322 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11714165)
1. Lack of dental uniqueness between two bite mark suspects.
Pretty IA; Turnbull MD
J Forensic Sci; 2001 Nov; 46(6):1487-91. PubMed ID: 11714165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Toneline bite mark photography.
Robinson E; Wentzel J
J Forensic Sci; 1992 Jan; 37(1):195-207. PubMed ID: 1545200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Bite mark analysis. Part 1. Methods and overview].
De Valck E
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1995 Jun; 102(6):221-3. PubMed ID: 11836809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bite mark analysis and comparison using image perception technology.
van der Velden A; Spiessens M; Willems G
J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2006 Jun; 24(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 16783951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of bite mark overlays: a comparison of five common methods to produce exemplars from a suspect's dentition.
Sweet D; Bowers CM
J Forensic Sci; 1998 Mar; 43(2):362-7. PubMed ID: 9544542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Unusual three-dimensional bite mark evidence in a homicide case.
Vale GL; Sognnaes RF; Felando GN; Noguchi TT
J Forensic Sci; 1976 Jul; 21(3):642-52. PubMed ID: 956753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The use of human skin in the fabrication of a bite mark template: two case reports.
West MH; Barsley RE; Frair J; Seal MD
J Forensic Sci; 1990 Nov; 35(6):1477-85. PubMed ID: 2262782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Assignment of a bite-mark on the victim's skin to the dentition of the perpetrator by means of anomalies in the number and position of the frontal teeth].
Friedrich RE; Scheuer HA; Schulz F
Arch Kriminol; 2005; 215(1-2):11-7. PubMed ID: 15757212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An integrated technique for the analysis of skin bite marks.
Bernitz H; Owen JH; van Heerden WF; Solheim T
J Forensic Sci; 2008 Jan; 53(1):194-8. PubMed ID: 18279256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison between direct and indirect methods available for human bite mark analysis.
Kouble RF; Craig GT
J Forensic Sci; 2004 Jan; 49(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 14979355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A practical technique for the fabrication of transparent bite mark overlays.
Dailey JC
J Forensic Sci; 1991 Mar; 36(2):565-70. PubMed ID: 2066731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Two bite mark cases with inadequate scale references.
Bernstein ML
J Forensic Sci; 1985 Jul; 30(3):958-64. PubMed ID: 4031821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computer-based production of bite mark comparison overlays.
Sweet D; Parhar M; Wood RE
J Forensic Sci; 1998 Sep; 43(5):1050-5. PubMed ID: 9729824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Error rates in bite mark analysis in an in vivo animal model.
Avon SL; Victor C; Mayhall JT; Wood RE
Forensic Sci Int; 2010 Sep; 201(1-3):45-55. PubMed ID: 20457498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Photographic techniques of concern in metric bite mark analysis.
Krauss TC
J Forensic Sci; 1984 Apr; 29(2):633-8. PubMed ID: 6726167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison between five commonly used two-dimensional methods of human bite mark overlay production from the dental study casts.
Maloth S; Ganapathy KS
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(3):493. PubMed ID: 22048597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Human bite marks in forensic dentistry.
Wright FD; Dailey JC
Dent Clin North Am; 2001 Apr; 45(2):365-97. PubMed ID: 11370460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Identification from bite marks].
Schulz P
Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1980 Feb; 35(2):239-43. PubMed ID: 6931762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Bite mark analysis. Part 2. A selection of Dutch cases].
van Dijk EA
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1995 Jun; 102(6):224-7. PubMed ID: 11836810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Comparison of bite marks and teeth features using 2D and 3D methods].
Lorkiewicz-Muszyńska D; Glapiński M; Zaba C; Łabecka M
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2011; 61(2):107-14. PubMed ID: 22390125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
