These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11720937)

  • 1. Peer review in a post-eprints world: a proposal.
    Till JE
    J Med Internet Res; 2000; 2(3):E14. PubMed ID: 11720937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of an experimental chemistry preprint server.
    Warr WA
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2003; 43(2):362-73. PubMed ID: 12653498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Practical problems may preclude realization of this proposal.
    Della Mea V
    J Med Internet Res; 2000; 2(3):E15. PubMed ID: 11720938
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A retrospective analysis of submissions, acceptance rate, open peer review operations, and prepublication bias of the multidisciplinary open access journal Head & Face Medicine.
    Stamm T; Meyer U; Wiesmann HP; Kleinheinz J; Cehreli M; Cehreli ZC
    Head Face Med; 2007 Jun; 3():27. PubMed ID: 17562003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electronic publishing in radiology: beginnings, current status, and expanding horizons.
    Chew FS; Llewellyn K; Olsen KM
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Oct; 1(10):741-8. PubMed ID: 17411694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) consensus on science with treatment recommendations for pediatric and neonatal patients: pediatric basic and advanced life support.
    International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation
    Pediatrics; 2006 May; 117(5):e955-77. PubMed ID: 16618790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Peer-review and publication of research protocols and proposals: a role for open access journals.
    Eysenbach G
    J Med Internet Res; 2004 Sep; 6(3):e37. PubMed ID: 15471763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Indexes for the evaluation of scientific publications: what they are and what they are used for].
    Roncon-Albuquerque Júnior R; Leite-Moreira AF
    Rev Port Cardiol; 2000 May; 19(5):611-5. PubMed ID: 10916433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What is submitted and what gets accepted in Indian Pediatrics: analysis of submissions, review process, decision making, and criteria for rejection.
    Gupta P; Kaur G; Sharma B; Shah D; Choudhury P
    Indian Pediatr; 2006 Jun; 43(6):479-89. PubMed ID: 16820657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Message from editors to authors: review articles. How can the scientific and educational results be improved?].
    Reyes H; Goic A; Kauffmann R
    Rev Med Chil; 1993 Jun; 121(6):699-702. PubMed ID: 8278709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electronic journal access: how does it affect the print subscription price?
    Chen FL; Wrynn P; Rieke JL
    Bull Med Libr Assoc; 2001 Oct; 89(4):363-71. PubMed ID: 11837258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Digital plagiarism--the Web giveth and the Web shall taketh.
    Barrie JM; Presti DE
    J Med Internet Res; 2000; 2(1):E6. PubMed ID: 11720925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Are reviewers suggested by authors as good as those chosen by editors? Results of a rater-blinded, retrospective study.
    Wager E; Parkin EC; Tamber PS
    BMC Med; 2006 May; 4():13. PubMed ID: 16734897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Medical Journal of Australia Internet peer-review study.
    Bingham CM; Higgins G; Coleman R; Van Der Weyden MB
    Lancet; 1998 Aug; 352(9126):441-5. PubMed ID: 9708752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prepublication review of medical ethics research: cause for concern.
    Landy DC; Coverdale JH; McCullough LB; Sharp RR
    Acad Med; 2009 Apr; 84(4):495-7. PubMed ID: 19318788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conflicts of interest in medical science: peer usage, peer review and 'CoI consultancy'.
    Charlton BG
    Med Hypotheses; 2004; 63(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 15236772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Trend analysis of disaster health articles in peer-reviewed publications pre- and post-9/11.
    Kelen G; Sauer LM
    Am J Disaster Med; 2008; 3(6):369-76. PubMed ID: 19202890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A review of electronic journal acquisition, management, and use in health sciences libraries.
    Burrows S
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2006 Jan; 94(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 16404472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.