These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11720352)

  • 1. Partial signal space projection for artefact removal in MEG measurements: a theoretical analysis.
    Nolte G; Hämäläinen MS
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Nov; 46(11):2873-87. PubMed ID: 11720352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of artifact rejection by signal-space projection on source localization accuracy in MEG measurements.
    Nolte G; Curio G
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1999 Apr; 46(4):400-8. PubMed ID: 10217878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimation of neural dynamics from MEG/EEG cortical current density maps: application to the reconstruction of large-scale cortical synchrony.
    David O; Garnero L; Cosmelli D; Varela FJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Sep; 49(9):975-87. PubMed ID: 12214887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving MEG performance with additional tangential sensors.
    Nurminen J; Taulu S; Nenonen J; Helle L; Simola J; Ahonen A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2013 Sep; 60(9):2559-66. PubMed ID: 23649129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Truncated RAP-MUSIC (TRAP-MUSIC) for MEG and EEG source localization.
    Mäkelä N; Stenroos M; Sarvas J; Ilmoniemi RJ
    Neuroimage; 2018 Feb; 167():73-83. PubMed ID: 29128542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Phase-interpolated averaging for analyzing electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography epochs.
    Matani A; Naruse Y; Terazono Y; Fujimaki N; Murata T
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 Jan; 58(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 20889427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multimodal functional imaging using fMRI-informed regional EEG/MEG source estimation.
    Ou W; Nummenmaa A; Ahveninen J; Belliveau JW; Hämäläinen MS; Golland P
    Neuroimage; 2010 Aug; 52(1):97-108. PubMed ID: 20211266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Error bounds for EEG and MEG dipole source localization.
    Mosher JC; Spencer ME; Leahy RM; Lewis PS
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993 May; 86(5):303-21. PubMed ID: 7685264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Anatomical constraints on source models for high-resolution EEG and MEG derived from MRI.
    Srinivasan R
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Aug; 5(4):389-99. PubMed ID: 16866569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Source localization of EEG/MEG data by correlating columns of ICA and lead field matrices.
    Hild KE; Nagarajan SS
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Nov; 56(11):2619-26. PubMed ID: 19695993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Large scale Kalman filtering solutions to the electrophysiological source localization problem--a MEG case study.
    Long CJ; Purdon RL; Temereanca S; Desai NU; Hämäläinen M; Brown EN
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():4532-5. PubMed ID: 17947095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Current dipole localization with an ideal magnetometer system.
    Lütkenhöner B
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1996 Nov; 43(11):1049-61. PubMed ID: 9214823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rejection of artifact sources in magnetoencephalogram background activity using independent component analysis.
    Escudero J; Hornero R; Abásolo D; Poza J; Fernández A; López M
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():5282-5. PubMed ID: 17945889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rejecting deep brain stimulation artefacts from MEG data using ICA and mutual information.
    Abbasi O; Hirschmann J; Schmitz G; Schnitzler A; Butz M
    J Neurosci Methods; 2016 Aug; 268():131-41. PubMed ID: 27090949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Calibration of a multichannel MEG system based on the signal space separation method.
    Chella F; Zappasodi F; Marzetti L; Della Penna S; Pizzella V
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Aug; 57(15):4855-70. PubMed ID: 22797687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The comparative performance of DBS artefact rejection methods for MEG recordings.
    Kandemir AL; Litvak V; Florin E
    Neuroimage; 2020 Oct; 219():117057. PubMed ID: 32540355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A hierarchical Bayesian method to resolve an inverse problem of MEG contaminated with eye movement artifacts.
    Fujiwara Y; Yamashita O; Kawawaki D; Doya K; Kawato M; Toyama K; Sato MA
    Neuroimage; 2009 Apr; 45(2):393-409. PubMed ID: 19150653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bayesian multi-dipole modelling in the frequency domain.
    Luria G; Duran D; Visani E; Sommariva S; Rotondi F; Rossi Sebastiano D; Panzica F; Piana M; Sorrentino A
    J Neurosci Methods; 2019 Jan; 312():27-36. PubMed ID: 30452978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Direct reconstruction algorithm of current dipoles for vector magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography.
    Nara T; Oohama J; Hashimoto M; Takeda T; Ando S
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3859-79. PubMed ID: 17664582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of MEG source reconstruction method on source-space connectivity estimation: A comparison between minimum-norm solution and beamforming.
    Hincapié AS; Kujala J; Mattout J; Pascarella A; Daligault S; Delpuech C; Mery D; Cosmelli D; Jerbi K
    Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 156():29-42. PubMed ID: 28479475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.