These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11715863)

  • 1. Copayment dispute won by HMO members. Corsini v. United Healthcare Services, Inc.
    Hosp Law Newsl; 2001 Dec; 19(2):3-6. PubMed ID: 11715863
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. HMOs--copayments. Lefler v. United Healthcare of Utah, Inc.
    Benefits Q; 2006; 22(1):53-5. PubMed ID: 16792392
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prescription drug copayments--fiduciary duty--plan discounts--disclosure. Alves v. Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Inc.
    Benefits Q; 2005; 21(2):61-3. PubMed ID: 15977753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. ERISA plan defined--preemption. Marcella v. Capital District Physicians' Health Plan, Inc.
    Benefits Q; 2003; 19(3):51-3. PubMed ID: 12964294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Independent review of HMO decisions: The Supreme Court hears oral argument in Rush Prudential HMO, Inc. v. Moran.
    Drenning MG
    Health Care Law Mon; 2002 Feb; ():3-5. PubMed ID: 12436733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Should your ERISA remedy depend upon your geography?: an analysis of Rush Prudential HMO, INC. v. Moran.
    Schulz AM
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2003; 19(2):553-71. PubMed ID: 14748257
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. HMO liability for the use of financial incentive arrangements in the provision of health care.
    Terry BX
    Health Care Law Mon; 2000 Feb; ():3-12. PubMed ID: 10947557
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Groping for the reins: ERISA, HMO malpractice, and enterprise liability.
    Kilcullen JK
    Am J Law Med; 1996; 22(1):7-50. PubMed ID: 8819595
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The final chapter (maybe) of preemption of HMO accountability under state law.
    Jordan K
    Health Care Law Mon; 2004 Feb; ():15-27. PubMed ID: 14989070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. HMOS--independent medical review--preemption. Rush Prudential HMO, Inc. v. Moran.
    Benefits Q; 2003; 19(2):96-8. PubMed ID: 12827843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. HMOs--financial incentives--disclosure. Horvath v. Keystone Health Plan East, Inc.
    Benefits Q; 2005; 21(2):60-1. PubMed ID: 15977752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Supreme court upholds state independent review laws: does this help or hinder health plans?
    Bloom A
    Manag Care Interface; 2002 Sep; 15(9):56-7, 61. PubMed ID: 12244651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ERISA preemption defenses rejected. Nealy v. US Healthcare HMO.
    Hosp Law Newsl; 2000 Jan; 17(3):4-6. PubMed ID: 10724626
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. U.S. Supreme Court validates HMO financial incentives and further undermines professionalism in the practice of medicine.
    Gale AH
    Mo Med; 2000 Oct; 97(10):475-6. PubMed ID: 11043028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Litigating around ERISA to quality managed healthcare: an HMO can breach fiduciary duties.
    Karns JE
    Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 2001 Mar; (263):9-30. PubMed ID: 11291401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Disclosure--fiduciary duty--primary care physician incentives. Horvath v. Keystone Health Plan East, Inc.
    Benefits Q; 2003; 19(4):87-9. PubMed ID: 14735661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Supreme Court rejects preemption in ERISA benefits dispute. Rush Prudential, Inc. v. Moran.
    Morreim EH
    Hosp Law Newsl; 2002 Nov; 20(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 12412312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evolving tension between HMO liability precedent and legislation.
    Mansfield NR; Gabel JT; Jablow LB
    Tort Insur Law J; 2001; 36(4):949-78. PubMed ID: 11939226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preemption--HMOs--independent physician review of medical necessity. Moran v. Rush Prudential HMO, Inc., 230 F.3d 959 (7th Cir. 2000), cert. granted,--U.S.--150 L.Ed.2d 749 (2001).
    Benefits Q; 2002; 18(4):70-2. PubMed ID: 12407899
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. HMO liability battleground moving to courts, statehouse.
    Briskin A; Hinkley G
    Manag Care; 1999 Nov; 8(11):22, 25. PubMed ID: 10977316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.