These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11722719)

  • 1. Handling characteristics of a palladium-free gallium-based alloy compared with a high copper dental amalgam in a simulated clinical trial.
    Shaini FJ; Shortall AC; Ellakwa AE; Marquis PM
    J Oral Rehabil; 2001 Nov; 28(11):1029-36. PubMed ID: 11722719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Handling characteristics of a gallium alloy triturated with alcohol.
    Mash LK; Miller BH; Nakajima H; Guo IY; Okabe T
    Am J Dent; 1997 Aug; 10(4):199-202. PubMed ID: 9590909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Handling characteristics of gallium alloy for dental restoration.
    Mash LK; Miller BH; Nakajima H; Collard SM; Guo IY; Okabe T
    J Dent; 1993 Dec; 21(6):350-4. PubMed ID: 8258585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of the mechanical properties of a gallium-based alloy with a spherical high-copper amalgam.
    Shaini FJ; Fleming GJ; Shortall AC; Marquis PM
    Dent Mater; 2001 Mar; 17(2):142-8. PubMed ID: 11163384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Marginal adaptation and micro-porosity of class II restorations of a high copper amalgam and a palladium-free gallium-based alloy.
    Shaini FJ; Wahab FK; Ellakwa AE; Shortall AC; Fleming GJ; Marquis PM
    J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Dec; 33(12):924-33. PubMed ID: 17168935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The physical properties of a gallium alloy restorative material.
    Blair FM; Whitworth JM; McCabe JF
    Dent Mater; 1995 Jul; 11(4):277-80. PubMed ID: 8621052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gallium alloy versus high copper amalgam: a comparative evaluation of corrosion resistance and microleakage in the primary teeth.
    Munshi AK; Hegde AM; Bhaskar S
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2000; 24(4):315-9. PubMed ID: 11314418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling.
    Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M; Theodoridou-Pahini S; Papadogiannis Y; Karezis A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 11203837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mechanical retention versus bonding of amalgam and gallium alloy restorations.
    Eakle WS; Staninec M; Yip RL; Chavez MA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Oct; 72(4):351-4. PubMed ID: 7990038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Gallium: an alternative for amalgam?].
    Schuurs AH; Davidson CL
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1997 Apr; 104(4):142-5. PubMed ID: 11924385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [A basic study on gallium alloys for dental restorations. Improvement of liquid gallium alloy].
    Yada I
    Fukuoka Shika Daigaku Gakkai Zasshi; 1989; 16(2):97-117. PubMed ID: 2488904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Galvanic interaction between titanium and gallium alloy or dental amalgam.
    Horasawa N; Takahashi S; Marek M
    Dent Mater; 1999 Sep; 15(5):318-22. PubMed ID: 10863427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Galvanic corrosion and cytotoxic effects of amalgam and gallium alloys coupled to titanium.
    Bumgardner JD; Johansson BI
    Eur J Oral Sci; 1996 Jun; 104(3):300-8. PubMed ID: 8831065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative wear ranking of dental restoratives with the BIOMAT wear simulator.
    Yap AU; Ong LF; Teoh SH; Hastings GW
    J Oral Rehabil; 1999 Mar; 26(3):228-35. PubMed ID: 10194732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro corrosion behavior and microstructure examination of a gallium-based restorative.
    DeSchepper EJ; Oshida Y; Moore BK; Cook NB; Eggertson H
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(5):209-16. PubMed ID: 9484143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An evaluation of a lathe-cut high-copper amalgam alloy.
    Knibbs PJ; Plant CG; Shovelton DS; Jones PA
    J Oral Rehabil; 1987 Sep; 14(5):465-73. PubMed ID: 3312541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A 3-year clinical evaluation of a gallium restorative alloy.
    Kiremitci A; Bolay S
    J Oral Rehabil; 2003 Jun; 30(6):664-7. PubMed ID: 12787466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Condensation pressure during amalgam placement in patients.
    Lussi A; Brunner M; Portmann P; Buergin W
    Eur J Oral Sci; 1995 Dec; 103(6):388-93. PubMed ID: 8747675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [A comparative evaluation of the technological characteristics of working with metal-containing filling materials in the clinic].
    Iankevich OV
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 1997; 76(6):16-8. PubMed ID: 9471804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of setting time on the clinical performance of a high-copper amalgam alloy.
    Osborne JW; Berry TG
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 8700764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.