These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11723406)

  • 1. Anterior/posterior lumbar fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: analysis of complications and predictive factors.
    Hee HT; Castro FP; Majd ME; Holt RT; Myers L
    J Spinal Disord; 2001 Dec; 14(6):533-40. PubMed ID: 11723406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of posterior and transforaminal approaches to lumbar interbody fusion.
    Humphreys SC; Hodges SD; Patwardhan AG; Eck JC; Murphy RB; Covington LA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Mar; 26(5):567-71. PubMed ID: 11242386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Increased incidence of pseudarthrosis after unilateral instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in patients with lumbar spondylosis: Clinical article.
    Gologorsky Y; Skovrlj B; Steinberger J; Moore M; Arginteanu M; Moore F; Steinberger A
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Oct; 21(4):601-7. PubMed ID: 25084031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of open and minimally invasive techniques for posterior lumbar instrumentation and fusion after open anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Kepler CK; Yu AL; Gruskay JA; Delasotta LA; Radcliff KE; Rihn JA; Hilibrand AS; Anderson DG; Vaccaro AR
    Spine J; 2013 May; 13(5):489-97. PubMed ID: 23218509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transforaminal interbody fusion versus anterior-posterior interbody fusion of the lumbar spine: a financial analysis.
    Whitecloud TS; Roesch WW; Ricciardi JE
    J Spinal Disord; 2001 Apr; 14(2):100-3. PubMed ID: 11285420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of three different posterior fixation techniques in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for two-level lumbar degenerative diseases: At a mean follow up time of 46 months.
    Liu F; Cao Y; Feng Z; Zhou X; Jiang C; Li X; Chen Z; Li Z; Liang Y; Jiang X; Dong J
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2016 Feb; 141():1-6. PubMed ID: 26691785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intraoperative and early postoperative complications in extreme lateral interbody fusion: an analysis of 600 cases.
    Rodgers WB; Gerber EJ; Patterson J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jan; 36(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 21192221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of complications, costs, and length of stay of three different lumbar interbody fusion techniques: an analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database.
    Goz V; Weinreb JH; Schwab F; Lafage V; Errico TJ
    Spine J; 2014 Sep; 14(9):2019-27. PubMed ID: 24333459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Utility of multilevel lateral interbody fusion of the thoracolumbar coronal curve apex in adult deformity surgery in combination with open posterior instrumentation and L5-S1 interbody fusion: a case-matched evaluation of 32 patients.
    Theologis AA; Mundis GM; Nguyen S; Okonkwo DO; Mummaneni PV; Smith JS; Shaffrey CI; Fessler R; Bess S; Schwab F; Diebo BG; Burton D; Hart R; Deviren V; Ames C;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Feb; 26(2):208-219. PubMed ID: 27767682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Oblique Anterolateral Approach to the Lumbar Spine Provides Access to the Lumbar Spine With Few Early Complications.
    Mehren C; Mayer HM; Zandanell C; Siepe CJ; Korge A
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Sep; 474(9):2020-7. PubMed ID: 27160744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Circumferential fusion: a comparative analysis between anterior lumbar interbody fusion with posterior pedicle screw fixation and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for L5-S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis.
    Tye EY; Tanenbaum JE; Alonso AS; Xiao R; Steinmetz MP; Mroz TE; Savage JW
    Spine J; 2018 Mar; 18(3):464-471. PubMed ID: 28821444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimally invasive interbody fusion for revision lumbar surgery: technical feasibility and safety.
    Selznick LA; Shamji MF; Isaacs RE
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 May; 22(3):207-13. PubMed ID: 19412024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the flexibility of the lumbar spine.
    Harris BM; Hilibrand AS; Savas PE; Pellegrino A; Vaccaro AR; Siegler S; Albert TJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Feb; 29(4):E65-70. PubMed ID: 15094547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Outcomes of Anterior, Posterior, and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery at a Single Lumbar Level with Degenerative Spinal Disease.
    Lee N; Kim KN; Yi S; Ha Y; Shin DA; Yoon DH; Kim KS
    World Neurosurg; 2017 May; 101():216-226. PubMed ID: 28189865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correction of severe spinopelvic mismatch: decreased blood loss with lateral hyperlordotic interbody grafts as compared with pedicle subtraction osteotomy.
    Leveque JC; Yanamadala V; Buchlak QD; Sethi RK
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E15. PubMed ID: 28760028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: surgical technique and results in 24 patients.
    Salehi SA; Tawk R; Ganju A; LaMarca F; Liu JC; Ondra SL
    Neurosurgery; 2004 Feb; 54(2):368-74; discussion 374. PubMed ID: 14744283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transforaminal versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion in long deformity constructs: a matched cohort analysis.
    Dorward IG; Lenke LG; Bridwell KH; OʼLeary PT; Stoker GE; Pahys JM; Kang MM; Sides BA; Koester LA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 May; 38(12):E755-62. PubMed ID: 23442780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [COMPARISON OF EFFECTIVENESS AND CHANGE OF SAGITTAL SPINO-PELVIC PARAMETERS BETWEEN MINIMALLY INVASIVE TRANSFORAMINAL AND CONVENTIONAL OPEN POSTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSIONS IN TREATMENT OF LOW-DEGREE ISTHMIC LUMBAR SPONDYLOLISTHESIS].
    Sun X; Zeng R; Li G; Wei B; Hu Z; Lin H; Chen G; Chen S; Sun J
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 29(12):1504-9. PubMed ID: 27044219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Anterior and posterior lumbar interbody fusion with percutaneous pedicle screws: comparison to muscle damage and minimally invasive techniques.
    Dickerman RD; East JW; Winters K; Tackett J; Hajovsky-Pietla A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Dec; 34(25):E923-5. PubMed ID: 19940722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing Cortical Trajectory Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusions Against Pedicle Trajectory Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusions and Posterolateral Fusions: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 90-day Outcomes.
    Malcolm JG; Moore MK; Choksh FH; Ahmad FU; Refai D
    Neurosurgery; 2018 Dec; 83(6):1234-1240. PubMed ID: 29346684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.