switch paradigm.
    Barton JJ; Greenzang C; Hefter R; Edelman J; Manoach DS
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Jan; 168(1-2):76-87. PubMed ID: 16096781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automatic sequential response priming and intentional response preparation in choice reaction tasks: evidence from response repetition and response cuing.
    Adam JJ; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Sep; 132(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 19559396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.