These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11723002)

  • 21. National Institutes of Health grant awards for pain, nausea, and dyspnea research: an assessment of funding patterns in 2003.
    Bradshaw DH; Nakamura Y; Chapman CR
    J Pain; 2005 May; 6(5):277-93. PubMed ID: 15890630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Impact of the National Cancer Act on grant support.
    Kalberer JT
    Cancer Res; 1975 Mar; 35(3):472-81. PubMed ID: 1090361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A Community-Academic Partnered Grant Writing Series to Build Infrastructure for Partnered Research.
    King KM; Pardo YJ; Norris KC; Diaz-Romero M; Morris D; Vassar SD; Brown AF
    Clin Transl Sci; 2015 Oct; 8(5):573-8. PubMed ID: 26365589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Low agreement among reviewers evaluating the same NIH grant applications.
    Pier EL; Brauer M; Filut A; Kaatz A; Raclaw J; Nathan MJ; Ford CE; Carnes M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Mar; 115(12):2952-2957. PubMed ID: 29507248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Trends in National Institutes of Health Funding of Principal Investigators in Dermatology Research by Academic Degree and Sex.
    Cheng MY; Sukhov A; Sultani H; Kim K; Maverakis E
    JAMA Dermatol; 2016 Aug; 152(8):883-8. PubMed ID: 27191545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Are Female Applicants Disadvantaged in National Institutes of Health Peer Review? Combining Algorithmic Text Mining and Qualitative Methods to Detect Evaluative Differences in R01 Reviewers' Critiques.
    Magua W; Zhu X; Bhattacharya A; Filut A; Potvien A; Leatherberry R; Lee YG; Jens M; Malikireddy D; Carnes M; Kaatz A
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2017 May; 26(5):560-570. PubMed ID: 28281870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Urology peer review at the National Institutes of Health.
    Olsson CA; Kennedy WA
    J Urol; 1995 Nov; 154(5):1866-9. PubMed ID: 7563369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Writing a successful NIH Mentored Career Development Grant (K award): hints for the junior faculty surgeon.
    Brock MV; Bouvet M
    Ann Surg; 2010 Jun; 251(6):1013-7. PubMed ID: 20485135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Understanding the NIH review process: a brief guide to writing grant proposals in neurotoxicology.
    Audesirk G; Burbacher T; Guilarte TR; Laughlin NK; Lopachin R; Suszkiw J; Tilson H
    Neurotoxicology; 1999 Feb; 20(1):91-7. PubMed ID: 10091862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Secrets of successful short grant applications.
    Groves PS; Rawl SM; Wurzbach ME; Fahrenwald N; Cohen MZ; McCarthy Beckett DO; Zerwic J; Given B; Algase DL; Alexander GL; Conn V
    West J Nurs Res; 2012 Feb; 34(1):6-23. PubMed ID: 21613655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Demystifying the NIH grant application process.
    Berg KM; Gill TM; Brown AF; Zerzan J; Elmore JG; Wilson IB
    J Gen Intern Med; 2007 Nov; 22(11):1587-95. PubMed ID: 17687616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Clinical research: perceptions, reality, and proposed solutions. National Institutes of Health Director's Panel on Clinical Research.
    Nathan DG
    JAMA; 1998 Oct; 280(16):1427-31. PubMed ID: 9801003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Do AAO-HNSF CORE Grants Predict Future NIH Funding Success?
    Eloy JA; Svider PF; Kanumuri VV; Folbe AJ; Setzen M; Baredes S
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2014 Aug; 151(2):246-52. PubMed ID: 24847049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Multidisciplinary Mentoring Programs to Enhance Junior Faculty Research Grant Success.
    Freel SA; Smith PC; Burns EN; Downer JB; Brown AJ; Dewhirst MW
    Acad Med; 2017 Oct; 92(10):1410-1415. PubMed ID: 28272113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Tracking publication outcomes of National Institutes of Health grants.
    Druss BG; Marcus SC
    Am J Med; 2005 Jun; 118(6):658-63. PubMed ID: 15922698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Funding for patient-oriented research. Critical strain on a fundamental linchpin.
    Williams GH; Wara DW; Carbone P
    JAMA; 1997 Jul; 278(3):227-31. PubMed ID: 9218670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Rethinking grant review.
    Nat Neurosci; 2008 Feb; 11(2):119. PubMed ID: 18227790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The pediatric surgeon's road to research independence: utility of mentor-based National Institutes of Health grants.
    King A; Sharma-Crawford I; Shaaban AF; Inge TH; Crombleholme TM; Warner BW; Lovvorn HN; Keswani SG
    J Surg Res; 2013 Sep; 184(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 23582227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. National Institutes of Health. Grants 'below payline' rise to help new investigators.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2009 Sep; 325(5948):1607. PubMed ID: 19779159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. NIH: Drop re-review for big grant holders.
    Roy HK
    Nature; 2012 Oct; 490(7419):176. PubMed ID: 23060177
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.