These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

59 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11718008)

  • 1. [Inferring landmark displacements from changes in cephalometric angles].
    Xu T; Baumrind S
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2001 Jul; 36(4):269-72. PubMed ID: 11718008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do bivariate and multivariate cephalometric analyses lead to different results concerning the skeletal cause of postnormal occlusion?
    Gesch D; Kirbschus A; Gedrange T
    Funct Orthod; 2005; 22(2):6-8, 10, 12-3. PubMed ID: 16536177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of AI-assisted cephalometric analysis and orthodontist-performed digital tracing analysis.
    Bor S; Ciğerim SÇ; Kotan S
    Prog Orthod; 2024 Oct; 25(1):41. PubMed ID: 39428414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Two-dimensional lateral cephalometric evaluation of varying types of Class II subgroups on posterior airway space in postadolescent girls: a pilot study.
    Oz U; Orhan K; Rubenduz M
    J Orofac Orthop; 2013 Jan; 74(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 23307178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Sensitivity of four representative angular cephalometric measures].
    Xü T; Ahn J; Baumrind S
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2000 May; 35(3):221-3. PubMed ID: 11787487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Postpharyngeal lymphoid tissue in Angle Class I and Class II malocclusions.
    Sosa FA; Graber TM; Muller TP
    Am J Orthod; 1982 Apr; 81(4):299-309. PubMed ID: 6960717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [A roentgeno-cephalometric study on the craniofacial morphology and growth change of Angle Class II division 1 malocclusion by using Ricketts analysis].
    Tokuda N
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1987 Dec; 46(4):650-72. PubMed ID: 3506574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Investigation of pre- and post-treatment cephalometric measurements of the subjects treated by Edgewise technique].
    Erdem A; Deniz E; Ceylan I
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1990 Apr; 3(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 2101658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Craniofacial parameters of Syrian children with β-thalassemia major.
    Takriti M; Dashash M
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 May; 2(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 25426607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automatic landmarking of cephalograms using active appearance models.
    Vucinić P; Trpovski Z; Sćepan I
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):233-41. PubMed ID: 20203126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [A comparative study of cephalometric variation of the skeletal and dentoalveolar structures after treatment with the Begg, Ricketts and edgewise technic in cases of Class I and Class II malocclusions treated with and without extractions].
    Saurel-Passebosc C; Parguel P; Mossé A
    Orthod Fr; 1989; 60 Pt 2():873-94. PubMed ID: 2490264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Activator versus cervical headgear: superimpositional cephalometric comparison.
    Haralabakis NB; Halazonetis DJ; Sifakakis IB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):296-305. PubMed ID: 12637902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of soft tissue facial morphometry in children with Class I and Class II occlusions.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Serrao G; Puletto S; Bignotto M; Tartaglia G
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1994; 9(3):187-94. PubMed ID: 7814923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile of Turkish adults.
    Malkoç S; Demir A; Uysal T; Canbuldu N
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 19064675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Angles of facial convexity in different skeletal Classes.
    Godt A; Müller A; Kalwitzki M; Göz G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 29(6):648-53. PubMed ID: 17878186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sagittal and vertical growth of the jaws in Class II, Division 1 and Class II, Division 2 malocclusions during prepubertal and pubertal development.
    Lux CJ; Raeth O; Burden D; Conradt C; Komposch G
    J Orofac Orthop; 2004 Jul; 65(4):290-311. PubMed ID: 15289922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dental and facial skeletal characteristics and growth of females and males with Class II Division 1 malocclusion between the ages of 10 and 14 (revisited). Part II. Anteroposterior and vertical circumpubertal growth.
    Rothstein T; Phan XL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Nov; 120(5):542-55. PubMed ID: 11709673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of vertical parameters in cephalometry.
    Bock JJ; Fuhrmann RA
    J Orofac Orthop; 2007 May; 68(3):210-22. PubMed ID: 17522805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Changes in mandibular position in treated Class II division 2 malocclusions in growing and non-growing subjects.
    AL-Nimri K; Abo-Zomor M; Alomari S
    Aust Orthod J; 2016 May; 32(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 27468594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Condylar asymmetry measurements in patients with an Angle's Class III malocclusion.
    Miller VJ; Bodner L
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Mar; 24(3):247-9. PubMed ID: 9131483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.