These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11714917)

  • 1. Free energies of protein decoys provide insight into determinants of protein stability.
    Vorobjev YN; Hermans J
    Protein Sci; 2001 Dec; 10(12):2498-506. PubMed ID: 11714917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. ES/IS: estimation of conformational free energy by combining dynamics simulations with explicit solvent with an implicit solvent continuum model.
    Vorobjev YN; Hermans J
    Biophys Chem; 1999 Apr; 78(1-2):195-205. PubMed ID: 10343388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A decoy set for the thermostable subdomain from chicken villin headpiece, comparison of different free energy estimators.
    Fogolari F; Tosatto SC; Colombo G
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 6():301. PubMed ID: 16354298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Discrimination between native and intentionally misfolded conformations of proteins: ES/IS, a new method for calculating conformational free energy that uses both dynamics simulations with an explicit solvent and an implicit solvent continuum model.
    Vorobjev YN; Almagro JC; Hermans J
    Proteins; 1998 Sep; 32(4):399-413. PubMed ID: 9726412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modification and optimization of the united-residue (UNRES) potential energy function for canonical simulations. I. Temperature dependence of the effective energy function and tests of the optimization method with single training proteins.
    Liwo A; Khalili M; Czaplewski C; Kalinowski S; Ołdziej S; Wachucik K; Scheraga HA
    J Phys Chem B; 2007 Jan; 111(1):260-85. PubMed ID: 17201450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Distinguishing native conformations of proteins from decoys with an effective free energy estimator based on the OPLS all-atom force field and the Surface Generalized Born solvent model.
    Felts AK; Gallicchio E; Wallqvist A; Levy RM
    Proteins; 2002 Aug; 48(2):404-22. PubMed ID: 12112706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of decoys to optimize an all-atom force field including hydration.
    Arnautova YA; Scheraga HA
    Biophys J; 2008 Sep; 95(5):2434-49. PubMed ID: 18502794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How well can we predict native contacts in proteins based on decoy structures and their energies?
    Zhu J; Zhu Q; Shi Y; Liu H
    Proteins; 2003 Sep; 52(4):598-608. PubMed ID: 12910459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can a continuum solvent model reproduce the free energy landscape of a beta -hairpin folding in water?
    Zhou R; Berne BJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2002 Oct; 99(20):12777-82. PubMed ID: 12242327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Free energies of protein decoys provide insight into determinants of protein stability.
    Vorobjev YN; Hermans J
    Protein Sci; 2002 Apr; 11(4):994. PubMed ID: 11910042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimized distance-dependent atom-pair-based potential DOOP for protein structure prediction.
    Chae MH; Krull F; Knapp EW
    Proteins; 2015 May; 83(5):881-90. PubMed ID: 25693513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Binding free energy analysis of protein-protein docking model structures by evERdock.
    Takemura K; Matubayasi N; Kitao A
    J Chem Phys; 2018 Mar; 148(10):105101. PubMed ID: 29544320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Structure refinement of protein model decoys requires accurate side-chain placement.
    Olson MA; Lee MS
    Proteins; 2013 Mar; 81(3):469-78. PubMed ID: 23070940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of Predicted Protein-Protein Complexes by Binding Free Energy Simulations.
    Siebenmorgen T; Zacharias M
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 Mar; 15(3):2071-2086. PubMed ID: 30698954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. TOUCHSTONE II: a new approach to ab initio protein structure prediction.
    Zhang Y; Kolinski A; Skolnick J
    Biophys J; 2003 Aug; 85(2):1145-64. PubMed ID: 12885659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hydrophobic potential of mean force as a solvation function for protein structure prediction.
    Lin MS; Fawzi NL; Head-Gordon T
    Structure; 2007 Jun; 15(6):727-40. PubMed ID: 17562319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Develop and test a solvent accessible surface area-based model in conformational entropy calculations.
    Wang J; Hou T
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 May; 52(5):1199-212. PubMed ID: 22497310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Converging free energy estimates: MM-PB(GB)SA studies on the protein-protein complex Ras-Raf.
    Gohlke H; Case DA
    J Comput Chem; 2004 Jan; 25(2):238-50. PubMed ID: 14648622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Free energy landscape of protein folding in water: explicit vs. implicit solvent.
    Zhou R
    Proteins; 2003 Nov; 53(2):148-61. PubMed ID: 14517967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Connecting free energy surfaces in implicit and explicit solvent: an efficient method to compute conformational and solvation free energies.
    Deng N; Zhang BW; Levy RM
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2015 Jun; 11(6):2868-78. PubMed ID: 26236174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.