These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

319 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11722693)

  • 1. Screening mammography for frail older women: what are the burdens?
    Walter LC; Eng C; Covinsky KE
    J Gen Intern Med; 2001 Nov; 16(11):779-84. PubMed ID: 11722693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Weighing the benefits and burdens of mammography screening among women age 80 years or older.
    Schonberg MA; Silliman RA; Marcantonio ER
    J Clin Oncol; 2009 Apr; 27(11):1774-80. PubMed ID: 19255318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Decreasing women's anxieties after abnormal mammograms: a controlled trial.
    Barton MB; Morley DS; Moore S; Allen JD; Kleinman KP; Emmons KM; Fletcher SW
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Apr; 96(7):529-38. PubMed ID: 15069115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations.
    Elmore JG; Barton MB; Moceri VM; Polk S; Arena PJ; Fletcher SW
    N Engl J Med; 1998 Apr; 338(16):1089-96. PubMed ID: 9545356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Systematic review: the long-term effects of false-positive mammograms.
    Brewer NT; Salz T; Lillie SE
    Ann Intern Med; 2007 Apr; 146(7):502-10. PubMed ID: 17404352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Psychological consequences of false-positive screening mammograms in the UK.
    Bond M; Pavey T; Welch K; Cooper C; Garside R; Dean S; Hyde CJ
    Evid Based Med; 2013 Apr; 18(2):54-61. PubMed ID: 22859786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of false-positive mammograms on interval breast cancer screening in a health maintenance organization.
    Burman ML; Taplin SH; Herta DF; Elmore JG
    Ann Intern Med; 1999 Jul; 131(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 10391809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Additional double reading of screening mammograms by radiologic technologists: impact on screening performance parameters.
    Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; de Koning HJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Aug; 99(15):1162-70. PubMed ID: 17652282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predicting the cumulative risk of false-positive mammograms.
    Christiansen CL; Wang F; Barton MB; Kreuter W; Elmore JG; Gelfand AE; Fletcher SW
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2000 Oct; 92(20):1657-66. PubMed ID: 11036111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography.
    Ernster VL; Ballard-Barbash R; Barlow WE; Zheng Y; Weaver DL; Cutter G; Yankaskas BC; Rosenberg R; Carney PA; Kerlikowske K; Taplin SH; Urban N; Geller BM
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2002 Oct; 94(20):1546-54. PubMed ID: 12381707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Increased patient concern after false-positive mammograms: clinician documentation and subsequent ambulatory visits.
    Barton MB; Moore S; Polk S; Shtatland E; Elmore JG; Fletcher SW
    J Gen Intern Med; 2001 Mar; 16(3):150-6. PubMed ID: 11318909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biennial versus annual mammography and the risk of late-stage breast cancer.
    White E; Miglioretti DL; Yankaskas BC; Geller BM; Rosenberg RD; Kerlikowske K; Saba L; Vacek PM; Carney PA; Buist DS; Oestreicher N; Barlow W; Ballard-Barbash R; Taplin SH
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Dec; 96(24):1832-9. PubMed ID: 15601639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Women who are recalled for further investigation for breast screening: psychological consequences 3 years after recall and factors affecting re-attendance.
    Brett J; Austoker J
    J Public Health Med; 2001 Dec; 23(4):292-300. PubMed ID: 11873891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Systematic review of the psychological consequences of false-positive screening mammograms.
    Bond M; Pavey T; Welch K; Cooper C; Garside R; Dean S; Hyde C
    Health Technol Assess; 2013 Mar; 17(13):1-170, v-vi. PubMed ID: 23540978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can Medicare billing claims data be used to assess mammography utilization among women ages 65 and older?
    Smith-Bindman R; Quale C; Chu PW; Rosenberg R; Kerlikowske K
    Med Care; 2006 May; 44(5):463-70. PubMed ID: 16641665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mammographic screening in women at increased risk of breast cancer after treatment of Hodgkin's disease.
    Kwong A; Hancock SL; Bloom JR; Pal S; Birdwell RL; Mariscal C; Ikeda DM
    Breast J; 2008; 14(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 18186864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. International variation in screening mammography interpretations in community-based programs.
    Elmore JG; Nakano CY; Koepsell TD; Desnick LM; D'Orsi CJ; Ransohoff DF
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2003 Sep; 95(18):1384-93. PubMed ID: 13130114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Screening mammography in older women: a review.
    Walter LC; Schonberg MA
    JAMA; 2014 Apr; 311(13):1336-47. PubMed ID: 24691609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
    Lynge E
    APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.