146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11719567)
1. Reliabilities of parsimony-based and likelihood-based methods for detecting positive selection at single amino acid sites.
Suzuki Y; Nei M
Mol Biol Evol; 2001 Dec; 18(12):2179-85. PubMed ID: 11719567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A method for detecting positive selection at single amino acid sites.
Suzuki Y; Gojobori T
Mol Biol Evol; 1999 Oct; 16(10):1315-28. PubMed ID: 10563013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inferring natural selection operating on conservative and radical substitution at single amino acid sites.
Suzuki Y
Genes Genet Syst; 2007 Aug; 82(4):341-60. PubMed ID: 17895585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. False-positive selection identified by ML-based methods: examples from the Sig1 gene of the diatom Thalassiosira weissflogii and the tax gene of a human T-cell lymphotropic virus.
Suzuki Y; Nei M
Mol Biol Evol; 2004 May; 21(5):914-21. PubMed ID: 15014169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Simulation study of the reliability and robustness of the statistical methods for detecting positive selection at single amino acid sites.
Suzuki Y; Nei M
Mol Biol Evol; 2002 Nov; 19(11):1865-9. PubMed ID: 12411595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. New methods for detecting positive selection at single amino acid sites.
Suzuki Y
J Mol Evol; 2004 Jul; 59(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 15383903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony and likelihood methods.
Yang Z
J Mol Evol; 1996 Feb; 42(2):294-307. PubMed ID: 8919881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy and power of statistical methods for detecting adaptive evolution in protein coding sequences and for identifying positively selected sites.
Wong WS; Yang Z; Goldman N; Nielsen R
Genetics; 2004 Oct; 168(2):1041-51. PubMed ID: 15514074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Frequent false detection of positive selection by the likelihood method with branch-site models.
Zhang J
Mol Biol Evol; 2004 Jul; 21(7):1332-9. PubMed ID: 15014150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relative efficiencies of the maximum-likelihood, neighbor-joining, and maximum-parsimony methods when substitution rate varies with site.
Tateno Y; Takezaki N; Nei M
Mol Biol Evol; 1994 Mar; 11(2):261-77. PubMed ID: 8170367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A new method of inference of ancestral nucleotide and amino acid sequences.
Yang Z; Kumar S; Nei M
Genetics; 1995 Dec; 141(4):1641-50. PubMed ID: 8601501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Bayesian model comparison approach to inferring positive selection.
Scheffler K; Seoighe C
Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Dec; 22(12):2531-40. PubMed ID: 16120799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Approximate methods for estimating the pattern of nucleotide substitution and the variation of substitution rates among sites.
Yang Z; Kumar S
Mol Biol Evol; 1996 May; 13(5):650-9. PubMed ID: 8676739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of an improved branch-site likelihood method for detecting positive selection at the molecular level.
Zhang J; Nielsen R; Yang Z
Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Dec; 22(12):2472-9. PubMed ID: 16107592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-dimensional window analysis for detecting positive selection at structural regions of proteins.
Suzuki Y
Mol Biol Evol; 2004 Dec; 21(12):2352-9. PubMed ID: 15356273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ancestral sequence reconstruction in primate mitochondrial DNA: compositional bias and effect on functional inference.
Krishnan NM; Seligmann H; Stewart CB; De Koning AP; Pollock DD
Mol Biol Evol; 2004 Oct; 21(10):1871-83. PubMed ID: 15229290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of positive selection on a sexual reproduction gene in Thalassiosira weissflogii (Bacillariophyta): results obtained from maximum-likelihood and parsimony-based methods.
Sorhannus U
Mol Biol Evol; 2003 Aug; 20(8):1326-8. PubMed ID: 12777506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Maximum likelihood outperforms maximum parsimony even when evolutionary rates are heterotachous.
Gadagkar SR; Kumar S
Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Nov; 22(11):2139-41. PubMed ID: 16014870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluating the robustness of phylogenetic methods to among-site variability in substitution processes.
Holder MT; Zwickl DJ; Dessimoz C
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2008 Dec; 363(1512):4013-21. PubMed ID: 18852108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Maximum likelihood estimation on large phylogenies and analysis of adaptive evolution in human influenza virus A.
Yang Z
J Mol Evol; 2000 Nov; 51(5):423-32. PubMed ID: 11080365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
