BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11720824)

  • 1. Additional value of electrical impedance scanning: experience of 240 histologically-proven breast lesions.
    Malich A; Böhm T; Facius M; Freessmeyer M; Fleck M; Anderson R; Kaiser WA
    Eur J Cancer; 2001 Dec; 37(18):2324-30. PubMed ID: 11720824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Differentiation of mammographically suspicious lesions: evaluation of breast ultrasound, MRI mammography and electrical impedance scanning as adjunctive technologies in breast cancer detection.
    Malich A; Boehm T; Facius M; Freesmeyer MG; Fleck M; Anderson R; Kaiser WA
    Clin Radiol; 2001 Apr; 56(4):278-83. PubMed ID: 11286578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Electrical impedance scanning in the differentiation of suspicious breast lesions: comparison with mammography, ultrasound and histopathology].
    Fuchsjäger MH; Helbich TH; Ringl H; Funovics MA; Rudas M; Riedl C; Pfarl G
    Rofo; 2002 Dec; 174(12):1522-9. PubMed ID: 12471524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electrical impedance scanning for classifying suspicious breast lesions: first results.
    Malich A; Fritsch T; Anderson R; Boehm T; Freesmeyer MG; Fleck M; Kaiser WA
    Eur Radiol; 2000; 10(10):1555-61. PubMed ID: 11044924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The negative predictive value of electrical impedance scanning in BI-RADS category IV breast lesions.
    Fuchsjaeger MH; Flöry D; Reiner CS; Rudas M; Riedl CC; Helbich TH
    Invest Radiol; 2005 Jul; 40(7):478-85. PubMed ID: 15973141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic potential of targeted electrical impedance scanning in classifying suspicious breast lesions.
    Wersebe A; Siegmann K; Krainick U; Fersis N; Vogel U; Claussen CD; Müller-Schimpfle M
    Invest Radiol; 2002 Feb; 37(2):65-72. PubMed ID: 11799329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of size and depth on accuracy of electrical impedance scanning.
    Malich A; Facius M; Anderson R; Böttcher J; Sauner D; Hansch A; Marx C; Petrovitch A; Pfleiderer S; Kaiser W
    Eur Radiol; 2003 Nov; 13(11):2441-6. PubMed ID: 12845465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effectiveness of breast electrical impedance imaging for clinically suspicious breast lesions.
    Daglar G; Senol K; Yakut ZI; Yuksek YN; Tutuncu T; Tez M; Yesiltepe CH
    Bratisl Lek Listy; 2016; 117(9):505-510. PubMed ID: 27677193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Value of electrical impedance scanning (EIS) in the evaluation of BI-RADS III/IV/V-lesions.
    Diebold T; Jacobi V; Scholz B; Hensel C; Solbach C; Kaufmann M; Viana F; Balzer J; Peters J; Vogl T
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2005 Feb; 4(1):93-7. PubMed ID: 15649092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electrical impedance scanning used in addition to ultrasound for the verification of submandibular and parotid lesions: initial results.
    Facius M; Malich A; Schneider G; Boehm T; Anderson R; Kaiser WA
    Invest Radiol; 2002 Aug; 37(8):421-7. PubMed ID: 12138357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of electrical impedance scanning in the differentiation of sonographically suspicious and highly suspicious lymph nodes of the head-neck region.
    Malich A; Boehm T; Facius M; Mentzel HJ; Fleck M; Boettcher J; Anderson R; Kaiser WA
    Eur Radiol; 2002 May; 12(5):1114-20. PubMed ID: 11976855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electrical impedance scanning in breast tumor imaging: correlation with the growth pattern of lesion.
    Wang K; Wang T; Fu F; Ji ZY; Liu RG; Liao QM; Dong XZ
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Jul; 122(13):1501-6. PubMed ID: 19719937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer.
    Berg WA; Gutierrez L; NessAiver MS; Carter WB; Bhargavan M; Lewis RS; Ioffe OB
    Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):830-49. PubMed ID: 15486214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Utilisation of electrical impedance tomography and/or ultrasound and mammography in breast disease diagnosis: a controlled study].
    Xu F; Li MX; Jusko HZ; Jiang H
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 May; 97(18):1391-1395. PubMed ID: 28535624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electrical impedance scanning in breast cancer imaging: correlation with mammographic and histologic diagnosis.
    Martín G; Martín R; Brieva MJ; Santamaría L
    Eur Radiol; 2002 Jun; 12(6):1471-8. PubMed ID: 12042956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prospective study on combination of electrical impedance scanning and ultrasound in estimating risk of development of breast cancer in young women.
    Wang T; Wang K; Yao Q; Chen JH; Ling R; Zhang JL; Dong XZ; Fu F; Dou KF; Wang L
    Cancer Invest; 2010 Mar; 28(3):295-303. PubMed ID: 19857040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electrical impedance scanning of lymph nodes: initial clinical and technical findings.
    Malich A; Boehm T; Facius M; Freesmeyer M; Azhari T; Werner B; Anderson R; Kaiser WA
    Clin Radiol; 2002 Jul; 57(7):579-86. PubMed ID: 12096855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Breast imaging using 3D electrical impedence tomography.
    Prasad SN; Houserkova D; Campbell J
    Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub; 2008 Jun; 152(1):151-4. PubMed ID: 18795091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electrical impedance spectroscopy of the breast: clinical imaging results in 26 subjects.
    Kerner TE; Paulsen KD; Hartov A; Soho SK; Poplack SP
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 Jun; 21(6):638-45. PubMed ID: 12166860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tubular carcinoma of the breast: sensitivity of diagnostic techniques and correlation with histopathology.
    Mitnick JS; Gianutsos R; Pollack AH; Susman M; Baskin BL; Ko WD; Pressman PI; Feiner HD; Roses DF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Feb; 172(2):319-23. PubMed ID: 9930775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.