194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11723348)
1. E-mail versus conventional postal mail survey of geriatric chiefs.
Raziano DB; Jayadevappa R; Valenzula D; Weiner M; Lavizzo-Mourey R
Gerontologist; 2001 Dec; 41(6):799-804. PubMed ID: 11723348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A randomized trial of the impact of certified mail on response rate to a physician survey, and a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Del Valle ML; Morgenstern H; Rogstad TL; Albright C; Vickrey BG
Eval Health Prof; 1997 Dec; 20(4):389-406. PubMed ID: 10183331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of e-mail, fax, and postal surveys of pediatricians.
McMahon SR; Iwamoto M; Massoudi MS; Yusuf HR; Stevenson JM; David F; Chu SY; Pickering LK
Pediatrics; 2003 Apr; 111(4 Pt 1):e299-303. PubMed ID: 12671142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Electronic mail was not better than postal mail for surveying residents and faculty.
Akl EA; Maroun N; Klocke RA; Montori V; Schünemann HJ
J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Apr; 58(4):425-9. PubMed ID: 15862729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An analysis of response rate and economic costs between mail and web-based surveys among practicing dentists: a randomized trial.
Hardigan PC; Succar CT; Fleisher JM
J Community Health; 2012 Apr; 37(2):383-94. PubMed ID: 21858591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Methods for the design and administration of web-based surveys.
Schleyer TK; Forrest JL
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2000; 7(4):416-25. PubMed ID: 10887169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating patients' experiences with individual physicians: a randomized trial of mail, internet, and interactive voice response telephone administration of surveys.
Rodriguez HP; von Glahn T; Rogers WH; Chang H; Fanjiang G; Safran DG
Med Care; 2006 Feb; 44(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 16434916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective comparison of endoscopy patient satisfaction surveys: e-mail versus standard mail versus telephone.
Harewood GC; Yacavone RF; Locke GR; Wiersema MJ
Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Dec; 96(12):3312-7. PubMed ID: 11774942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Web-based surveys as an alternative to traditional mail methods.
Fleming CM; Bowden M
J Environ Manage; 2009 Jan; 90(1):284-92. PubMed ID: 18082316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Telephone follow-up was more expensive but more efficient than postal in a national stroke registry.
Lannin NA; Anderson C; Lim J; Paice K; Price C; Faux S; Levi C; Donnan G; Cadilhac D
J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Aug; 66(8):896-902. PubMed ID: 23810029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mixing web and mail methods in a survey of physicians.
Beebe TJ; Locke GR; Barnes SA; Davern ME; Anderson KJ
Health Serv Res; 2007 Jun; 42(3 Pt 1):1219-34. PubMed ID: 17489911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness of a lottery for increasing physicians' responses to a mail survey.
Baron G; De Wals P; Milord F
Eval Health Prof; 2001 Mar; 24(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 11233584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. User-experience surveys with maternity services: a randomized comparison of two data collection models.
Bjertnaes OA; Iversen HH
Int J Qual Health Care; 2012 Aug; 24(4):433-8. PubMed ID: 22687704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Survey return rates as a function of priority versus first-class mailing.
Brems C; Johnson ME; Warner T; Roberts LW
Psychol Rep; 2006 Oct; 99(2):496-501. PubMed ID: 17153820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating telephone follow-up of a mail survey of community pharmacies.
Westrick SC; Mount JK
Res Social Adm Pharm; 2007 Jun; 3(2):160-82. PubMed ID: 17561218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adding Postal Follow-Up to a Web-Based Survey of Primary Care and Gastroenterology Clinic Physician Chiefs Improved Response Rates but not Response Quality or Representativeness.
Partin MR; Powell AA; Burgess DJ; Haggstrom DA; Gravely AA; Halek K; Bangerter A; Shaukat A; Nelson DB
Eval Health Prof; 2015 Sep; 38(3):382-403. PubMed ID: 24318466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Increasing response rates for mailed surveys of Medicaid clients and other low-income populations.
Gibson PJ; Koepsell TD; Diehr P; Hale C
Am J Epidemiol; 1999 Jun; 149(11):1057-62. PubMed ID: 10355382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Combining Internet-Based and Postal Survey Methods in a Survey among Gynecologists: Results of a Randomized Trial.
Ernst SA; Brand T; Lhachimi SK; Zeeb H
Health Serv Res; 2018 Apr; 53(2):879-895. PubMed ID: 28217941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Postal surveys versus electronic mail surveys. The tortoise and the hare revisited.
Mavis BE; Brocato JJ
Eval Health Prof; 1998 Sep; 21(3):395-408. PubMed ID: 10350958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. No increase in response rate by adding a web response option to a postal population survey: a randomized trial.
Brøgger J; Nystad W; Cappelen I; Bakke P
J Med Internet Res; 2007 Dec; 9(5):e40. PubMed ID: 18174120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
